Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Meta-analysis on the effects of the physical environment, animal traits, feeder and feed characteristics on the feeding behaviour and performance of growing-finishing pigs

  • X. Averós (a1) (a2), L. Brossard (a1) (a2), J. Y. Dourmad (a1) (a2), K. H. de Greef (a3), S. A. Edwards (a4) and M. C. Meunier-Salaün (a1) (a2)...
Abstract

A meta-analysis, using information from 45 experiments on growing-finishing pigs published in 39 manuscripts, was carried out to determine the simultaneous effects of the physical environment (space allowance, group size, flooring conditions, temperature, presence of enrichment), pig traits (initial body weight (BW) for each studied time interval, sex, genetics), feeder characteristics (water provision within the feeder, feeder design (individual/collective), feeder places/pig, presence of feeder protection) and feed characteristics (feed allowance (ad libitum/restricted), net energy content, crude protein (CP) content), as well as their potential interactions, on the feeding behaviour and performance of growing-finishing pigs. The detrimental effect of low temperature on performance was particularly evident for restricted-fed pigs (P < 0.05). At reduced feeder space allowance, a reduction in the percentage of time spent eating was predicted when increasing initial BW, whereas the opposite was predicted for larger feeder space allowances (P < 0.001). The reduction in visit duration to the feeder in higher BW groups became gradually more important with increasing feeder space allowance (P < 0.01), whereas the increase in the ingestion rate and average daily feed intake (ADFI) with increasing initial BW became smaller with increasing feeder space (P < 0.05). The model predicted a reduction in feed conversion ratio (FCR) with increasing group size (P < 0.05) and floor space allowance (P < 0.01) and on solid floors with or without bedding (P < 0.05). In comparison with other feeders, wet/dry feeders were associated with more frequent but shorter feeder visits (P < 0.05), higher ingestion rates (P < 0.001) and higher ADFI (P < 0.10). The use of protection within individual feeders increased the time spent feeding (P < 0.001), reduced the number of visits per day (P < 0.01), the ingestion rate (P < 0.001) and FCR (P < 0.01) in comparison with other feeder types. Sex modulated the effect of the number of feeder places/pig on FCR (P < 0.05), with a gradual reduction of FCR in entire males and females when increasing feeder space allowance. Genetics tended to modulate the effect of diets’ CP content on FCR (P < 0.10). Overall, these results may contribute to the improvement of the welfare and performance of growing-finishing pigs by a better knowledge of the influence of the rearing environment and may help optimize the feeding strategies in current production systems.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Meta-analysis on the effects of the physical environment, animal traits, feeder and feed characteristics on the feeding behaviour and performance of growing-finishing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Meta-analysis on the effects of the physical environment, animal traits, feeder and feed characteristics on the feeding behaviour and performance of growing-finishing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Meta-analysis on the effects of the physical environment, animal traits, feeder and feed characteristics on the feeding behaviour and performance of growing-finishing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: Ludovic.Brossard@rennes.inra.fr
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

AJA Aarnink , JW Schrama , MJW Heetkamp , J Stefanowska , TTT Huynh 2006. Temperature and body weight affect fouling of pig pens. Journal of Animal Science 84, 22242231.

P Affentranger , C Gerwig , GJF Seewer , D Schwörer , N Künzi 1996. Growth and carcass characteristics as well as meat and fat quality of three types of pigs under different feeding regimens. Livestock Production Science 45, 187196.

NR Augspurger , M Ellis , DN Hamilton , BF Wolter , JL Beverly , ER Wilson 2002. The effect of sire line on the feeding patterns of grow–finish pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75, 103114.

X Averós , L Brossard , JY Dourmad , K de Greef , HL Edge , SA Edwards , MC Meunier-Salaün 2010b. A meta-analysis of the combined effect of housing and environmental enrichment characteristics on the behaviour and performance of pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 127, 7385.

JAM Botermans , J Svendsen 2000. Effect of feeding environment on performance, injuries and behaviour in growing-finishing pigs: group-based studies.. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science 50, 237249.

EM Bruininx , CM van der Peet-Schwering , JW Schrama , PF Vereijken , PC Vesseur , H Everts , LA den Hartog , AC Beynen 2001. Individually measured feed intake characteristics and growth performance of group-housed weanling pigs: effects of sex, initial body weight, and body weight distribution within groups. Journal of Animal Science 79, 301308.

R Christon 1988. The effect of tropical ambient temperature on growth and metabolism in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 66, 31123123.


LCM de Haer , AG de Vries 1993a. Feed intake patterns of and feed digestibility in growing pigs housed individually or in groups. Livestock Production Science 33, 277292.

LCM de Haer , AG de Vries 1993b. Effects of genotype and sex on the feed intake pattern of group housed growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 36, 223232.

LCM de Haer , P Luiting , HLM Aarts 1993. Relations among individual (residual) feed intake, growth performance and feed intake pattern of growing pigs in group housing. Livestock Production Science 36, 233253.



DB Edwards , RJ Tempelman , RO Bates 2006. Evaluation of Duroc- vs. Pietrain-sired pigs for growth and composition. Journal of Animal Science 84, 266275.

L Georgsson , J Svendsen 2001. One or two feeders for groups of 16 growing-finishing pigs: effects on health and production. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science 51, 257264.


HW Gonyou , Z Lou 2000. Effects of eating space and availability of water in feeders on productivity and eating behaviour of grower/finisher pigs. Journal of Animal Science 78, 865870.

HW Gonyou , MC Brumm , E Bush , J Deen , SA Edwards , T Fangman , JJ McGlone , MC Meunier-Salaün , RB Morrison , H Spoolder , PL Sundberg , AK Johnson 2006. Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower–finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis. Journal of Animal Science 84, 229235.

H Heitman Jr, R Hahn , CF Kelly , TE Bond 1961. Space allotment and performance of growing-finishing swine raised in confinement. Journal of Animal Science 20, 543546.

LC Hsia , DGM Wood-Gush 1984. The temporal patterns of food intake and allelomimetic feeding by pigs of different ages. Applied Animal Ethology 11, 271282.

Y Hyun , M Ellis 2001. Effect of group size and feeder type on growth performance and feeding patterns in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 79, 803810.

Y Hyun , M Ellis 2002. Effect of group size and feeder type on growth performance and feeding patterns in finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80, 568574.

Y Hyun , M Ellis , FK McKeith , ER Wilson 1997. Feed intake pattern of group-housed growing-finishing pigs monitored using a computerized feed intake recording system. Journal of Animal Science 75, 14431451.

Y Hyun , M Ellis , RW Johnson 1998. Effects of feeder type, space allowance, and mixing on the growth performance and feed intake pattern of growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76, 27712778.

Y Hyun , BF Wolter , M Ellis 2001. Feed intake patterns and growth performance of purebred and crossbred Meishan and Yorkshire pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 14, 837843.

J Le Dividich , J Noblet , T Bikawa 1987. Effect of environmental temperature and dietary energy concentration in the performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs fed to equal rate of gain. Livestock Production Science 17, 235246.

KA Leymaster , HJ Mersmann 1991. Effects of limited feed intake on growth of subcutaneous adipose tissue layers and on carcass composition in swine. Journal of Animal Science 69, 28372843.

J Lopez , GW Jesse , BA Becker , MR Ellersieck 1991b. Effects of temperature on the performance of finishing swine: II. Effects of a cold, diurnal temperature on average daily gain, feed intake, and feed efficiency. Journal of Animal Science 69, 18501855.

RW May , JM Bell 1971. Digestible and metabolizable energy values of some feeds for the growing pig. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51, 271278.

P McGloughlin , P Allen , PV Tarrant , RL Joseph , PB Lynch , TJ Hanrahan 1988. Growth and carcass quality of crossbred pigs sired by Duroc, Landrace and Large White boars. Livestock Production Science 18, 275288.

RS Morrison , PH Hemsworth , GM Cronin , RG Campbell 2003a. The effect of restricting pen space and feeder availability on the behaviour and growth performance of entire male growing pigs in a deep-litter, large group housing system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 83, 163176.

RS Morrison , PH Hemsworth , GM Cronin , RG Campbell 2003b. The social and feeding behaviour of growing pigs in deep-litter, large group housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82, 173188.



BL Nielsen , AB Lawrence , CT Whittemore 1995b. Effect of group size on feeding behaviour, social behaviour, and performance of growing pigs using single-space feeders. Livestock Production Science 44, 7385.

BL Nielsen , AB Lawrence , CT Whittemore 1996. Feeding behaviour of growing pigs using single or multi-space feeders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 47, 235246.

JC Petherick , CJC Phillips 2009. Space allowances for confined livestock and their determination from allometric principles. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 117, 112.

N Quiniou , S Dubois , J Noblet 2000. Voluntary feed intake and feeding behaviour of group-housed growing pigs are affected by ambient temperature and body weight. Livestock Production Science 63, 245253.

PJL Ramaekers , JWGM Swinkels , JH Huiskes , MWA Verstegen 1999. Eating traits in relation to performance and carcass traits of restrictedly fed group-housed finishing pigs. Animal Science 68, 399405.

D Renaudeau 2009. Effect of housing conditions (clean vs. dirty) on growth performance and feeding behaviour in growing pigs in a tropical climate. Tropical Animal Health and Production 41, 559563.

D Rinaldo , J Le Dividich 1991. Assessment of optimal temperature for performance and chemicals body composition of growing pigs. Livestock Science 29, 6175.

HAM Spoolder , SA Edwards , S Corning 1999. Effects of group size and feeder space allowance on welfare of finishing pigs. Animal Science 69, 481489.

NR St-Pierre 2001. Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 741755.

TS Stahly , GL Cromwell , MP Aviotti 1979. The effect of environmental temperature and dietary lysine source and level on the performance and carcass characteristics of growing swine. Journal of Animal Science 49, 12421251.

BR Street , HW Gonyou 2008. Effects of housing finishing pigs in two group sizes and at two floor space allocations on production, health, behaviour, and physiological variables. Journal of Animal Science 86, 982991.

SP Turner , SA Edwards , VC Bland 1999. The influence of drinker allocation and group size on the drinking behaviour, welfare and production of growing pigs. Animal Science 68, 617624.

SP Turner , AG Sinclair , SA Edwards 2000. The interaction of liveweight and the degree of competition on drinking behaviour in growing pigs at different group sizes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67, 321334.

SP Turner , M Dahlgren , DS Arey , SA Edwards 2002. Effect of social group size and initial live weight on feeder space requirement of growing pigs given food ad libitum. Animal Science 75, 7583.

SP Turner , DJ Allcroft , SA Edwards 2003. Housing pigs in large social groups: a review of implications for performance and other economic traits. Livestock Production Science 82, 3951.

HA Van de Weerd , JEL Day 2009. A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 120.

N Walker 1991. The effects on performance and behaviour of number of growing pigs per mono-place feeder. Animal Feed Science and Technology 35, 313.

IJ Wellock , GC Emmans , I Kyriazakis 2003. Predicting the consequences of social stressors on pig food intake and performance. Journal of Animal Science 81, 29953007.

BF Wolter , M Ellis , SE Curtis , NR Augspurger , DN Hamilton , EN Parr , DM Webel 2001. Effect of group size on pig performance in a wean-to-finish production system. Journal of Animal Science 79, 10671073.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: