Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 129
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Atari, Mohammad and Jamali, Ramin 2016. Mate Preferences in Young Iranian Women: Cultural and Individual Difference Correlates. Evolutionary Psychological Science,

    Brandon, Marianne 2016. Monogamy and Nonmonogamy: Evolutionary Considerations and Treatment Challenges. Sexual Medicine Reviews,

    Chen, Rui Zheng, Yuhuang and Zhang, Yan 2016. Fickle men, faithful women: Effects of mating cues on men's and women's variety-seeking behavior in consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 275.

    Dunbar, R. I. M. and Wlodarski, Rafael 2016. Reply to Falcon. Biology Letters, Vol. 12, Issue. 5, p. 20160213.

    Fisher, Claire I. Hahn, Amanda C. DeBruine, Lisa M. and Jones, Benedict C. 2016. Is women's sociosexual orientation related to their physical attractiveness?. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 101, p. 396.

    Frederick, David Lynn, Justin and Ronne, Brandon 2016. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies.

    Howard, Rhea M. and Perilloux, Carin 2016. Is mating psychology most closely tied to biological sex or preferred partner's sex?. Personality and Individual Differences,

    Jozkowski, Kristen N. Sanders, Stephanie A. Rhoads, Kelley Milhausen, Robin R. and Graham, Cynthia A. 2016. Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women (SESII-W) in a Sample of Lesbian and Bisexual Women. The Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 53, Issue. 7, p. 836.

    Kenyon, Chris R. Tsoumanis, Achilleas and Schwartz, Ilan Steven 2016. A population's higher-risk sexual behaviour is associated with its average sexual behaviour—An ecological analysis of subpopulations in Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, Uganda and the United States. Epidemics, Vol. 15, p. 56.

    Lucchi Basili, Lorenza and Sacco, Pier 2016. Tie-Up Cycles in Long-Term Mating. Part I: Theory. Challenges, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 12.

    Minkov, Michael and Beaver, Kevin 2016. A test of life history strategy theory as a predictor of criminal violence across 51 nations. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 97, p. 186.

    Moors, Amy C. 2016. Has the American Public’s Interest in Information Related to Relationships Beyond “The Couple” Increased Over Time?. The Journal of Sex Research, p. 1.

    Persson, Tonje J. Ryder, Andrew G. and Pfaus, James G. 2016. Comparing Subjective Ratings of Sexual Arousal and Desire in Partnered Sexual Activities from Women of Different Sexual Orientations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 45, Issue. 6, p. 1391.

    Puts, David 2016. Human sexual selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 7, p. 28.

    Rodrigues, David and Lopes, Diniz 2016. Sociosexuality, Commitment, and Sexual Desire for an Attractive Person. Archives of Sexual Behavior,

    Rodrigues, David Lopes, Diniz and Pereira, Marco 2016. Sociosexuality, Commitment, Sexual Infidelity, and Perceptions of Infidelity: Data From the Second Love Web Site. The Journal of Sex Research, p. 1.

    Schmitt, David P. Long, Audrey E. McPhearson, Allante O'Brien, Kirby Remmert, Brooke and Shah, Seema H. 2016. Personality and gender differences in global perspective. International Journal of Psychology, p. n/a.

    2016. Adult Attachment.

    Bleske-Rechek, April and Ryan, Danielle E. 2015. Continuity and change in emerging adults’ mate preferences and mating orientations. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 72, p. 90.

    Conley, Terri D. Matsick, Jes L. Moors, Amy C. Ziegler, Ali and Rubin, Jennifer D. 2015. Re-examining the effectiveness of monogamy as an STI-preventive strategy. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 78, p. 23.


Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating

  • David P. Schmitt (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2005

The Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI; Simpson & Gangestad 1991) is a self-report measure of individual differences in human mating strategies. Low SOI scores signify that a person is sociosexually restricted, or follows a more monogamous mating strategy. High SOI scores indicate that an individual is unrestricted, or has a more promiscuous mating strategy. As part of the International Sexuality Description Project (ISDP), the SOI was translated from English into 25 additional languages and administered to a total sample of 14,059 people across 48 nations. Responses to the SOI were used to address four main issues. First, the psychometric properties of the SOI were examined in cross-cultural perspective. The SOI possessed adequate reliability and validity both within and across a diverse range of modern cultures. Second, theories concerning the systematic distribution of sociosexuality across cultures were evaluated. Both operational sex ratios and reproductively demanding environments related in evolutionary-predicted ways to national levels of sociosexuality. Third, sex differences in sociosexuality were generally large and demonstrated cross-cultural universality across the 48 nations of the ISDP, confirming several evolutionary theories of human mating. Fourth, sex differences in sociosexuality were significantly larger when reproductive environments were demanding but were reduced to more moderate levels in cultures with more political and economic gender equality. Implications for evolutionary and social role theories of human sexuality are discussed.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *