Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

A linguistic module for integrating the senses, or a house of cards?

  • Rick Dale (a1) and Michael Spivey (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02300128
  • Published online: 01 December 2002
Abstract

Carruthers invokes a number of controversial assumptions to support his thesis. Most are questionable and unnecessary to investigate the wider relevance of language in cognition. A number of research programs (e.g., interactionist psycholinguistics and cognitive linguistics) have for years pursued a similar thesis and provide a more empirically grounded framework for investigating language’ cognitive functions.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×