Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The future of archaeological theory

  • Julian Thomas (a1)
Abstract

In this latest contribution to our ‘Archaeological Futures’ series, Julian Thomas reflects on the current state of Western archaeological theory and how it is probably going to develop over the next few years. Archaeological theory has not ossified in the period since the processual/post-processual exchanges. The closer integration of archaeological thought with philosophical debate in the human sciences has gradually given rise to a theoretical landscape that would have been unrecognisable 30 years ago, wherein ‘new materialisms’ figure significantly.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alberti, B. 2013. Archaeology and ontologies of scale, in Alberti, B., Jones, A.M. & Pollard, J. (ed.) Archaeology after interpretation: 4358. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast.
Alberti, B., Fowles, S., Holbraad, M., Marshall, Y. & Witmore, C.L.. 2011. ‘Worlds otherwise’: archaeology, anthropology, and ontological difference. Current Anthropology 52: 896912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/662027
Barad, K. 2011. Nature's queer performativity. Qui Parle 19: 121–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5250/quiparle.19.2.0121
Barrett, J.C. 2014. The material constitution of humanness. Archaeological Dialogues 21: 6574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1380203814000105
Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant matter. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.
Berry, D.M. 2012. The uses of object-oriented ontology. Available at: http://stunlaw.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/uses-of-object-oriented-ontology.html (accessed 1 October 2015).
Bintliff, J.L. 2011. The death of archaeological theory?, in Bintliff, J.L. & Pearce, M. (ed.) The death of archaeological theory?: 722. Oxford: Oxbow.
Bogost, I. 2012. Alien phenomenology. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816678976.003.0001
Braver, L. 2007. A thing of this world: a history of continental anti-realism. Evanston: University of Illinois Press.
Braver, L. 2014. Heidegger. Cambridge: Polity.
Coole, D. & Frost, S.. 2010. Introducing the new materialisms, in Coole, D. & Frost, S. (ed.) New materialisms: 146. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.
DeLanda, M. 2006. A new philosophy of society. London: Continuum.
Domanska, E. 2006. The return to things. Archaeologia Polona 44: 171–85.
Fowler, C. 2013a. Dynamic assemblages, or the past is what endures, in Alberti, B., Jones, A.M. & Pollard, J. (ed.) Archaeology after interpretation: 235–56. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast.
Fowler, C. 2013b. The emergent past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fowler, C. & Harris, O.. 2015. Enduring relations: a paradox of new materialism. Journal of Material Culture 20: 127–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359183515577176
Gosden, C. 2005. What do objects want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12: 193211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10816-005-6928-x
Gratton, P. 2014. Speculative realism. London: Bloomsbury.
Harman, G. 2009. Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Melbourne: Re.press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0007
Harman, G. 2010. Towards speculative realism. Winchester: Zero Books.
Harman, G. 2014. Entanglement and relation. New Literary History 45: 3749.
Heidegger, M. 1971. The thing. Poetry, language, thought: 163–86. New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. 1977. The age of the world-picture. The question concerning technology and other essays: 115–54. New York: Harper & Row.
Henare, A., Holbraad, M. & Wastell, S.. 2007. Thinking through things, in Henare, A., Holbraad, M. & Wastell, S. (ed.) Thinking through things. London: Routledge.
Hodder, I. 1982. Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Symbolic and structural archaeology: 116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled. Oxford: John Wiley.
Ingold, T. 2012. Toward an ecology of materials. Annual Reviews of Anthropology 41: 427–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145920
Jones, A.M. 2012. Prehistoric materialities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199556427.001.0001
Jones, A.M. & Alberti, B.. 2013. Archaeology after interpretation, in Alberti, B., Jones, A.M. & Pollard, J. (ed.) Archaeology after interpretation: 1535. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lucas, G. 2012. Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meillassoux, Q. 2008. After finitude. London: Bloomsbury.
Miller, D. 1987. Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford: Blackwell.
Niemoczynski, L. 2013. 21st century speculative philosophy. Cosmos and History 9: 1331.
Olsen, B. 2012. After interpretation: remembering archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology 20: 1134.
Olsen, B., Shanks, M., Webmoor, T. & Witmore, C.. 2012. Archaeology: the discipline of things. Berkeley: University of California Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520274167.001.0001
Overton, N. & Hamilakis, Y.. 2013. A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Archaeological Dialogues 20: 111–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1380203813000159
Protevi, J. 2012. Deleuze and life, in Smith, D.W. & Somers-Hall, H. (ed.) The Cambridge companion to Deleuze: 239–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511753657.012
Rae, G. 2013. Heidegger's influence on post-humanism. History of the Human Sciences 26: 119.
Robb, J. 2013. Material culture, landscapes of action, and emergent causation. Current Anthropology 54: 657–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/673859
Shaviro, S. 2014. The universe of things. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816689248.001.0001
Sørenson, T.F. 2013. We have never been Latourian: archaeological ethics and the post-human condition. Norwegian Archaeological Review 46: 118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2013.779317
Thomas, J.S. 2015. What do we mean by ‘Neolithic societies’?, in Fowler, C., Harding, J. & Hofman, D. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of Neolithic Europe: 1073–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webmoor, T. 2007. What about ‘one more turn after the social’ in archaeological reasoning? Taking things seriously. World Archaeology 39: 563–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438240701679619
Witmore, C.L. 2007. Symmetrical archaeology: excerpts of a manifesto. World Archaeology 39: 546–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438240701679411
Wolfendale, P. 2014. Object-oriented philosophy. Falmouth: Urbanomic Media.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Antiquity
  • ISSN: 0003-598X
  • EISSN: 1745-1744
  • URL: /core/journals/antiquity
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 27
Total number of PDF views: 648 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1528 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.