Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T11:18:23.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tag, you're it: Affect tagging promotes goal formation and selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Eliza Bliss-Moreau
Affiliation:
Brain, Mind, and Behavior Unit, California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616. eblissmoreau@ucdavis.eduhttp://www.elizablissmoreau.com
Lisa A. Williams
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. lwilliams@unsw.edu.auhttp://www.williamssocialemotionslab.com

Abstract

Building upon Huang & Bargh's (H&B's) theory, we propose a complementary view that goal formation and selection are both supported by affect. We suggest that goals may form when affect “tags” discrete behaviors and their outcomes. Further, we propose that goal-associated affect may help guide selection between competing goals, for example, in the case of short-term and long-term goals.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, H. (2007) On the emergence of human goal pursuit: The nonconscious regulation and motivation of goals. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 1(1):183201.Google Scholar
Anderson, E., Siegel, E. H. & Barrett, L. F. (2011a) What you feel influences what you see: The role of affective feelings in resolving binocular rivalry. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47(4):856–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, E., Siegel, E. H., Bliss-Moreau, E. & Barrett, L. F. (2011b) The visual impact of gossip. Science 332(6036):1446–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagozzi, R. P. & Pieters, R. (1998) Goal-directed emotions. Cognition & Emotion 12(1):126.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2006) Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion, Personality and Social Psychology Review 10(1):2046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, L. F. & Bliss-Moreau, E. (2009) Affect as a psychological primitive. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 41:167218.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. & Russell, J. A. (1999) The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8(1):1014.Google Scholar
Bliss-Moreau, E. & Barrett, L. F. (2009) What's reason got to do with it? Affect as the foundation of learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(2):201202.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1990) Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review 97(1):1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2000) Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In: Handbook of emotions, 2nd edition, ed. Lewis, M. & Haviland-Jones, J. M.. pp. 91115. Guilford.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H. (1986) The emotions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gable, P. & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010) The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation. Cognition & Emotion 24(2):322–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckhausen, H. & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987) Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion 11(2):101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1997) Beyond pleasure and pain. The American Psychologist 52(12):1280–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keltner, D. & Gross, J. J. (1999) Functional accounts of emotions. Cognition & Emotion 13(5):467–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, D. M. & Hamilton, D. L. (1993) Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W. & Wyer, R. S. (1993) Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64:317–26.Google Scholar
Moreno, K. N. & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2001) Intergroup affect and social judgment: Feelings as inadmissible information. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 4(1):2129.Google Scholar
Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O. & Stewart, B. D. (2005) An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89(3):277–93.Google Scholar
Payne, B. K., McClernon, F. J. & Dobbins, I. G. (2007) Automatic affective responses to smoking cues. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 15(4):400409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raghunathan, R. & Pham, M. T. (1999) All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79:5677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revelle, W. (1995) Personality processes. Annual Review of Psychology 46(1):295328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. A. (2003) Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review 110(1):145–72.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. & Bohner, G. (1996) Feelings and their motivational implications: Moods and the action sequence. In: The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior, ed. Gollwitzer, P. M. & Bargh, J. A., pp. 119–45. Guilford.Google Scholar
Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E. & Smith, S. M. (1995) Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, L. A. & DeSteno, D. (2014) Building bonds, attaining ambitions, and establishing esteem: How positive emotions serve intrapersonal needs. In: The light and dark sides of positive emotion, ed. Gruber, J. & Moskowitz, J., pp. 206–24. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yik, M. S. M. & Russell, J. A. (2001) Predicting the big two of affect from the Big Five of personality. Journal of Research in Personality 35(3):247–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar