Skip to main content

Review of Child Second Language Acquisition (SLA): Examining Theories and Research

  • Rhonda Oliver (a1) and Agurtzane Azkarai (a2)

Within the field of second language acquisition (SLA), there has been much less research undertaken with children than with adults, yet the two cohorts are quite distinct in characteristics and in their learning processes. This article provides a review of child SLA research, particularly the research with a pedagogical focus. We describe a series of studies, including those informed by different theoretical perspectives (interactionist and sociocultural), in different instructional settings (i.e., second language, foreign language, immersion, and content and language integrated learning [CLIL] contexts) and using different research methodologies (longitudinal, case study, experimental, and naturalistic). We begin by highlighting the importance of age as a factor in SLA research, presenting studies that have focused on the differences existing between younger and older learners. We also consider interventions that can support language learning—including form-focused instruction and the use of tasks. We finish by presenting a proposed change in the way that research with children is conducted.

Hide All
Abrahamsson N., & Hyltenstam K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30 (4), 481509.
Alderson P. (2008). Children as researchers: Participation rights and research methods. In Christensen P. & James A. (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (pp. 276290). London, UK: Routledge.
Alerby E., & Kostenius C. (2011). Damned taxi cab—How silent communication in questionnaires can be understood and used to give voice to children's experiences. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 34 (2), 117130.
Antón M., & DiCamilla F. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314342.
Azkarai A., & García Mayo M. P. (2016). Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research. doi:10.1177/1362168816654169
Azkarai A., & Imaz Agirre A. (2016). Negotiation of meaning strategies in child EFL mainstream and CLIL settings. TESOL Quarterly, 50 (4), 844870.
Azkarai A., & Oliver R. (2016). Negative feedback on task repetition: ESL vs. EFL child settings. Language Learning Journal. doi:10.1080/09571736.2016.1196385
Bouffard L. A., & Sarkar M. (2008). Training 8-year-old French immersion students in metalinguistic analysis: An innovation in form-focused pedagogy. Language Awareness, 17 (1), 324.
Brinton D. (2003). Content-based instruction. In Nunan D. (Ed.), Practical English language teaching (pp. 199224). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Butler Y. G., & Zeng W. (2014). Young foreign language learners’ interactions during task-based paired assessments. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11, 4575.
Butler Y. G., & Zeng W. (2015). Young learners’ interactional development in task-based paired-assessment in their first and foreign languages: A case of English learners in China. Education 3–13, 44 (3), 292321.
Bygate M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In Bygate M., Skehan P., & Swain M. (Eds.), Task-based learning: Language teaching, learning, and assessment (pp. 2348). London, UK: Longman.
Cameron L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chaudron C. (1988). Second language classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Choi S. Y., & Li S. (2012). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in a child ESOL classroom. RELC Journal, 43 (3), 331351.
Christensen P., & Prout A. (2002). Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood, 9 (4), 477497.
Coppock K. (2010). Children as peer researchers: Reflections on a journey of mutual discovery. Children and Society, 25 (6), 435446.
Coyle D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 543562.
Dalton-Puffer C. (2011). Content and language integrated learning: From practice to principles. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182204.
Day E., & Shapson S. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French Immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 41, 2558.
DeKeyser R. M. (2013). Age effects in second language learning: Stepping stones toward better understanding. Language Learning, 63 (1), 5267.
Dulay H., & Burt M. (1974). A new perspective on the creative construction process in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24 (2), 253278.
Edelenbos P., Johnstone R. M., & Kubanek A. (2006). The main pedagogical principles underlying the teaching of languages to very young learners: Languages for the children of Europe: Published research, good practice and main principles (Final Report of the EAC 89/04, Lot 1 Study). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
Ellis R. (1984). Formulaic speech in early classroom second language development. In Handscombe J., Orem R., & Taylor B. (Eds.), On TESOL ’83: The question of control (pp. 5365). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Ellis R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ellis R. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20 (3), 405428.
Ellis R., & Heimbach R. (1997). Bugs and birds: Children's acquisition of second language vocabulary through interaction. System, 2, 247259.
Enever J., Moon J., & Raman U. (Eds.) (2009). Young learner English language policy and implementation: International perspectives. Reading, UK: Garnet Education.
García Mayo M. P., & Imaz Agirre A. (2016). Task repetition and its impact on EFL children's negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: An exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal, 44 (4), 451466.
García Mayo M. P., Imaz Agirre A., & Azkarai A. (in press). Task repetition in EFL child oral interaction. In Ahmadian M. & García Mayo M. P. (Eds.), Recent perspectives on task-based language learning and teaching. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
García Mayo M. P., & García Lecumberri M. L. (2003). Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
García Mayo M. P., & Lázaro Ibarrola A. (2015). Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 54, 4054.
Harley B. (1998). Issues in designing form-focused L2 tasks for children. In Doughty C. & Williams J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (pp. 156174). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Holland S., Renold E., Ross N., & Hillman A. (2010). Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people's engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood, 17, 360375.
Hyder T. (2002). Making it happen: Young children's rights in action. In Franklin B. (Ed.), The new handbook of children's rights: Comparative policy and practice (pp. 311327). London, UK: Routledge.
Ito S. (1997). Nenshoosha nihongo gakushuusha no koobun shuutoku: Juudanteki jiree kenkyuu. Hokkaidoo Daigaku Ryuugakusei Sentaa Kiyoo, 1, 6882.
Iwasaki J. (2008). Acquiring Japanese as a second language (JSL) in a naturalistic context. In Philp J., Oliver R., & Mackey A. (Eds.), Second language acquisition and the younger learner: Child's play? (pp. 231254). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Jia G., & Aaronson D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131161.
Jia G., & Fuse A. (2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents: Age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 12801299.
Kellett M. (2010). Small shoes, big steps! Empowering children as active researchers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46 (1–2), 195203.
Lansdown G. (2002). Promoting children's participation in democratic decision-making. Florence, Italy: Innocenti Research Centre, UNICEF.
Lasagabaster D., & Sierra J. M. (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64 (4), 367375.
Lenneberg E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York, NY: Wiley.
Lewis G. (2004). The internet and young learners. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lightbown P., Halter R., White J., & Horst M. (2002). Comprehension-based learning: The limits of “do it yourself.” Canadian Modern Language Review, 58 (3), 427464.
Lightbown P., & Spada N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12 (4), 429448.
Lightbown P., & Spada N. (1993). How languages are learned. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Long M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), 126141.
Long M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie W. C. & Bhatia T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–168). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Lyster R. (1998). Recasts, repetition and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 5181.
Lyster R. (2001). Negotiation of form, recasts and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 51, 265301.
Lyster R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399432.
Lyster R., & Mori H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (2), 269300.
Lyster R., & Ranta L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 3766.
Mackey A., & Gass S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mackey A., Kanganas A. P., & Oliver R. (2007). Task familiarity and interactional feedback in child ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 41 (2), 285312.
Mackey A., & Oliver R. (2002). Interactional feedback and children's L2 development. System, 30, 459477.
Mackey A., Oliver R., & Leeman J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 3566.
Mackey A., & Philp J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338356.
Mackey A., & Silver R. E. (2005). Interactional tasks and English L2 learning by immigrant children in Singapore. System, 33, 239260.
Muñoz C. (Ed.). (2006a). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Muñoz C. (2006b). The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF Project. In Muñoz C. (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning. (pp. 140) Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Muñoz C. (2007). Age-related differences and second language learning practice. In DeKeyser R. M. (Ed.), Practice in a second language (pp. 229255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Muñoz C. (2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 29, 578596.
Muñoz C. (2014a). Contrasting effects of starting age and input on the oral performance of foreign language learners. Applied Linguistics, 35 (4), 463482.
Muñoz C. (2014b). Exploring young learners’ foreign language learning awareness. Language Awareness, 23 (1–2), 2440.
Myles F., & Mitchell R. (2012). Learning French from ages 5, 7 and 11: An investigation into starting ages, rates and routes of learning amongst early foreign language learner (ESRC Impact Report, RES-062-23-1545). Swindon, UK: Economic and Social Research Council.
Nicholas H., & Lightbown P. M. (2008). Defining child second language acquisition, defining roles for L2 instruction. In Philp J., Oliver R., & Mackey A. (Eds.), Second language acquisition and the younger learner: Child's play? (pp. 2751). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Nikolov M. (1999). “Why do you learn English?” “Because the teacher is short.” A study of Hungarian children's foreign language learning motivation. Language Teaching Research, 3 (1), 3356.
Nikolov M. (Ed.). (2016). Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Nikolov M., & Mihaljević Djigunović J. (2006). Recent research on age, second language acquisition, and early foreign language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 234260.
Nikolov M., & Mihaljević Djigunović J. (2011). All shades of every color: An overview of early teaching and learning of foreign languages. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 95119.
Nikolov M., Mihaljević Djigunović J., Mattheoudakis M., Lundberg G., & Flanagan T. (Eds.). (2007). Teaching modern languages to young learners: Teachers, curricula and materials. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
Ojima S., Matsuba-Kurita H., Nakamura N., Hoshino T., & Hagiwara H. (2011). Age and amount of exposure to a foreign language during childhood: Behavioral and ERP data on the semantic comprehension of spoken English by Japanese children. Neuroscience Research, 70, 197205
Oliver R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459481.
Oliver R. (1998). Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 82 (3), 372386.
Oliver R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50 (1), 119151.
Oliver R. (2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 86 (1), 97111.
Oliver R. (2009). How young is too young? Investigating negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in children aged five to seven years. In Mackey A. & Polio C. (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language interaction research in honour of Sue M. Gass (pp. 135156). London, UK: Routledge.
Oliver R., & Grote E. (2010). The provision and uptake of different types of recasts in child and adult ESL learners: What is the role of age and context? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33 (3), 26.126.22.
Oliver R., & Mackey A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 87 (4), 519533.
Paradis J. (2007). Second language acquisition in childhood. In Hoff E. & Shatz M. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of language development (pp. 387406). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Philp J., Oliver R., & Mackey A. (Eds.). (2008). Second language acquisition and the young learner: Child's play? Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Pienemann M. (1998). Language processing and second-language development: Processibility theory. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Pinter A. (2006). Verbal evidence of task related strategies: Child versus adult interactions. System, 34, 615630.
Pinter A. (2007). Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practising with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11, 189207.
Pinter A. (2014). Child participant roles in applied linguistics research. Applied Linguistics, 35 (2), 168183.
Pinter A., Kuchah K., & Smith R. (2013). Researching with children. ELT Journal, 67 (4), 484487.
Pinter A., & Zandian S. (2014). “I don't ever want to leave this room”: Benefits of researching “with” children. ELT Journal, 68 (1), 6474.
Pinter A., & Zandian S. (2015). “I thought it would be tiny little one phrase that we said, in a huge big pile of papers”: Children's reflections on their involvement in participatory research. Qualitative Research, 15 (2), 235250.
Roberts H. (2008). Listening to children and hearing them. In Christensen P. & James A. (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (pp. 260275). London, UK: Routledge.
Sample E., & Michel M. (2014). An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy and fluency in young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 31, 2346.
Sato C. (1984). Phonological processes in second language acquisition: Another look at interlanguage syllable structure. Language Learning, 34 (4), 4357.
Schwartz B. D. (2004). Why child L2 acquisition? In Kampen J. van & Baauw S. (Eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2003 (pp. 4766). Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT [The Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics].
Shintani N. (2012). Repeating input-based tasks with young beginner learners. RELC Journal, 43 (1), 3951.
Skelton T. (2008). Research with children and young people: Exploring the tensions between ethics, competence and participation. Children's Geographies, 6 (1), 2136.
Snow C., & Hoefnagel-Höhle M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49, 11141128.
Stoller F. L. (2008). Content-based instruction. In Deusen-Scholl N. Van & Hornberger N. H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed.): Vol. 4. Second and foreign language education (pp. 5970). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science+Business Media.
Storch N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52 (1), 119158.
Swain M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass S. & Madden C. (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 235253). Rowley MA: Newbury House.
Swain M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In Doughty C. & Williams J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 6481). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Swain M., & Lapkin S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320337.
Swain M., & Lapkin S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4, 251274.
Tarone E., & Swain M. (1995). A sociolinguistic perspective on second language use in immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 166178.
Tedick D. J., & Young A. I. (2016). Fifth grade two-way immersion students’ responses to form-focused instruction. Applied Linguistics, 37 (6), 784807.
Thompson R., & Jackson S. (1998). Ethical dimensions of child memory research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 218224.
Tognini R., & Oliver R. (2012). L1 use in primary and secondary foreign language classrooms and its contribution to learning. In Alcón Soler E. & Jordá M. P. Safont (Eds.), Discourse and learning across L2 instructional contexts (pp. 5378). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.
Unsworth S. (2005). Child L1, child L2 and adult L2 acquisition: Differences and similarities. In Brugos A., Micciulla L., & Smith C. E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 633644). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
Unsworth S., de Bot K., Persson L., & Prins T. (2012, December 13). Foreign languages in primary school project. Proceedings of the foreign languages in primary schools projects: Presentation results FLiPP-research. Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Vygotsky L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
White L., Spada N., Lightbown P., & Ranta L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12 (4), 416423.
Wong-Fillmore L. (1976). The second time around: Cognitive and social strategies in second language acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Woodhead M., & Faulkner D. (2008). Subject, objects or participants? Dilemmas of psychological research with children. In Christensen P. & James A. (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practice (pp. 1039). New York, NY: Routledge.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0267-1905
  • EISSN: 1471-6356
  • URL: /core/journals/annual-review-of-applied-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 367 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1069 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 15th May 2017 - 25th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.