Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Political Mobilization of American Women

  • DANIEL CARPENTER (a1) and COLIN D. MOORE (a2)
Abstract

Examining an original dataset of more than 8,500 antislavery petitions sent to Congress (1833–1845), we argue that American women's petition canvassing conferred skills and contacts that empowered their later activism. We find that women canvassers gathered 50% or more signatures (absolute and per capita) than men while circulating the same petition requests in the same locales. Supplementary evidence (mainly qualitative) points to women's persuasive capacity and network building as the most plausible mechanisms for this increased efficacy. We then present evidence that leaders in the women's rights and reform campaigns of the nineteenth century were previously active in antislavery canvassing. Pivotal signers of the Seneca Falls Declaration were antislavery petition canvassers, and in an independent sample of post–Civil War activists, women were four times more likely than men to have served as identifiable antislavery canvassers. For American women, petition canvassing—with its patterns of persuasion and networking—shaped legacies in political argument, network formation, and organizing.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Daniel Carpenter is Allie S. Freed Professor of Government; Director, Center for American Political Studies; Director of Social Sciences, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study Harvard University (dcarpenter@gov.harvard.edu)
Colin D. Moore is Assistant Professor of Political Science University of Hawaii (cdmoore@hawaii.edu)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Richard D. Bingham , John P. Frendreis , and James M. Rhodes . 1978. “The Nominating Process in Nonpartisan Elections: Petition Signing as an Act of Support.” Journal of Politics 40 (4): 1044–53.

Craig Calhoun . 2012. The Roots of Radicalism: Tradition, the Public Sphere, and Early-Nineteenth-Century Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Andrea M Campbell . 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Citizen Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Neal Caren , Raj Andrew Ghoshal , and Vanessa Ribas . 2011. “A Social Movement Generation: Cohort and Period Trends in Protest Attendance and Petition Signing.” American Sociological Review 76 (1): 125–51.

Harry Helson , Robert Blake , and Jane Srygly Mouton . 1958. “Petition Signing as Adjustment to Personal and Situational Factors.” Journal of Social Psychology 48 (August): 310.

J. P. Katosh , and Michael W. Traugott . 1981. “The Consequences of Validated and Self-Reported Voting Measures.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 519.

Brian B. Knudsen , and Terry L. Clark . 2013. “Walk and Be Moved: How Walking Builds Social Movements,” Urban Affairs Review, June 2, doi: 10.1177/1078087413490395.

Suzanne Marilley . 1996. Woman Suffrage and the Origins of Liberal Feminism, 1820–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Doug McAdam . 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

William Lee Miller . 1995. Arguing about Slavery: John Quincy Adams and the Great Battle in the United States Congress. New York: Vintage.

Diana Mutz . 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Johann Neem . 2008. Creating a Nation of Joiners: Democracy and Civil Society in Early National Massachusetts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Christopher S Parker . 2009a. “When Politics Becomes Protest: Black Veterans and Political Activism in the Postwar SouthJournal of Politics 71 (1): 113–31.

Alisse Portnoy . 2003. “‘Female Petitioners Can Lawfully Be Heard’: Negotiating Female Decorum, U.S. Politics, and Political Agency, 1829–31.” Journal of the Early Republic 23 (2003): 573610.

Alisse Portnoy . 2005. Their Right to Speak: Women's Activism in the Indian and Slave Debates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kathryn Kish Sklar . 2000. Women's Rights Emerges within the Antislavery Movement, 1830–1870. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.

Mark A Smith . 2002. “Ballot Initiatives and the Democratic Citizen.” Journal of Politics 64: 892903.

Peter Suedfeld , Stephen Bochner , and Carol Matas . 1971. “Petitioner's Attire and Petition Signing by Peace Demonstrators: A Field Experiment.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1 (3): 278–83.

Anne-Marie E Szymanski . 2003. Pathways to Prohibition: Radicals, Moderates and Social Movement Outcomes. Durham: Duke University Press.

Nicholas A. Valentino , Krysha Gregorowicz , and Eric W. Groenendyk . 2009. “Efficacy, Emotions, and the Habit of Participation.” Political Behavior 31 (3): 307–30.

Katherine Cramer Walsh . 2006. “Applying Norton's Challenge to the Study of Political Behavior: Focus on Process, the Particular and the Ordinary.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (2): 353–59.

Katherine Cramer Walsh . 2007. Talking about Race: Community Dialogues and the Politics of Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Judith Wellman . 1991. “The Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention: A Study in Social Networks.” Women's History 3 (1): 937.

Allen R. Wilcox , and Leonard B. Weinberg . 1977. “Petition Signing in the 1968 Election.” Western Political Quarterly 24 (4): 731–39.

John R Zaller . 2002. “The Statistical Power of Election Studies to Detect Media Exposure Effects in Political Campaigns.” Electoral Studies 21: 297329.

Daniel Ziblatt . 2008. “Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The Case of Nineteenth Century Germany.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 121.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Carpenter supplementary material
Carpenter supplementary material

 PDF (614 KB)
614 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 203 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 623 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.