Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Perceptions of the importance of different welfare issues in livestock production

  • C. J. C. Phillips (a1), J. Wojciechowska (a1), J. Meng (a1) and N. Cross (a1)
Abstract

The opinions of seven respondent groups about the relative importance of different practices pertaining to the welfare of Australian beef cattle, sheep and goats were surveyed. Respondent groups comprised farmers, livestock transportation representatives, veterinarians, meat processors, animal welfare advocates, animal welfare scientists and government officers. The survey consisted of a web-based adaptive conjoint analysis questionnaire, which was administered to a sample population that was selected randomly for large respondent groups and comprehensively for small groups. The hierarchy of opinion concerning the importance of the different beef cattle practices was: stockmanship > ground (road and rail) transport > spaying > food supply > dehorning > stunning > shelter > identification > pretransport food and water deprivation > castration > sea transport > mustering > confinement. For sheep/goat practices the hierarchy was: parasite control > mulesing > shelter > stockmanship > tail docking > ground transport > feeding > predation > stunning > castration > pretransport food and water deprivation > sea transport > mustering. The method of performing invasive procedures was perceived as less important than the provision of pain relief. Differences in opinion were evident between respondent groups, with animal welfare advocates tending to focus on painful procedures more than those with direct involvement in the industry.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Perceptions of the importance of different welfare issues in livestock production
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Perceptions of the importance of different welfare issues in livestock production
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Perceptions of the importance of different welfare issues in livestock production
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: c.phillips@uq.edu.au
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J Abernethy , T Evgeniou , O Toubia 2008. Eliciting consumer preferences using robust adaptive choice questionnaires. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 20, 145155.

PJ Eastwood 1995. Farm animal welfare, Europe and the meat manufacturer. British Food Journal 97, 411.

LA González , A Ferret , X Manteca , JL Rúiz-de-la-Torre , S Calsamiglia , M Devant , A Bach 2008. Effect of the number of concentrate feed places per pen on performance, behaviour and welfare indicators of Friesian calves during the first month after arrival at the feedlot. Journal of Animal Science 86, 419431.

N Gregory 2004. Physiology and behaviour of animal suffering. Blackwell Scientific Press, Oxford, UK.

JP Hogan , JC Petherick , CJC Phillips 2007. The nutritional impact on sheep and cattle of feed and water deprivation prior to and during transport. Nutrition Research Reviews 20, 113.

SM Kongsved , M Basnov , K Holm-Christensen 2007. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 9, article number e25.

DR Paull , I Colditz , C Lee , SJ Atkinson , A Fisher 2008. Effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and epidural anaesthesia in reducing the pain and stress responses to a surgical husbandry procedure (mulesing) in sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 10341039.

JC Petherick 2005. Animal welfare issues associated with extensive livestock production: the northern Australian beef cattle industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, 211234.

GM Pettitford , DM Ferguson , JM Lea , C Lee , DR Paul , MT Reid , GM Hinch , AD Fisher 2008. Effects of loading practices and six-hour road transport on the physiological responses of yearling cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 10281033.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: