Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Application of captive bolt to cattle stunning – a survey of stunner placement under practical conditions

  • R. Fries (a1), K. Schrohe (a1), F. Lotz (a2) and G. Arndt (a2)
Abstract

In two cattle head deboning plants, a total of 8879 cattle skulls were investigated for number and precision of shots. Deviation from the ideal position on the forehead and the direction of the shot were measured, results were then attributed to three classes of precision. In all, 64.7% of the skulls in plant 1 and 65.3% in plant 2 were shot from the ideal position and in the ideal direction. A medium precision was observed in 31.3% and 31.5% of cases, 4.0% and 3.1%, respectively, of the skulls indicated a poor precision. In both plants, skulls with more than one shot hole were observed. Shot holes may indicate the precision of a shot, and thus the risk of suffering during the sensitive time of stunning. In addition to observations at the time of stunning, the observation of shot holes on skulls at random or in total after a day's slaughter can reflect the shooting precision.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Application of captive bolt to cattle stunning – a survey of stunner placement under practical conditions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Application of captive bolt to cattle stunning – a survey of stunner placement under practical conditions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Application of captive bolt to cattle stunning – a survey of stunner placement under practical conditions
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: fries.reinhard@vetmed.fu-berlin.de
References
Hide All
AHAW (Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare) 2004. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission Related to Welfare Aspects of the Main Systems of Stunning and Killing the Main Commercial Species of Animals. The EFSA Journal 45, 129.
EU 2004. Welfare aspects of animal stunning and killing methods. Scientific Report of the Scientific Panel for Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission Related to Welfare Aspects of Animal Stunning and Killing Methods (Question No. EFSA-Q-2003-093). Accepted on the 15th of June 2004. EFSA – AHAW/04-027.
FAO 2004. Good practices for the meat industry. Section 7, pp. 9, 14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Foundation Internationale Carrefour, Rome.
Finnie JW 1995. Neuropathological changes produced by non-penetrating percussive captive bolt stunning of cattle. New Zealand Veterinay Journal 43, 183185.
Gouveia KG, Ferreira PG, Roque da Costa JC, Vas-Pires P, Martins da Costa P 2009. Assessment of the efficiency of captive-bolt stunning in cattle and feasibility of associated behavioural signs. Animal Welfare 18, 171175.
Grandin T 1998. Objective scoring of animal handling and stunning practices at slaughter plants. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 212, 3639.
Grandin T 2002. Return-to-sensibility problems after penetrating captive bolt stunning of cattle in commercial beef slaughter plants. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 221, 12581261.
Gregory NG, Lee CJ, Widdicombe JP 2007. Depth of concussion in cattle shot by penetrating captive bolt. Meat Science 77, 499503.
Hagen U, Paulsen P, Smulders FJM, König HE 2002. Anatomische Überlegungen zur Bolzenschußbetäubung bei Schlachtrindern. Proceedings 43, pp. 109–113. Arbeitstagung des Arbeitsgebietes Lebensmittelhygiene der DVG, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
Ilgert H 1985. Effizienz der Bolzenschussbetäubung beim Rind mit Berücksichtigung der Einschussstelle und der Eindringrichtung des Bolzens unter Praxisbedingungen. Dissertation med. vet., Berlin, Germany, Journal No. 1263.
Kaegi B 1988. Untersuchungen zur Bolzenschussbetäubung beim Rind. Dissertation med.vet., Zürich, Switzerland.
Palmer AC 1982. Concussion: the result of impact injury to the brain. Veterinary Record 111, 575578.
Schrohe K unpublished. Schußpräzision bei der Bolzenschußbetäubung von Rindern. Dissertation med. vet., Berlin, Germany.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 80 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 169 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.