Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Why are there so few black American archaeologists?

  • Maria Franklin (a1)
Abstract

A Society for American Archaeology survey (1997) reports that its membership is overwhelmingly ‘European American’. Although it is no longer true that archaeology in the US is simply man's business rather than woman's, where are the practising archaeologists descended from historically marginalized groups so much of archaeology studies?

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bograd, M.D. & Singleton, T.A. 1997. The interpretation of slavery: Mount Vernon, Monticello, and Colonial Williamsburg, in Jameson, (ed.): 193204.
Bond, G.C. & Gilliam, A.(ed.). 1994. Social construction of the past: representation as power. London: Routledge.
Davis, K.L. 1997 Sites without sights: interpreting closed excavations, in Jameson, (ed.); 8498.
Epperson, T.W. 1997. The politics of ‘race’ and cultural identity at the African burial ground excavations, New York City, World Archaeological Bulletin (7): 10817.
Franklin, M. In press. ‘Power to the people’: sociopolitics and the archaeology of Black Americans, Historical Archaeology.
Honerkamp, N. & Zierden, M.A. 1997. The evolution of interpretation: the Charleston Place site, in Jameson, (ed.): 130–44.
Jameson, J.H. Jr., (ed.) 1997a. Presenting archaeology to the public: digging for truths. London: Alta Mira.
Jameson, J.H. Jr., 1997b. Introduction: what this book is all about, in Jameson, (ed.): 1120.
Leone, M.P. 1992. a multicultural African-American historical archaeology: how to place archaeology in the community in a state capital. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco (CA).
Leone, M.P., Parker, J. Potter, B. & Shackel, P.A. 1987. Toward a critical archaeology, Current Anthropology 28(3): 283302.
Mcdavid, C. 1996 Descendants, decisions and power: The public interpretation of the archaeology of the Levi Jordan plantation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Historical Archaeology Conference on Historical andUnderwater Archaeology, Cincinnati (OH).
Mckee, L. 1994. is it futile to try and be useful?: historical archaeology and the African-American experience. Northeast Historical Archaeology 23: 17.
Pinsky, V. & Wylie, A. (ed.),. 1989. Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Potter, P. 1994. Public archaeology in Annapolis: a critical approach to history in Maryland’s ancient city. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.
Schmidt, P.R. & Patterson, T.C. (ed.). 1995. Making alternative histories: the practice of archaeology and history in non-western settings. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.
Stone, P.G. 1997. Presenting the past: a framework for discussion, in Jameson, (ed.): 2334.
Wylie, A. 1983. Comments on the sociopolitics of archaeology: the de-mystification of the profession, in Gero, J.M. Lacy, D.M. & Blakey, M.L. (ed.), The sociopolitics of archaeology: 119–30. Amherst (MA): University of Massachusetts.
Wylie, A. 1985. Putting Shakertown back together: critical theory in archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4: 133–47.
Zeder, M.A. 1997 The American archaeologist: results of the 1994 SAA census, Society for American Archaeology Bulletin 15(2): 1217.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Antiquity
  • ISSN: 0003-598X
  • EISSN: 1745-1744
  • URL: /core/journals/antiquity
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 9 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 238 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.