Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 124
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Leitgöb, Heinz 2017. Methodische Probleme von Mixed-Mode-Ansätzen in der Umfrageforschung.

    ACHARYA, AVIDIT BLACKWELL, MATTHEW and SEN, MAYA 2016. Explaining Causal Findings Without Bias: Detecting and Assessing Direct Effects. American Political Science Review, p. 1.

    Albertson, Bethany and Gadarian, Shana Kushner 2016. Did that Scare You? Tips on Creating Emotion in Experimental Subjects: Table 1. Political Analysis, p. mpw022.

    Andersen, Simon Calmar and Hjortskov, Morten 2016. Cognitive Biases in Performance Evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 26, Issue. 4, p. 647.

    Bayram, A. Burcu 2016. Aiding Strangers: Generalized Trust and the Moral Basis of Public Support for Foreign Development Aid. Foreign Policy Analysis, p. orw008.

    Bernardi, Fabrizio and Boertien, Diederik 2016. Understanding Heterogeneity in the Effects of Parental Separation on Educational Attainment in Britain: Do Children from Lower Educational Backgrounds Have Less to Lose?. European Sociological Review, p. jcw036.

    Bersch, Katherine Praça, Sérgio and Taylor, Matthew M. 2016. State Capacity, Bureaucratic Politicization, and Corruption in the Brazilian State. Governance, p. n/a.

    Calfano, Brian and Oldmixon, Elizabeth 2016. Remembering to Ask the Boss: Priming and the Dynamics of Priest Reliance on Bishop Cues. Religions, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 21.

    Chryssochoidis, George Dousios, Dimitrios and Tzokas, Nikolaos 2016. Small Firm Adaptive Capability, Competitive Strategy, and Performance Outcomes: Competing Mediation vs. Moderation Perspectives. Strategic Change, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 441.

    Elder, Edward 2016. Marketing Leadership in Government.

    Gervais, Bryan T. 2016. More than Mimicry? The Role of Anger in Uncivil Reactions to Elite Political Incivility. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, p. edw010.

    Ghezzi, Pietro Jaquet, Vincent Marcucci, Fabrizio and Schmidt, Harald H H W 2016. The oxidative stress theory of disease: levels of evidence and epistemological aspects. British Journal of Pharmacology,

    GrzyMala-Busse, Anna 2016. Weapons of the Meek. World Politics, Vol. 68, Issue. 01, p. 1.

    Hall, Matthew E.K. 2016. Macro Implementation: Testing the Causal Paths from U.S. Macro Policy to Federal Incarceration. American Journal of Political Science,

    Hallam, Cory Zanella, Gianluca Dorantes Dosamantes, Carlos Alberto and Cardenas, Cesar 2016. Measuring entrepreneurial intent? Temporal construal theory shows it depends on your timing. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 22, Issue. 5, p. 671.

    Kaplan, David 2016. Causal inference with large-scale assessments in education from a Bayesian perspective: a review and synthesis. Large-scale Assessments in Education, Vol. 4, Issue. 1,

    Kim, Yong Kyun 2016. States Sued: Democracy, the Rule of Law, and Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS). International Interactions, p. 1.

    Kim, Minyoung 2016. Geographic scope, isolating mechanisms, and value appropriation. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 695.

    Kim, Yongnam and Steiner, Peter 2016. Quasi-Experimental Designs for Causal Inference. Educational Psychologist, Vol. 51, Issue. 3-4, p. 395.

    Knutsen, Carl Henrik Kotsadam, Andreas Olsen, Eivind Hammersmark and Wig, Tore 2016. Mining and Local Corruption in Africa. American Journal of Political Science,


Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 10 November 2011

Identifying causal mechanisms is a fundamental goal of social science. Researchers seek to study not only whether one variable affects another but also how such a causal relationship arises. Yet commonly used statistical methods for identifying causal mechanisms rely upon untestable assumptions and are often inappropriate even under those assumptions. Randomizing treatment and intermediate variables is also insufficient. Despite these difficulties, the study of causal mechanisms is too important to abandon. We make three contributions to improve research on causal mechanisms. First, we present a minimum set of assumptions required under standard designs of experimental and observational studies and develop a general algorithm for estimating causal mediation effects. Second, we provide a method for assessing the sensitivity of conclusions to potential violations of a key assumption. Third, we offer alternative research designs for identifying causal mechanisms under weaker assumptions. The proposed approach is illustrated using media framing experiments and incumbency advantage studies.

Corresponding author
Kosuke Imai is Associate Professor, Department of Politics, Princeton University, Corwin Hall 036, Princeton NJ 08544 (
Luke Keele is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University, 211 Pond Lab, University Park, PA 16802 (
Dustin Tingley is Assistant Professor, Department of Government, Harvard University, 1737 Cambridge Street, CGIS Knafel Building 208, Cambridge MA 02138 (
Teppei Yamamoto is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139 (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Albert 2008. “Mediation Analysis via Potential Outcomes Models.” Statistics in Medicine 27: 12821304.

J. D. Angrist , G. W. Imbens , and D. B. Rubin . 1996. “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables (with Discussion).” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (434): 444–55.

S. Ansolabehere , E. C. Snowberg , and J. M. Snyder . 2006. “Television and the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (4): 469–90.

S. Ansolabehere , J. M. Snyder , and C. Stewart . 2000. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 1734.

R. M. Baron , and D. A. Kenny . 1986. “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–82.

M. Bertrand , and S. Mullainathan . 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 9911013.

T. Brader , N. A. Valentino , and E. Suhay . 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 959–78.

J. Bullock , D. Green , and S. Ha . 2010. “Yes, But What's the Mechanism? (Don't Expect an Easy Answer).” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98 (4): 550–58.

D. Chong , and J. Druckman . 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–26.

S. R. Cole , and C. E. Frangakis . 2009. “The Consistency Statement in Causal Inference: A Definition or Assumption?Epidemiology 20 (1): 35.

G. W. Cox , and J. N. Katz . 1996. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow?American Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 478–97.

A. Deaton 2010a. “Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 48 (2): 424–55.

A. Deaton 2010b. “Understanding the Mechanisms of Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (3): 316.

R. S. Erikson , and T. R. Palfrey . 1998. “Campaign Spending and Incumbency: An Alternative Simultaneous Equations Approach.” Journal of Politics 60 (2): 355–73.

S. K. Gadarian 2010. “The Politics of Threat: How Terrorism News Shapes Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Politics 72 (2): 469–83.

A. Gelman , and G. King . 1990. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 1142–64.

D. P. Green , S. E. Ha , and J. G. Bullock . 2010. “Enough Already about Black Box Experiments: Studying Mediation Is More Difficult Than Most Scholars Suppose.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 628 (1): 200–08.

J. J. Gross , and R. W. Levenson . 1995. “Eliciting Emotions Using Films.” Cognition and Emotion 9 (1): 87108.

T. Haavelmo 1943. “The Statistical Implications of a System of Simultaneous Equations.” Econometrica 11: 112.

J. J. Heckman , and J. A. Smith . 1995. “Assessing the Case for Social Experiments.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2): 85110.

D. E. Ho , K. Imai , G. King , and E. A. Stuart . 2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 199236.

P. W. Holland 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 945–60.

P. W. Holland 1988. “Causal Inference, Path Analysis, and Recursive Structural Equations Models.” Sociological Methodology 18: 449–84.

Y. Horiuchi , K. Imai , and N. Taniguchi . 2007. “Designing and Analyzing Randomized Experiments: Application to a Japanese Election Survey Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 669–87.

K. Imai , L. Keele , and D. Tingley . 2010. “A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis.” Psychological Methods 15 (4): 309–34.

K. Imai , L. Keele , D. Tingley and T. Yamamoto . 2010. “Causal Mediation Analysis Using R”. In Advances in Social Science Research Using R, ed. H. D. Vinod , Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer-verlag: New York, 129–54.

K. Imai , L. Keele , and T. Yamamoto . 2010. “Identification, Inference, and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects.” Statistical Science 25 (1): 5171.

K. Imai , G. King , and E. A. Stuart . 2008. “Misunderstandings among Experimentalists and Observationalists about Causal Inference.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (Statistics in Society) 171 (2): 481502.

K. Imai , and T. Yamamoto . 2010. “Causal Inference with Differential Measurement Error: Nonparametric Identification and Sensitivity Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 543–60.

L. Isbell , and V. Ottati . 2002. “The Emotional Voter.” In The Social Psychology of Politics, ed. V. Ottati , New York: Kluwer, 5574.

B. Jo 2008. “Causal Inference in Randomized Experiments with Mediational Processes.” Psychological Methods 13 (4): 314–36.

J. T. Jost , J. L. Napier , H. Thorisdottir , S. D. Gosling , T. P. Palfai , and B. Ostafin . 2007. “Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated With Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33 (7): 9891007.

G. King , M. Tomz , and J. Wittenberg . 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 341–55.

S. D. Levitt and C. D. Wolfram . 1997. “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (1): 4560.

D. MacKinnon , C. Lockwood , C. Brown , W. Wang , and J. Hoffman . 2007. “The Intermediate Endpoint Effect in Logistic and Probit Regression.” Clinical Trials 4: 499513.

J. M. Miller , and J. A. Krosnick . 2000. “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 301–15.

T. E. Nelson , and D. R. Kinder . 1996. “Issue Frames and Group-centrism in American Public Opinion.” The Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1055–78.

A. Olsson , J. P. Ebert , M. R. Banaji , and E. A. Phelps . 2005. “The Role of Social Groups in the Persistence of Learned Fear.” Science 309 (5735): 785–87.

D. R. Oxley , K. B. Smith , J. R. Alford , M. V. Hibbing , J. L. Miller , M. Scalora , P. K. Hatemi , and J. R. Hibbing . 2008. “Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits.” Science 321 (5896): 1667–70.

M. L. Petersen , S. E. Sinisi , and M. J. van der Laan . 2006. “Estimation of Direct Causal Effects.” Epidemiology 17 (3): 276–84.

M. Prior 2006. “The Incumbent in the Living Room: The Rise of Television and the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 68 (3): 657–73.

J. M. Robins , and S. Greenland . 1992. “Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect Effects.” Epidemiology 3 (2): 143–55.

D. B. Rubin 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Non-randomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 688701.

A. Sjölander 2009. “Bounds on Natural Direct Effects in the Presence of Confounded Intermediate Variables.” Statistics in Medicine 28 (4): 558–71.

M. E. Sobel 1982. “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models.” Sociological Methodology 13: 290321.

M. E. Sobel 2008. “Identification of Causal Parameters in Randomized Studies with Mediating Variables.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 33 (2): 230–51.

S. Spencer , M. Zanna , and G. Fong . 2005. “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (6): 845–51.

L. Z. Tiedens and S. Linton . 2001. “Judgment under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty: The Effects of Specific Emotions on Information Processing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (6): 973–88.

T. J. VanderWeele 2009. “Marginal Structural Models for the Estimation of Direct and Indirect Effects.” Epidemiology 20 (1): 1826.

T. J. VanderWeele and J. M. Robins . 2009. “Minimal Sufficient Causation and Directed Acyclic Graphs.” Annals of Statistics 37 (3): 1437–65.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *