Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Political Mobilization of American Women

  • DANIEL CARPENTER (a1) and COLIN D. MOORE (a2)
Abstract

Examining an original dataset of more than 8,500 antislavery petitions sent to Congress (1833–1845), we argue that American women's petition canvassing conferred skills and contacts that empowered their later activism. We find that women canvassers gathered 50% or more signatures (absolute and per capita) than men while circulating the same petition requests in the same locales. Supplementary evidence (mainly qualitative) points to women's persuasive capacity and network building as the most plausible mechanisms for this increased efficacy. We then present evidence that leaders in the women's rights and reform campaigns of the nineteenth century were previously active in antislavery canvassing. Pivotal signers of the Seneca Falls Declaration were antislavery petition canvassers, and in an independent sample of post–Civil War activists, women were four times more likely than men to have served as identifiable antislavery canvassers. For American women, petition canvassing—with its patterns of persuasion and networking—shaped legacies in political argument, network formation, and organizing.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Daniel Carpenter is Allie S. Freed Professor of Government; Director, Center for American Political Studies; Director of Social Sciences, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study Harvard University (dcarpenter@gov.harvard.edu)
Colin D. Moore is Assistant Professor of Political Science University of Hawaii (cdmoore@hawaii.edu)
References
Hide All
BaileyRaymond C. 1979. Popular Influence upon Public Policy: Petitioning in Eighteenth-Century Virginia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
BergBarbara. 1978. The Remembered Gate: The Woman and the City, 1800–1860. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BinghamRichard D., Frendreis John P., and Rhodes James M.. 1978. “The Nominating Process in Nonpartisan Elections: Petition Signing as an Act of Support.” Journal of Politics 40 (4): 1044–53.
BlakeRobert, Mouton Jane Srygly, and Hain J. D.. 1956. “Social Forces in Petition-Signing.” Southwestern Social Science Quarterly 37 (March): 384–90.
Bowling Kenneth R., and Kennon Donald R., eds. 2002. The House and Senate in the 1790s: Petitioning, Lobbying, and Institutional Development. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
BoylanAnne M. 2002. The Origins of Women's Activism: New York and Boston, 1797–1840. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
BradyHenry, Schlozman Kay L., and Verba Sidney. 1999. “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists.” American Political Science Review 93: 153–68.
BurnsNancy, Scholzman Kay L., and Verba Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Inequality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
CalhounCraig. 2012. The Roots of Radicalism: Tradition, the Public Sphere, and Early-Nineteenth-Century Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
CampbellAndrea M. 2002. “Self-Interest, Social Security, and the Distinctive Participation Patterns of Senior Citizens.” American Political Science Review 96 (September): 565–74.
CampbellAndrea M. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Citizen Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
CarenNeal, Ghoshal Raj Andrew, and Ribas Vanessa. 2011. “A Social Movement Generation: Cohort and Period Trends in Protest Attendance and Petition Signing.” American Sociological Review 76 (1): 125–51.
ChaceElizabeth Buffum. 1891. Anti-Slavery Reminiscences. Central Falls, RI: E. L. Freeman & Son.
ChapmanMaria Weston. 1839. Right and Wrong in Massachusetts. Boston : Dow 7 Jackson’s Anti-Slavery Press.
ClemensElisabeth. 1997. The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
CottNancy F. 1997. The Bonds of Womanhood: “Woman's Sphere” in New England, 1780–1830. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
DumondDwight. 1961. Antislavery: The Crusade for Freedom in America. New York: Norton.
DuBoisEllen Carol. 1978. Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women's Movement in America, 1848–1869. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
FlexnerEleanor, and Fitzpatrick Ellen. 1996. Century of Struggle: The Woman's Rights Movement in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
GrimkéAngelina. 1837. An Appeal to the Women of the Nominally Free States. New York: William S. Door.
GrimkéSarah. 1838. Letters on the Equality of the Sexes and the Condition of Woman, Addressed to Mary Parker, President of the Boston Female Anti-Slavery Society. Boston: Isaac Knapp.
HelsonHarry, Blake Robert, and Mouton Jane Srygly. 1958. “Petition Signing as Adjustment to Personal and Situational Factors.” Journal of Social Psychology 48 (August): 310.
HewittNancy. 1984. Women's Activism and Social Change: Rochester, New York, 1822–1872. New York: Oxford University Press.
JeffreyJulie Roy. 1998. The Great Silent Army of Abolitionism: Ordinary Women in the Antislavery Movement. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
KatoshJ. P., and Traugott Michael W.. 1981. “The Consequences of Validated and Self-Reported Voting Measures.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 519.
KerberLinda. 1980. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
KnudsenBrian B., and Clark Terry L.. 2013. “Walk and Be Moved: How Walking Builds Social Movements,” Urban Affairs Review, June 2, doi: 10.1177/1078087413490395.
LeeTaeku. 2002. Mobilizing Public Opinion: Black Insurgency and Racial Attitudes in the Civil Rights Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
LernerGilda. 1980. The Majority Finds Its Past. New York: Oxford University Press.
MagdolEdward. 1986. The Antislavery Rank and File: A Social Profile of the Abolitionists’ Constituency. New York: Greenwood Press.
MargettsHelen, John Peter, Escher Tobias, and Reissfelder Stéphane. 2014. “Social Information and Political Participation on the Internet: An Experiment.” European Political Science Review, doi: 10.1017/S1755773911000129, April 24.
MarilleySuzanne. 1996. Woman Suffrage and the Origins of Liberal Feminism, 1820–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Martinez-EbersValerie, and Dorraj Manochehr. 2009. Perspectives on Race, Ethnicity and Religion: Identity Politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
McAdamDouglas. 1990. Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.
McAdamDoug. 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McPhersonJames M. 1967. The Struggle for Equality: Abolitionists and the Negro in the Civil War and Reconstruction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McPhersonJames M. 1975. The Abolitionist Legacy: From Reconstruction to the NAACP. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McPhersonJames M. 1988. Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. New York: Oxford University Press.
MettlerSuzanne. 2007. Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of America's Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.
MillerWilliam Lee. 1995. Arguing about Slavery: John Quincy Adams and the Great Battle in the United States Congress. New York: Vintage.
MoroneJames A. 2004. Hellfire Nation: The Politics of Sin in American History. New Haven: Yale University Press.
MutzDiana. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MutzDiana. 2002. “Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice.” American Political Science Review 96 (2): 111–26.
NeemJohann. 2008. Creating a Nation of Joiners: Democracy and Civil Society in Early National Massachusetts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
NortonAnne. 2004. 95 Theses on Politics, Culture and Method. New Haven: Yale University Press.
ParkerChristopher S. 2009a. “When Politics Becomes Protest: Black Veterans and Political Activism in the Postwar SouthJournal of Politics 71 (1): 113–31.
ParkerChristopher S. 2009b. Fighting for Democracy: Black Veterans and the Struggle against White Supremacy in the Postwar South. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
PortnoyAlisse. 2002. “‘A Right to Speak on the Subject’: The U.S. Women's Antiremoval Petition Campaign, 1829–31.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 5 (4): 601–24.
PortnoyAlisse. 2003. “‘Female Petitioners Can Lawfully Be Heard’: Negotiating Female Decorum, U.S. Politics, and Political Agency, 1829–31.” Journal of the Early Republic 23 (2003): 573610.
PortnoyAlisse. 2005. Their Right to Speak: Women's Activism in the Indian and Slave Debates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
RichardsLeonard L. 1970. “Gentleman of Property and Standing”: Anti-Abolition Mobs in Jacksonian America. New York: Oxford University Press.
SchererMichael. 2013. “Why the White House Loves Your Death Star Petition.” TIME, January 31.
SklarKathryn Kish. 2000. Women's Rights Emerges within the Antislavery Movement, 1830–1870. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.
SkocpolTheda. 2004. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
SkocpolTheda, Ganz Marshall, and Munson Ziad. 2000. “A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States.” American Political Science Review 94 (3): 527–46.
SmithMark A. 2002. “Ballot Initiatives and the Democratic Citizen.” Journal of Politics 64: 892903.
SossJoe. 1999. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 363–80.
StewartJames Brewer. 1997. Holy Warriors: The Abolitionists and American Slavery. New York: Hill and Wang.
SuedfeldPeter, Bochner Stephen, and Matas Carol. 1971. “Petitioner's Attire and Petition Signing by Peace Demonstrators: A Field Experiment.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1 (3): 278–83.
SzymanskiAnne-Marie E. 2003. Pathways to Prohibition: Radicals, Moderates and Social Movement Outcomes. Durham: Duke University Press.
TarrowSidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
ValentinoNicholas A., Gregorowicz Krysha, and Groenendyk Eric W.. 2009. “Efficacy, Emotions, and the Habit of Participation.” Political Behavior 31 (3): 307–30.
Van BroekhovenDeborah Bingham. 1994. “‘Let Your Names Be Enrolled’: Method and Ideology in Women's Antislavery Petitioning.” In The Abolitionist Sisterhood: Women's Political Culture in Antebellum America, eds. Yellin Jean Fagan and Horne John Van. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 179200.
Van BroekhovenDeborah Bingham. 2002. The Devotion of These Women: Rhode Island in the Antislavery Network. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
WalshKatherine Cramer. 2004. Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
WalshKatherine Cramer. 2006. “Applying Norton's Challenge to the Study of Political Behavior: Focus on Process, the Particular and the Ordinary.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (2): 353–59.
WalshKatherine Cramer. 2007. Talking about Race: Community Dialogues and the Politics of Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
WalshKatherine Cramer. 2012. “Putting Inequality in Its Place: Rural Consciousness and the Power of Perspective.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 517–32.
WellmanJudith. 1991. “The Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention: A Study in Social Networks.” Women's History 3 (1): 937.
WellmanJudith. 2004. The Road to Seneca Falls: Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the First Women's Rights Convention. Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
WilcoxAllen R., and Weinberg Leonard B.. 1977. “Petition Signing in the 1968 Election.” Western Political Quarterly 24 (4): 731–39.
YellinJean Fagan, and Van Horne John C., eds. 1994. The Abolitionist Sisterhood: Women's Political Culture in Antebellum America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
ZaeskeSusan. 2003. Signatures of Citizenship. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
ZallerJohn R. 2002. “The Statistical Power of Election Studies to Detect Media Exposure Effects in Political Campaigns.” Electoral Studies 21: 297329.
ZaretDavid. 2000. Origins of Democratic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
ZiblattDaniel. 2008. “Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The Case of Nineteenth Century Germany.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 121.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Carpenter supplementary material
Carpenter supplementary material

 PDF (614 KB)
614 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 23
Total number of PDF views: 292 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 940 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.