Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms

  • H. Telkänranta (a1), J. N. Marchant-Forde (a2) and A. Valros (a1)
Abstract

Tear staining or chromodacryorrhea refers to a dark stain below the inner corner of the eye, caused by porphyrin-pigmented secretion from the Harderian gland. It has been shown to be a consistent indicator of stress in rats and to correlate with social stress and a barren environment in pigs. The current study was, to our knowledge, the first to test it on commercial pig farms as a potential welfare indicator. The study was carried out on three commercial farms in Finland, in connection to a larger study on the effects of different types of manipulable objects on tail and ear biting and other behavioural parameters. Farm A was a fattening farm, on which 768 growing-finishing pigs were studied in 73 pens. Farm B had a fattening unit, in which 656 growing-finishing pigs were studied in 44 pens, and a farrowing unit, in which 29 sows and their litters totalling 303 piglets were studied in 29 pens. Farm C was a piglet-producing farm, on which 167 breeder gilts were studied in 24 pens. Data collection included individual-level scoring of tear staining; scoring of tail and ear damage in the growing-finishing pigs and breeder gilts; a novel object test for the piglets; and a novel person test for the growing-finishing pigs on Farm B and the breeder gilts on Farm C. On Farm A, tear staining was found to correlate with tail damage scores (n=768, r s =0.14, P<0.001) and ear damage scores (n=768, r s =0.16, P<0.001). In the growing-finishing pigs on Farm B, tear staining of the left eye correlated with tail damage (n=656, r s =0.12, P<0.01) and that of the right eye correlated with ear damage (n=656, r s =0.10, P<0.01). On Farm A, tear-staining sores were lower in the treatment with three different types of manipulable objects as compared with controls (mean scores 3.3 and 3.9, respectively, n=31, F 29=4.2, P<0.05). In the suckling piglets on Farm B, tear staining correlated with the latency to approach a novel object (n=29, r p =0.41, P<0.05). Although correlations with tail and ear damage were low, it was concluded that tear staining has promising potential as a new, additional welfare indicator for commercial pig farming. Further research is needed on the mechanisms of tear staining.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: helena.telkanranta@helsinki.fi
References
Hide All
Andreasen SN, Sandøe P and Forkman B 2014. Can animal-based welfare assessment be simplified? A comparison of the Welfare Quality® protocol for dairy cattle and the simpler and less time-consuming protocol developed by the Danish Cattle Federation. Animal Welfare 23, 8194.
Botreau R, Bonde M, Butterworth A, Perny P, Bracke MBM, Capdeville J and Veissier I 2007. Aggregation of measures to prodice an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 1: a review of existing methods. Animal 1, 11791187.
Buzzell GR, Menedez-Pelaez A, Blank JL, Nonaka KO and Reiter RJ 1991. Effects of gender, age and castration on porphyrin concentration and melatonin synthesis in the Harderian glands of the Mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus . Canadian Journal of Zoology 69, 151155.
Chieffi G, Baccari GC, Di Matteo L, d’Istria M, Minucci S and Varriale B 1996. Cell biology of the Harderian gland. International Review of Cytology 168, 180.
D’Eath RB, Arnott G, Turner SP, Jensen T, Lahrmann HP, Busch ME, Niemi JK, Lawrence AB and Sandøe P 2014. Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking? Animal 8, 14791497.
DeBoer SP, Garner JP, McCain RR, Lay DC Jr, Eicher SD and Marchant-Forde JN 2015. An initial investigation into the effects of social isolation and enrichment on the welfare of laboratory pigs housed in the PigTurn system, assessed using tear staining, behaviour, physiology and haematology. Animal Welfare 24, 1527.
DeBoer SP and Marchant-Forde JN 2013. Tear staining as a potential welfare indicator in pigs. The Proceedings of the 47th Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Florianopolis, Brazil, 125 pp.
Gruber T 2002. Housing, feeding, hygienic conditions, health and management of finishing pigs in organic farming units. PhD thesis, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Harkness JE and Ridgway MD 1980. Chromodacryorrhea in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus); etiologic considerations. Laboratory Animal Science 30, 841844.
Jackson PGG and Cockroft PD 2007. Handbook of pig medicine. Saunders, London, UK.
Leliveld LMC, Langbein J and Puppe B 2013. The emergence of emotional lateralization: evidence in non-human vertebrates and implications for farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 145, 114.
Marchant-Forde AEM and Marchant-Forde JN 2014. Social status and tear staining in nursery pigs. The Proceedings of the 48th Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, 145 pp.
Mason G, Wilson D, Hampton C and Wurbel H 2004. Non-invasively assessing disturbance and stress in laboratory rats by scoring chromodacryorrhoea. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 32, 153159.
McCafferty RE and Pinkstaff CA 1970. A study of sexual dimorphism in Harderian glands of the miniature pig. Anatomical Record 166, 340.
Munsterhjelm C, Brunberg E, Heinonen M, Keeling L and Valros A 2013. Stress measures in tail biters and bitten pigs in a matched case-control study. Animal Welfare 22, 331338.
OIE 2012. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals, vol. 2, 7th edition. OIE, Paris, France.
Park SH, Satoh Y, Kumagai S and Seyama Y 1996. Localization of porphyrin in mouse Harderian glands. Archives of Histology and Cytology 59, 189195.
Rodriguez C, Menedez-Pelaez A, Howes K and Reiter RJ 1992. Age and food restriction alter the porphyrin concentration and mRNA levels for 5-aminoevulinate synthase in rat Harderian gland. Life Sciences 51, 18911897.
Smulders D, Hautekiet V, Verbeke G and Geers R 2008. Tail and ear biting lesions in pigs: an epidemiological study. Animal Welfare 17, 6169.
Straw BE, Dewey CE and Wilson MR 2006. Differential diagnosis of disease. In Diseases of swine, 9th edition (eds Straw BE, Zimmerman JJ, D’Allaire S and Taylor DJ), pp. 241286. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
Studnitz M, Jensen MB and Pedersen LJ 2007. Why do pigs root and in what will they root? A review on the exploratory behaviour of pigs in relation to environmental enrichment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 107, 183197.
Taylor NR, Main DCJ, Mendl M and Edwards SA 2010. Tail-biting: a new perspective. The Veterinary Journal 186, 137147.
Telkänranta H, Bracke MBM and Valros A 2014a. Fresh wood reduces tail and ear biting and increases exploratory behaviour in finishing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 161, 5159.
Telkänranta H, Bracke MBM and Valros A 2014b. Fresh wood, plastic pipe or metal chain – which objects reduce tail and ear biting on commercial pig farms? The Proceedings of the 48th Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, 282 pp.
Telkänranta H, Bracke MBM and Valros A 2014c. Reducing oral-nasal manipulation on commercially farmed pigs: fresh wood enhances the efficacy of straw. The Proceedings of the VII European Conference on Behavioural Biology, Prague, Czech Republic, 221 pp.
Vallortigara G and Rogers L 2005. Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behavioral Brain Sciences 28, 575589.
Valros A, Munsterhjelm C, Puolanne E, Ruusunen M, Heinonen M, Peltonemi O and Pösö R 2013. Tail bitten slaughter pigs show alterations in stress physiology and carcass characteristics. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 55, 75.
Wetterberg L, Yuwiler A, Geller E and Schapiro S 1970. Harderian gland: development and influence of early hormonal treatment on porphyrin content. Science 168, 996998.
Whay HR, Leeb C, Main DJC, Green LE and Webster JF 2007. Preliminary assessment of finishing pig welfare using animal-based measurements. Animal Welfare 16, 209211.
Wright AJ 2012. Animal welfare assessment in veterinary education: its theory and practical application to domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica). PhD thesis, University of London, London, UK.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 22
Total number of PDF views: 218 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 702 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.