Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Site of Troy

  • Winifred Lamb

The name of Troy, more touched with glamour than any other name in history, brings to the archaeologist, the literary critic and the ordinary man, associations so widely different that they are in danger of becoming altogether divorced. In the mind of the archaeologist, it calls up a series of unsolved problems that produce a faint sensation of irritation and anxiety. Can that tantalizing group of objects from Schliemann’s excavations, most of which have been arranged more according to style than to stratigraphy, be regarded as a safe guide to the development of prehistoric Asia Minor ? Which of the stone battle axes come from Town I and which from Town II ? What really happened between the second and the sixth settlement ? How does the material fit in with that from other early settlements in Asia Minor and adjacent lands ?

Hide All

1 I am concerned only with Europe in this essay. Having never been to America I can say nothing at first hand about the splendid museums there.

2 Paris, Société d’Édition ‘Les Belles Lettres’, 1930, pp.134.

3 Ludwig, Emil Schliemann of Troy; Putnam,, 1931, reviewed on p.108.

4 Publication of the material will appear in the Prähistorische Zdtschnyt for 1933.

5 Myres, J.R.A.I., 1903, p.369 ff.

6 Frankfort, , Studies in Ancient Pottery, 2, 57. ff.

7 J.H.S., XXXIV, p. 144.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0003-598X
  • EISSN: 1745-1744
  • URL: /core/journals/antiquity
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed