Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Hot-water spraying is a sensitive test for signs of life before dressing and scalding in pig abattoirs with carbon dioxide (CO2) stunning

  • S. Parotat (a1) (a2), K. von Holleben (a1), S. Arnold (a3), K. Troeger (a3) and E. Luecker (a2)...
Abstract

This study investigated the benefits of hot-water spraying (HWS) as a diagnostic test to verify the absence of signs of life (SOL) before scalding in pigs slaughtered with carbon dioxide (CO2) stunning. A total of 37 108 finishing pigs from five German abattoirs (A to E) operating at 55 to 571 pigs per hour were assessed. Suspended pigs were sprayed onto the muzzle, head and front legs (143 to 258 s post sticking for 4 to 10 s, 57°C to 72°C). Any active movements during HWS were rated as positive test outcomes. In comparison, SOL were considered to be absent if a subsequent manual examination was negative and no active movements were observed following HWS. The incidence of pigs with activity during hot-water spraying (PWA) was restricted to two abattoirs (B: 0.25%; D: 0.02%; A, C, E: 0.00%). PWA showed movements of facial muscles (88%), mouth opening (78%), righting reflex (63%), isolated leg movements (35%) and vocalization (4%). The manual examination was positive in 71% of PWA (corneal/dazzle reflex: 67%/53%, nasal septum pinch: 33%), whereas all inactive pigs tested negative (P<0.001). The sensitivity for HWS as a test for SOL was calculated as 100%, dropping to 75% when only obvious and strong movements were taken into account. The specificity was >99.9% in either case. Any positive manual findings as well as any respiratory activity were instantly terminated using a penetrating captive bolt. Active movements triggered by the shot were shown to be an indicator for SOL (P<0.001). Video analyses revealed that spontaneous movements (SM) following sticking were present in 100% of PWA as opposed to 3.1% in pigs without such activity (controls). Results for different categories of SM in PWA v. controls were as follows: 100% v. 2.6% for mouth opening, 16.0% v. 0.1% for righting reflex and 22.0% v. 0.9% for isolated leg movements (all P<0.001). First mouth opening after sticking was observed later in PWA (28±24 v. 10±7 s), but mouth openings were observed for a longer period of time (141±44 v. 27±25 s) (both P<0.001). PWA with shorter mouth-opening intervals showed higher movement intensities during HWS and more positive manual findings (P<0.05). We conclude that HWS is a promising test for SOL. SM and sustained mouth opening in particular are indicators for compromised animal welfare and affected pigs should be shot by captive bolt.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Hot-water spraying is a sensitive test for signs of life before dressing and scalding in pig abattoirs with carbon dioxide (CO2) stunning
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Hot-water spraying is a sensitive test for signs of life before dressing and scalding in pig abattoirs with carbon dioxide (CO2) stunning
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Hot-water spraying is a sensitive test for signs of life before dressing and scalding in pig abattoirs with carbon dioxide (CO2) stunning
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: sp@bsi-schwarzenbek.de
References
Hide All
Alkire MT, Hudetz AG and Tononi G 2008. Consciousness and anesthesia. Science 322, 876880.
Anil MH, Whittington PE and McKinstry JL 2000. The effect of the sticking method on the welfare of slaughter pigs. Meat Science 55, 315319.
Antognini JF, Barter L and Carstens E 2005. Overview - movement as an index of anesthetic depth in humans and experimental animals. Comparative Medicine 55, 413418.
Arnold S, Parotat S, Moje M, Machtolf M, von Wenzlawowicz M, Troeger K and Luecker E 2014. Ascertaining death in pig slaughter using hot water. Paper presented at the 60th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, August 17-22, 2014, Punta del Este, Uruguay.
Atkinson S, Velarde A, Llonch P and Algers B 2012. Assessing pig welfare at stunning in Swedish commercial abattoirs using CO2 group-stun methods. Animal Welfare 21, 487495.
Blackmore DK and Newhook JC 1981. Insensibility during slaughter of pigs in comparison to other domestic stock. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 29, 219222.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 2009. EC of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. Official Journal of the European Union L 303, 130.
EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) 2013. Scientific opinion on monitoring procedures at slaughterhouses for pigs. EFSA Journal 11, 162.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2004. Opinion of the scientific panel on animal health and welfare on a request from the commission related to welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning and killing the main commercial species of animals. EFSA Journal 45, 129.
Forslid A 1987. Transient neocortical, hippocampal and amygdaloid EEG silence induced by one minute inhalation of high concentration CO2 in swine. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 130, 110.
Grandin T 2013. Making slaughterhouses more humane for cattle, pigs, and sheep. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences 1, 491512.
Humane Slaughter Association 2014. Novel or improved methods of detecting un/consciousness in animals after stunning. HSA workshop report, workshop held on 18 June 2014, London, UK. Retrieved February 10, 2015, from http://www.hsa.org.uk/downloads/hsaworkshop18june14.pdf.
Llonch P, Rodriguez P, Jospin M, Dalmau A, Manteca X and Velarde A 2013. Assessment of unconsciousness in pigs during exposure to nitrogen and carbon dioxide mixtures. Animal 7, 492498.
Lykke L, Arnmark P and Borggaard C 2010. One incident every twentieth year – system to control successful sticking at the slaughter line. Fleischwirtschaft International 25, 1012.
Martoft L, Stodkilde-Jorgensen H, Forslid A, Pedersen HD and Jorgensen PF 2003. CO2 induced acute respiratory acidosis and brain tissue intracellular pH: a 31P NMR study in swine. Laboratory Animals 37, 241248.
Rodríguez P, Dalmau A, Ruiz-de-la-Torre JL, Manteca X, Jensen EW, Rodríguez B, Litvan H and Velarde A 2008. Assessment of unconsciousness during carbon dioxide stunning in pigs. Animal Welfare 17, 341349.
Schweiger A, Fischer J and Troeger K 2013. Optimal positioning of the sticking incision: investigation of the manner and extent of vessel lesions along the sticking canal in slaughter pigs. Fleischwirtschaft International 28, 2832.
Troeger K 2011. Supervision of an effective sticking and bleeding of slaughter pigs by means of an infrared camera. Fleischwirtschaft 91, 119122.
Troeger K and Meiler D 2006. Development of a method for use under practical conditions to examine the killing of slaughter pigs by exsanguination (feasibility study). Mitteilungsblatt der Fleischforschung Kulmbach 45, 1522.
Verhoeven MT, Gerritzen MA, Hellebrekers LJ and Kemp B 2015. Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a review. Animal 9, 320330.
Von Wenzlawowicz M, von Holleben K and Eser E 2012. Identifying reasons for stun failures in slaughterhouses for cattle and pigs: a field study. Animal Welfare 21, 5160.
Woods J 2012. Analysis of the use of the “CASH” Dispatch Kit captive bolt gun as a single stage euthanasia process for pigs. Thesis MS, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Wotton SB and Gregory NG 1986. Pig slaughtering procedures: time to loss of brain responsiveness after exsanguination or cardiac arrest. Research in Veterinary Science 40, 148151.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 111 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 320 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.