Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation

  • LISA DISCH (a1)
Abstract

This article analyzes what I term “the dilemma of democratic competence,” which emerges when researchers find their expectations regarding democratic responsiveness to be in conflict with their findings regarding the context dependency of individual preferences. I attribute this dilemma to scholars' normative expectations, rather than to deficiencies of mass democratic politics. I propose a mobilization conception of political representation and develop a systemic understanding of reflexivity as the measure of its legitimacy. This article thus contributes to the emergent normative argument that political representation is intrinsic to democratic government, and links that claim to empirical research on political preference formation.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Lisa Disch is Professor, Departments of Political Science and Women's Studies, University of Michigan, 5700 Haven Hall, 505 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (ldisch@umich.edu).
References
Hide All
Achen, Christopher H. 1975. “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.” American Political Science Review 69 (4): 1218–31.
Althaus, Scott, Edy, Jill, Entman, Robert, and Phelen, Patricia. 1996. “Revising the Indexing Hypothesis: Officials, Media and the Libya Crisis.” Political Communication 13 (4): 407–21.
Ankersmit, F.R. 2002. Political Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Barber, Benjamin, R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bartels, Larry. 2003. “Democracy with Attitudes.” In Electoral Democracy, eds. McKuen, Michael B. and Rabinowitz, George. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 4882.
Bennett, W. Lance. 1990. “Toward a Theory of Press–State Relations.” Journal of Communication 40 (2): 103–25.
Bennett, W. Lance, and Manheim, Jarol B.. 1993. “Taking the Public by Storm: Information, Cueing, and the Democratic Process in the Gulf Conflict.” Political Communication 10 (4): 331–52.
Bentley, Arthur F. 1908. The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bickford, Susan. 1996. The Dissonance of Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bohman, James. 1988. “Emancipation and Rhetoric: The Perlocutions and Illocutions of the Social Critic.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 21 (3): 185204.
Bohman, James. 1996. Public Deliberation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. [1981] 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Ed and intro. Thompson, John B.. Trans. Raymond, Gino and Adamson, Matthew. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Butler, Judith. 1995. “For a Careful Reading.” In Feminist Contentions, eds. Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla, and Fraser, Nancy. New York: Routledge, 127–44.
Carmines, E., and Kuklinski, J.. 1990. “Incentives, Opportunities and the Logic of Public Opinion in American Political Representation.” In Information and Democratic Processes, eds. Ferejohn, J. A. and Kuklinsky, J.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 240–68.
Chong, Dennis. 2000. Rational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James. 2007. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101 (4): 637–55.
Cohen, Joshua. 1986. “An Epistemic Conception of Democracy.” Ethics 97: 2638.
Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity, eds. Hamlin, A. and Pettit, P.. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1734.
Condorcet, Marquis de. 1793. “Plan de Constitution, présenté à la Convention Nationale, les 15 & 16 fevrier 1793, l'an II de la République.” http://mjp.univ-perp.fr/france/co1793pr.htm (accessed January 28, 2011).
Dahl, Robert. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Derrida, Jacques. [1967] 1973. “Speech and Phenomena: Introduction to the Problem of Signs in Husserl's Phenomenology.” In Speech and Phenomena, trans. Allison, David B.. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 17104.
Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black or Latino Do?American Political Science Review 96 (4): 729–43.
Druckman, James N. 2001a. “The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence.” Political Behavior 23 (3): 225–56.
Druckman, James N. 2001b. “Evaluating Framing Effects.” Journal of Economic Psychology 22: 91101.
Druckman, James N. 2004. “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 671–86.
Druckman, James N. 2010. “What's It All About? Framing in Political Science.” In Perspectives on Framing, ed. Keren, Gideon. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis, 279302
Druckman, James N., Hennessy, Cari Lynn, St. Charles, Kristi, and Webber, Jonathan. 2010. “Competing Rhetoric over Time: Frames vs. Cues.” Journal of Politics 72 (1): 136–48.
Druckman, James N., and Lupia, Arthur. 2000. “Preference Formation.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 124.
Eulau, Heinz, and Karps, Paul D.. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (3): 241–47.
Forst, Rainer. 2001. “The Rule of Reasons: Three Models of Deliberative Democracy.” Ratio Juris 14 (4): 345–78.
Forst, Rainer. 2010. “The Justification of Human Rights and the Basic Right to Justification: A Reflexive Approach.” Ethics 120: 711–40.
Gamson, William A., and Modigliani, Andre. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 137.
Garsten, Bryan. 2006. Saving Persuasion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Garsten, Bryan. 2009. “Representative Government and Popular Sovereignty.” In Political Representation, eds. Shapiro, Ian, Stokes, Susan C., Wood, Elisabeth Jean, and Kirshner, Alexander S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90110.
Gerber, Elizabeth, and Jackson, John E.. 1993. “Endogenous Preferences and the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 639–56.
Goodin, Robert E., and Dryzek, John S.. 2006. “Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-political Uptake of Mini-publics.” Politics and Society 34 (20): 219–44.
Grant, Ruth, and Keohane, Robert O.. 2005. “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 99 (1): 2944.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1988. Between Facts and Norms. Trans. Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Trans. Lenhardt, Christian and Nicholsen, Shierry Weber. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hansen, S. B. 1975. “Participation, Political Structure, and Concurrence.” American Political Science Review 69 (4): 1181–99.
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.
Hayward, Clarissa Rile. 2009. “Making Interest: On Representation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Political Representation, eds. Shapiro, Ian, Stokes, Susan C., Wood, Elisabeth Jean, and Kirshner, Alexander S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 111–35.
Jacobs, Lawrence, and Shapiro, Robert J.. 2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jewell, Malcolm. 1983. “Legislator–Constituency Relations and the Representative Process.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8 (3): 303–37.
Kaplan, Michael. 2003. “Iconomics: The Rhetoric of Speculation.” Public Culture 15 (3): 477–93.
Kinder, Donald R., and Nelson, Thomas E.. 2005. “Democratic Debate and Real Opinions.” In Framing American Politics, eds. Callaghan, Karen J., Schnell, Frauke, and Entman, Robert M.. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 103–22.
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn. 1996. Divided by Color. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Koselleck, Reinhart. [1979] 2004. “History, Histories, and Formal Time Structures.” In Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, trans and intro. Tribe, Keith. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 93104.
Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Jerit, Jennifer, and Rich, Robert F.. 2001. “The Political Environment and Citizen Competence.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (20): 410–24.
Kuklinski, James H., and Segura, Gary M.. 1995. “Endogeneity, Exogeneity, Time, and Space in Political Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (1): 321.
Lavaque-Manty, Mika. 2006. “Bentley, Truman and the Study of Groups.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 118.
Lavaque-Manty, Mika. 2009. “Finding Theoretical Concepts in the Real World: The Case of the Precariat.” In New Waves in Political Philosophy, eds. de Bruin, Boudewijn and Zurn, Christopher F.. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 105–24.
Laclau, Ernesto. 1996. Emancipations. New York: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. New York: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. New York: Verso.
Lupia, Arthur. 1992. “Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information.” American Political Science Review 86 (2): 390403.
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88 (1): 6376.
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Matthew. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.
Manza, Jeff, and Cook, Fay Lomax. 2002. “A Democratic Polity? Three Views of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion in the United States.” American Politics Research 30 (6): 630–67.
McClure, Kirstie. 1992. “On the Subject of Rights: Pluralism, Plurality and Political Identity.” In Dimensions of Radical Democracy, ed. Mouffe, Chantal. New York: Verso, 108–27.
Miller, James. 1987. Democracy Is in the Streets: From Port Huron to the Siege of Chicago. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 4556.
Montanero, Laura. 2010. “The Democratic Legitimacy of ‘Self-appointed’ Representatives.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Näsström, Sofia. 2006. “Representative Democracy as Tautology.” European Journal of Political Theory 5 (3): 321–42.
O'Neill, Onora. 2002. “Constructivism in Rawls and Kant.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 347–67.
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peterson, Paul. 1970. “Forms of Representation: Participation of the Poor in the Community Action Program.” American Political Science Review 64 (2): 491507.
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pikin, Hanna. 1989. “Representation.” In Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, eds. Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 132–41.
Pitkin, Hanna. 2004. “Representation and Democracy: Uneasy Alliance.” Scandinavian Political Studies 27 (3): 335–42.
Plotke, David. 1997. “Representation is Democracy.” Constellations 4 (1): 1934.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Political Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Prewitt, Kenneth, and Eulau, Heinz. 1969. “Political Matrix and Political Representation: Prolegomenon to a New Departure from an Old Problem.” American Political Science Review 63 (2): 427–41.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2006. “Towards a General Theory of Representation.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 121.
Rogowski, Ronald. 1981. “Representation in Political Theory and in Law.” Ethics 91 (3): 395430.
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008. La Légitimité Démocratique: Impartialité, Réflexivité, Proximité. Paris: Seuil.
Rosenblum, Nancy L. 2008. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Runciman, David. 2007. “The Paradox of Political Representation.”Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (1): 93114.
Saward, Michael. 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5: 297318.
Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. [1960] 1975. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
Schwartz, Nancy L. 1988. The Blue Guitar: Political Representation and Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Seitz, Brian. 1995. The Trace of Political Representation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Sniderman, Paul M. 2000. “Taking Sides: A Fixed Choice Theory of Political Reasoning.” In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, eds. Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 6784.
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Levendusky, Matthew S.. 2007. “An Institutional Theory of Political Choice.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, eds. Dalton, Russell J. and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. New York: Oxford University Press, 437–56.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Theriault, Sean M.. 2004. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Studies in Public Opinion, eds. Saris, Willem E. and Sniderman, Paul M.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 133–65.
Snow, David A., and Benford, Robert D.. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1: 197217.
Squires, Judith. 2008. “The Constitutive Representation of Gender: Extra-parliamentary Re-presentation of Gender Relations.” Representation 44 (2): 187204.
Sunstein, Cass. 1991. “Preferences and Politics.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (10): 334.
Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Urbinati, Nadia, and Warren, Mark E.. 2008. “The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387412.
Wahlke, John C. 1971. “Policy Demands and System Support: The Role of the Represented.” British Journal of Political Science 1 (3): 271–90.
Warren, Mark E., and Castiglione, Dario. N.d. “Rethinking Democratic Representation: Eight Theoretical Issues.” Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Williams, Melissa. 1990. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Young, Iris Marion. 1997. “Deferring Group Representation.” In NOMOS XXXIX, Ethnicity and Group Rights, eds. Shapiro, Ian and Kymlicka, Will. New York: New York University Press, 349–76.
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 39
Total number of PDF views: 606 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1510 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.