Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Growing cognition from recycled parts

  • Robert Leech (a1), Denis Mareschal (a1) and Richard P. Cooper (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08004718
  • Published online: 01 July 2008
Abstract
Abstract

In this response, we reiterate the importance of development (both ontogenetic and phylogenetic) in the understanding of a complex cognitive skill – analogical reasoning. Four key questions structure the response: Does relational priming exist, and is it sufficient for analogy? What do we mean by relations as transformations? Could all or any relations be represented as transformations? And what about the challenge of more complex analogies? In addressing these questions we bring together a number of supportive commentaries, strengthening our emergentist case for analogy (in particular with insights from comparative psychology), and review new supportive evidence. We also rebut those commentaries that ignore development at their peril. Along the way, we revisit the main assumptions underlying the analogy as relational priming (ARP) account of analogy, clarifying and elaborating as necessary.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

L. J. Chapman , J. P. Chapman , T. E. Curran & M. B. Miller (1994) Do children and the elderly show heightened semantic priming? Developmental Review 14:159–85.

A. Cheshire , K. Muldoon , B. Francis , C. N. Lewis & L. J. Ball (2007) Modelling change: New opportunities in the analysis of microgenetic data. Infant and Child Development 16:119–34.

L. A. A. Doumas , J. E. Hummel & C. M. Sandhofer (2008) A theory of the discovery and prediction of relational concepts. Psychological Review 115:143.

R. M. French (2002) The computational modeling of analogy-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6:200205.

U. Goswami & A. L. Brown (1990) Higher-order structure and relational reasoning: Contrasting analogical and thematic relations. Cognition 36:207–26.

U. Hahn , N. Chater & L. B. C. Richardson (2003) Similarity as transformation. Cognition 87:132.

D. Marr (1982) Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W. H. Freeman.

M. J. Rattermann & D. Gentner (1998a) More evidence for a relational shift in the development of analogy: Children's performance on a causal-mapping task. Cognitive Development 13:453–78.

B. A. Spellman , K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (2001) Analogical priming via semantic relations. Memory and Cognition 29:383–93.

R. J. Sternberg (1977a) Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review 84:353–78.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

This erratum applies to the following article(s)