Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability

  • David Lightfoot (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

According to a “selective” (as opposed to “instructive”) model of human language capacity, people come to know more than they experience. The discrepancy between experience and eventual capacity (the “poverty of the stimulus”) is bridged by genetically provided information. Hence any hypothesis about the linguistic genotype (or “Universal Grammar,” UG) has consequences for what experience is needed and what form people's mature capacities (or “grammars”) will take. This BBS target article discusses the “trigger experience,” that is, the experience that actually affects a child's linguistic development. It is argued that this must be a subset of a child's total linguistic experience and hence that much of what a child hears has no consequence for the form of the eventual grammar. UG filters experience and provides an upper bound on what constitutes the triggering experience. This filtering effect can often be seen in the way linguistic capacity can change between generations. Children only need access to robust structures of minimal (“degree-0”) complexity. Everything can be learned from simple, unembedded “domains” (a grammatical concept involved in defining an expression's logical form). Children do not need access to more complex structures.

Copyright
References
Hide All
N Abe. (1988) Polynomial learnability and locality of formal grammars Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). Buffalo, NY, 06. [AKJ]
Adams M. (1984) Multiple interrogation in Italian Linguistic Review 4 128. [aDL]
Adams M. (1987) From Old French to the theory of pro-drop Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5. 132. [RF]
Allen C. (1986) Reconsidering the history of like. Journal of Linguistics 22: 375409. [aDL, NV]
Anderson A. R. & Belnap N. D Jr, (1975) Entailment, vol I Princeton University Press. [JDM]
Anderson J.M (1986) A note on Old English impersonals. Journal of Linguistics 22: 167–77. [aDL]
Anderson S. (1982) Types of dependency in anaphors Manuscript, University of California at Los Angeles. [EW]
Anderson S. R. (1986) The typology of anaphoric dependencies. Icelandic (and other) reflexives In: Topics in Scandinavian syntax, ed Hellan L. & Reidel K. Koch Christensen. [HH, LR]
A-B Andersson. & Dahl O. (1974) Against the penthouse principle. Linguistic Inquiry 5:451–54. [TW]
Aoun J. (1986) Generalized binding. Foris. [arDL]
Aoun .J & Lightfoot D. W. (1984) Government and contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 15 465–73 [rDL]
Baker C L. (1978) Introduction to generative-transformational syntax. Prentice-Hall. [arDL]
Baker C L. (1979) Syntactic theory and the projection problem Linguistic Inquiry 10: 533–81. [aDL]
Baker C L. (1982) Review article on Wexler & Cuhcover (1980) Language 58. 413–21. [aDL]
Baker C. L. & McCarthy J.J. (1981) The logical problem of language acquisition. MIT Press. [JG]
Berwick R. C. (1985) The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. MIT Press [aDL, RC, LR]
Bickerton D. (1984) The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173221. [arDL]
Bloom L. (1970) Language development Form and function in emerging grammars. MIT Press. [ADG]
Bohannon J. N. & Stanowicz L. (1988) The issue of negative evidence Adult responses to children's language errors Developmental Psychology 24.684–89. [JG. CES]
Borer H. & Wexler K. (1987) The maturation of syntax. In: Parameter setting, ed Roeper T. & Williams E.. Reidel. [rDL GC]
Bowerman M. (1982) Reorganization processes in lexical and syntactic development. In. Language acquisition: The state of the art, ed. Wanner E. & Gleitman L.. Cambridge University Press. [CES]
Bowerman M. (1985) What shapes children's grammars. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition Vol. 2: Theoretical issues, ed. Slobin D. I.. Erlbaum. [ADG]
Braine M D. S. (1971) On two types of models of th e intemalization of grammars. In: The ontogenesis of grammar: A theoretical symposium, ed. Slobin D. I.. Academic Press. [IMS]
Braine M D. S. (1988) Modeling the acquisition of linguistic structure. In: Categories and processes in language acquisition theory, ed Levy Y., Schlesinger I. M & Braine M. D. S.. Erlbaum. [IMS]
Brandon R. & Hornstein N. (1986) From icons to symbols: Some speculations on the origin of language. Biology and Philosophy 1 (2): 169–89. [rDL]
Bresnan J. (1971) Contraction and the transformational cycle. Indiana University Linguistics Club. [HL]
Brown R. (1973) A first language: The early stages. Harvard University Press. [rDL, ADG, JLM]
Brown R. (1977) Introduction. Talking to children. Language input and acquisition, ed. Snow C. E. & Ferguson C. A.. Cambridge University Press. [ADG]
Brown R. & Hanlon C. (1970) Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In Cognition and the development of language, ed. Hayes J. R.. Wiley. [JG]
Burzio L. (1981) Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Reidel. [rDL]
Canale M. (1978) Word order change in Old English: Base reanalysis in generative grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University. [aDL]
Changeux J.P (1980) Genetic determinism and epigenesis of the neuronal network: Is there a biological compromise between Chomsky and Piaget? In: Language and learning, ed. Piatelli-Palamarini M.. Routledge & Kegan Paul. [aDL]
Changeux J.P (1983) L'homme neuronal Fayard. [aDL]
Chien Y -C & Wexler K. (1987) A comparison between Chinese-speaking and English-speaking children's acquisition of reflexives and pronouns. Paper presented at the 12th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. [rDL]
Chomsky N. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax MIT Press. [arDL, IMS, EPS]
Chomsky N. (1970) Remarks on nominalization. In: Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. Jacobs R. & Rosenbaum P. R.. Ginn. (Page references to reprint in Chomsky 1972b.) [JDM]
Chomsky N. (1972) Language and mind, enlarged edition. Brace Harcourt & Jovanovich [rDL]
Chomsky N. (1972a) Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. In. Goals of linguistic theory, ed. Peters S.. Prentice-Hall. (Page references to reprint in Chomsky 1972b.) [JDM]
Chomsky N.(1972b) Studies on semantics in generative grammar. Mouton. [JDM]
Chomsky N. (1973) Conditions on transformations. In. A festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. Anderson S. & Kiparsky P.. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [aDL]
Chomsky N. (1975) Reflections on language. Pantheon. [GC, WW]
Chomsky N. (1980) Rules and representations Columbia University Press. [EPS]
Chomsky N. (1981a) Lectures on government and binding. Foris. [aDL, RC, HH, HL, EPS]
Chomsky N. (1981b) Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In: Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition, ed Hornstein N. & Lightfoot D.. Longman. [RF]
Chomsky N. (1986a) Barriers MIT Press [LR, EPS]
Chomsky N. (1986b) Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Praeger. [JLM]
Chomsky N. (1988) Language and problems of knowledge. MIT Press. [JLM]
Chung S. & McCloskey J. (1987) Government, barriers, and small clauses in modern Irish. Linguistic Inquiry 18:173237. [rDL, RC]
Cinque G (1981) On Keenan and Comrie's primary relativization constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 12(2).293308. [rDL]
Clark R. (1977) What's the use of imitation? Journal of Child Language 4: 341–49. [CES]
Clark R. (1978) Some even simpler ways to learn to talk. In: The development of communication, ed. Waterson N. & Snow C.. Wiley. [CES]
Clements G. N. (1975) The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 2: 141–77. [TW]
Creider C. (1987) Structural and pragmatic factors influencing the acceptability of sentences with extended dependencies in Norwegian. Working papers in Linguistics 4. University of Trondheim [EPS]
Culicover P. W. & Wilkins W. K. (1984) Locality in linguistic theory. Academic Press. [arDL, WW]
Demetras M. J., Post K. N. & Snow C. E. (1986) Feedback to first language learners: The role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language 13: 275–92. [JG]
Dresher B. E. & Kaye J. (forthcoming) A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition. [rDL]
Ellegård A. (1953) The auxiliary “do”: The establishment and regulation of Us use in English. Almqvist and Wiksell. [AK]
Elmer W. (1981) Diachronic grammar: The history of Old and Middle English subjectless constructions. Niemeyer. [aDL]
Emonds J. (1976) A transformational approach to English syntax. Academic Press. [WW]
Epstein S. D. (1982) Clitic rules and learnability. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut. [HL]
Ervin-Tripp S. & Mitchell-Keman C. (1977a) Introduction. Child discourse, ed. Ervin-Tripp S. & Mitchell-Keman C.. Academic. [ADG]
Ervin-Tripp S. & Mitchell-Keman C.eds. (1977b) Child discourse. Academic. [ADG]
Felix S. (1987) Cognition and language growth. Foris. [GC]
Fillmore L. W. (1979) Individual differences in second language acquisition. Individual differences in language ability and language behavior, ed. Fillmore C. J., Kempler D. & Wong W. S-Y.. Academic. [ADG]
Fisher O. & van der Leek F. (1983) The demise of th e Old English impersonal construction. Journal of Linguistics 19: 337–68. [aDL]
Fontaine C. (1985) Application de methodes quantitatives en diachronie: L'inversion du sujet en français. Thèse de Maîtrise. Université du Quebec à Montréal. [AK]
Geach P. (1962) Reference and generality. Cornell University Press. [SN]
Gold E. M. (1967) Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10: 447–74. [JG, JLM]
Greenberg J. H. (1966) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In: Universals of language, ed. Greenberg J. H.. MIT Press. [aDL]
Griffin D. R. (1984) Animal thinking. Harvard University Press. [JDM]
Grimshaw A. D. (1987) Disambiguating discourse: Member's skill and analyst's problem. Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 186204. [ADG]
Grimshaw J. (1981) Form, (unction, and the language acquisition device. In: The logical problem of language acquisition, ed. Baker C. L. & McCarthy J. J.. MIT Press. [JG]
Grimshaw J. (1986) Subjacency and the S/S' parameter. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 364–69. [arDL, HWB, LR]
Grimshaw J. (1987) The components of learnabilit y theory. In: Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding, ed. Garfield J. L.. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [EPS]
Gruber J. (1967) Topicalization in child language. Foundations of Language 3: 3765. [GC]
Gueron J. (1981) Logical operators, complete constituents, and extraction transformations. In: Levels of syntactic representation, ed.May R. & Koster J. Foris. [EPS]
Gumperz J. J. & Hernandez-Ch. E. (1972) Bilingualism, bidialectalism, and classroom interaction. In: Functions of language in the classroom, ed. Cazden C B., John V. P. & Hymes D.. Teachers College Press. [ADG]
Halliday M. A. K. (1975) Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. Edward Arnold. [ADG]
Hasher L. & Zacks R. T. (1984) Automatic processing of fundamental information. American Psychologist 39: 1372–88. [IMS]
Hawkins J. A. (1979) Implicational universals as predicators of word order change. Language 55: 618–48. [aDL]
Hirsh-Pasek K., Treiman R. & Schneiderman M (1984) Brown and Hanlon revisited: Mothers' sensitivity to ungrammatical forms. Journal of Child Language 11: 8188. [JG]
Hopper P. & Traugott E. C. (forthcoming) Crammaticahzation. Cambridge University Press. [NV]
Horgan D. (1978) The development of the full passive. Journal of Child Language 5: 6580. [CES]
Hornstein N. & Lightfoot D. W. (1987) Predication and PRO. Language 63: 2352. [aDL]
Hornstein N. & Lightfoot D. W. (1981) Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition. Longman. [aDL, RH]
Hornstein N. & Weinberg A. S. (1981) Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 5591. [aDL]
Huang J. (1982) Logical relations in Chinese and th e theory ol grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT. [aDL]
Hubel S. H. & Wiesel T. N. (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 160: 106–54. [aDL]
Huttenlocher J. (1974) The onset of language comprehension. In. Theories in cognitive psychology, ed. Solso R.. Erlbaum. [CES]
Hyams N. (1983) The Pro-drop parameter in child grammars. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford. [arDL]
Hyams N. (1986) Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Reidel. [GC]
Hyams N. (1987) The setting of the null subject parameter. A reanalysis. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Child Language Development, 10. [JLM]
Hyman L. & Comrie B. (1981) Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 1937. [rDL, TW]
Jenkins L. (1979) The genetics of language. Linguistics and Philosophy 3: 105–19. [rDL]
Jeme N. K. (1967) Antibodies and learning: Selection versus instruction. In: The neurosciences: A study program, ed. Quarton G. C., Melnechuk T. & Schmitt F. O.. Rockefeller University. [aDL]
Jeme N. K. (1985) The generative grammar of the immune system. Science 229. 1057–59. [aDL]
Jespersen O. (1922) Language: Its nature, development, and origin. Allen & Unwin. [aDL, JDM]
Joshi A. K. (1985) How much context sensitivity is needed for reasonable structural descriptions: Tree adjoining grammars. In: Natural language parsing: Psycholinguistic, computational, and theoretical perspectives, ed. Dowty D., Karttunen L. & Zwicky A.. Cambridge University Press. [AKJ]
Joshi A. K. (1987) An introduction to tree adjoining grammars. In: Mathematics of language, ed. Manaster-Rammer A.. John Benjamins. [AKJ]
Joshi A. K., Vijay Shanker K. & Weir D. (in press) Convergence of mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms. In. Natural language parsing, ed. Sells P. & Wasow T.. MIT Press. [AKJ]
Kaplan R. & Bresnan J. (1982) Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In: The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. Bresnan J.. MIT Press. [WO]
Kayne R. S. (1975) French syntax: The transformational cycle. MIT Press. [EPS]
Kayne R. S. (1981) ECP extensions. Linguistic Inquiry 12(1): 93133. Reprinted in R. S.Kayne (1983), Connectedness and binary branching. Foris. [aDL, EPS]
Keenan E. & Comrie B. (1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63100. [rDL, TW]
Klima E. & Bellugi U. (1966) Syntactic regularities in the speech of children In. Psycholinguistic papers, ed. Lyons J. & Wales R.Edinburgh University Press. [aDL]
Koch Christensen K. (1982) On multiple filler-gap constructions in Norwegian. In. Readings on unbounded dependencies in Scandinavian languages, ed Engdahl E. & Ejerhed E.. Almqvist & Wiksell. [HH]
Koopman H. (1983) ECP effects in main clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 346–50 [aDL]
Koster J. (1984) On binding and control. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 417–59. [EW]
Koster J. (1986) Domain and Dynasties The radical autonomy of syntax. Foris [EPS]
Kroch A. S. (1987) Unbounded dependency and subjacency in a tree adjoining grammar In: Mathematics of language, ed. Manaster-Ramer A.. John Benjamins. [AKJ]
Kroch A. S. (1989) Function and grammar in the history of English periphrastic “do.” In Language variation and change, ed. Fasold R. & Schiffrin D.. John Benjamins. [AK]
Kroch A S. & Joshi A. K. (in press) Linguistic relevance of tree adjoining grammars. In. Linguistics and philosophy. (Originallv appeared as Technical Report MS-CIS-85-18. Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 1985.) [AKJ]
Kroch A., Myhill J. & Pintzuk S. (1982) Understanding “do.” Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. [AK]
Labov W. (1972a) Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press. [AK]
Labov W. (1972b) The internal evolution of linguistic rules. In: Linguistic change and generative theory, ed. Stockwell R. P. & Macaulay R. K. S.. Indiana University Press [ADG]
Labov W. (1980) Locating language m time and space. Academic Press [AK]
Labov W. (1986) Language structure and social structure. In: Approaches to social theory, ed. Lindenberg S., Coleman J. S. & Nowak S.. Russell Sage Foundation. [ADG]
Larson R K. (1988) On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–91 [YG]
Lasnik H. (1981) Restricting the theory of transformations. A case study. In: Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition, ed. Hornstein N. & Lightfoot D. W.. Longman.
Lasnik H. [aDL] (in press) On certain substitutes for negative data. In: Essays on restrictiveness and learnability, ed. Lasnik H.. Reidel [HL]
Lebeaux D. S. (1987) Comments on Hyams. In. Parameter setting, ed. Roeper T. & Williams E.. Reidel. [GC]
Lebeaux D. S. (1988) Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst [rDL]
Lee H. & Wexler K (1987) The acquisition of reflexives and pronouns in Korean. From a cross-linguistic perspective Paper presented at the 12th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. [rDL]
Levine D. N. (1985) The flight from ambiguity. Essays in social and cultural theory. Universit y of Chicago Press [ADG]
Lightfoot D. W. (1979) Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge University Press. [aDL, NV]
Lightfoot D. W. (1982) The language lottery. Toward a biology of grammars. MIT Press. [arDL, WO]
Lightfoot D. W. (1986) Review of Culicover & Wilkins (1984). Journal of Linguistics 22: 480–85. [aDL]
Lightfoot D. W. (1988) Creoles, triggers, and Universal Grammar. In: A festschift for R. P. Stockwell, ed. Duncan-Rose C. et al. Croom Helm. [aDL]
Lightfoot D. W. (in press) Obsolescence and Universal Grammar. In: Proceedings of the fifth meeting of the International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Benjamins. [rDL]
Lightfoot D. W. (forthcoming) New parameter settings. [arDL ]
Ludlow P. & Neale S. (1988) Indefinite descriptions. In defence of Russell, manuscript, Princeton University [SN]
MacWhinney B. & Snow C. E. (1985) The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language 12: 271–96. [JLM]
Maling J. (1986) Clause-bounded reflexives in modem Icelandic. In: Topics in Scandinavian syntax, ed. Hellan L. & Chnstensen K. Koch. Reidel. [HH]
Manzini M.-R. & Wexler K. (1987) Parameters, bindig theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 413–44. [RC, LR]
Maratsos M. (1974) How preschool children understand missing complement sentences. Child Development 45. 700706. [CES ]
Martinet A. (1955) Economic des changements phonitiques. Francke. [NV]
Matthei E. (1981) Children's interpretation of sentences containing reciprocals. In: Language acquisition and linguistic theory, ed. Tavakolian S. L.. MIT Press. [aDL]
Mazurkewich I. & White L. (1984) The acquisition of the dative alternation: Unlearning overgeneralizations. Cognition 16.261–83. [aDL]
McCarthy J. & Hayes P. (1969) Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In. Machine learning 4, ed. Meltzer B. & Michie D.. Edinburgh University Press [RC]
McCawley J. D. (1979) Language universals in linguistic argumentation. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 8(2):205–19. (Reprinted in McCawley 1982b.) [JDM]
McCawley J. D. (1982a) The nonexistence of syntactic categories. In. Thirty million theories of grammar. University of Chicago Press. [JDM]
McCawley J. D. (1982b) Thirty million theories of grammar. University of Chicago Press. [JDM]
McCawley J. D. (1983) Towards plausibility in theories of language acquisition Communication and Cognition 16:169–83. [JDM]
McCawley J. D. (1985) Review of F. Heny and B Richards, Linguistic categories. Language 61:668–79. [JDM]
McCawley J. D. (1988) The syntactic phenomena of English University of Chicago Press. [JDM]
McNeill D. (1966) Developmental linguistics. In The genesis of language: A psycholinguistic approach, ed Smith F. & Miller G. A.MIT Press [aDL, CES]
Mehler J. (1974) Connaître par desapprentissage. In: L'unité de l'homme, ed. Morin E. & Piatelli-Pamarini M.. Editions du Seuil. [aDL]
Morgan J L. (1986) From simple input to complex grammars. MIT Press. [aDL, JLM, EPS]
Nelson K. E. (1982) Theories of the child's acquisition of syntax. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 345:4569. [CES]
Nelson K. E. (1987) Reflections on a rare-event cognitive comparison theory of language acquisition. In: Children's language, vol. 6, ed. Nelson K. E. & van Kleeck A.. Erlbaum. [CES]
Newport E. C. (1977) Motherese The speech of mothers to young children. In: Cognitive theory, vol. 2, ed. Castellan N, Pisoni D, & Potts G.. Erlbaum. [EPS]
Newport E. C., Gleitman H. & Gleitman L. (1977) “Mother, I'd rather do it myself”: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In: Talking to children. Language input and acquisition, ed Snow C. E. & Ferguson C. A.. Cambridge University Press [aDL, RC]
Noble S (1985) To have and have got. Paper delivered at the New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English (NWAVE) XIV Conference at Georgetown University. [AK]
Obenauer H.-G. (1984) On the identification of empty categories. Linguistic Review 4:153202. [EPS]
Ochs E. (1986) Introduction. Language socialization across cultures, ed. Schieffelin B. B. & Ochs E.. Cambridge University Press [ADG]
O'Grady W. (1987) Principles of grammar and learning. University of Chicago Press. [WO]
O'Grady W. (forthcoming) Categories and case: The sentence structure of Korean. [WO]
Oliveira e Silva G. (1982) Estudo da Regularidade na Variação dos Possessivos no Português do Rio de Janeiro. Tese du Doutorado em Letras. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. [AK]
Osherson D., Stob M. & Weinstein S. (1986) Systems that learn. MIT Press. [JLM]
Osherson D. & Wasow T. (1976) Task-specificity and species-specificity in the study of language. Cognition 4:203–14. [WO]
Penner S. (1987) Parental responses to grammatical and ungrammatical child utterances. Child Development 58.376–84 [JG]
Pesetzky D. (1982) Paths and categories. Unpublished dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [HH]
Phinney M. (1987) The pro-drop parameter in second language acquisition. In: Parameter setting, ed. Roeper T. & Williams E.. Reidel [HWB]
Piattelli-Palmanni M. (1986) The rise of selective theories A case study and some lessons from immunology. In. Language learning and concept acquisition, ed. Demopoulos W & Marras A.. Ablex [aDL]
Pica P. (1987) On the nature of the reflexivisation cycle. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, 17. [rDL, LR]
Pinker S. (1979) Formal models of language learning. Cognition 7:217–83. [JG]
Pinker S. (1984) Language learnability and language development. Harvard University Press. [JG, HH, CES]
Pinker S. (1988) Resolving a learnability paradox in the acquisition of the verb lexicon. In. Lexicon project working papers 17. Center for Cognitive Science, MIT. [YG]
Pinker S. (1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure MIT Press. [JG]
Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G. & Svartvik J. (1972) A grammar of contemporary English. Longman. [IMS]
Radford A (1988) Small children's small clauses. Transactions of the Philological Society 86.143. [rDL. GC]
Randall J. (1985) Retreat routes. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development. 10. [arDL. YG]
Reinhart T. (1975) A note on the two-comp hypothesis. Unpublished paper. Massachusetts Institute of Technology [JK]
Rizzi L. (1982a) Issues in Italian syntax Fons larDL. RF. LR]
Rizzi L. (1982b) Comments on Chomsky's “On the representation of form and function.” In. Perspectives on mental representation, ed Mehler J, Walker E. C. T & Garrett M.Erlbaum. [aDL. GC. RH]
Rizzi L. (1986) Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17:501–57. [GC, LR]
Roberts I (1985) Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3.2158. [AK]
Roeper T. (1979) Children's syntax. Mimeo, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [aDL]
T Roeper & Williams E., eds. (1987) Parameter setting. Reidel. [EW]
Romaine S. (1985) Why the problem of language acquisition should not be explained logically Studies in Language 9(2):255–70. [RH]
Ross J. R. (1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [WW]
Ross J. R. (1973) The penthouse principle and the order of constituents. In: You take the high node and I'll take the low node: Papers from the Comparative Syntax Festival, ed. Corum C, Smith-Stark T. C. & Weiser A.Chicago Linguistics Society. [aDL]
Rouveret A. & Vergnaud J.-R. (1980) Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representations. Linguistic Inquiry. 11 97202 [aDL]
Russell B. (1919) Introduction to mathematical philosophy. Allen & Unwin. [SN]
Sachs J. & Truswell L. (1978) Comprehension of two-word instructions by children in the one-word stage. Journal of Child Language 5:1723. [CES]
Safir K J. (1985) Syntactic chains. Cambridge University Press. [EPS]
Sainsbury R. (1971) The “Feature Positive Effect” and simultaneous discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 11:347–56. [aDL]
Sainsbury R. (1973) Discrimination learning utilizing positive or negative cues. Canadian Journal of Psychology 27 4657. [aDL]
Sankoff G. (1980) The social life of language University of Pennsylvania Press. [ADG]
Schauber E (1979) The syntax and semantics of questions in Navajo. Garland. [WW]
Schieffelin B. B. & Ochs E, eds. (1986) Language socialization across cultures Cambridge University Press. [ADG]
Schlesinger I. M. (1977) Production and comprehension of utterances. Erlbaum. [IMS]
Schlesinger I. M. (1982) Steps to language: Toward a theory of language acquisition. Erlbaum. [IMS]
Schlesinger I. M. (1985) Instruments as agents. Working Paper No. 15, The Goldie Rotman Center for Cognitive Science in Education. Hebrew University, Jerusalem. [IMS]
Schlesinger I. M. (1988) The origin of relational categories. In: Categories and processes in language acquisition theory, ed. Levy Y., Schlesinger I M. & Braine M. D. S.. Erlbaum. [IMS]
Sells P. (1987) Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18:445–79. [rDL, TW]
Sigurjonsdottir S. & Hyams N (1988) The acquisition of reflexives and pronouns by Icelandic children. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 27 Stanford University [rDL]
Slobin D. (1968) Recall of full and truncated passives in connected discourse Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7:876–81. [CES]
Slobin D I. (1985a) Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Theoretical issues, ed. Slobin D. I.. Erlbaum. [ADG]
Slobin D I. (1985b) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 1: The data. Erlbaum. [ADG]
Smith F. & Miller G. (1966) The genesis of language. A psycholinguistic approach. MIT Press. [MPL]
Snow C. (1972) Mothers' speech to children learning language. Child Development 43:549–65. [CES]
Snow C. (1977) Mothers' speech research. From input to interaction. In: Talking to children. Language input and acquisition, ed. Snow C. E. & Ferguson C. A.. Cambridge University Press. [aDL, ADG, CES]
Snow C. (1982) The uses of imitation. Journal of Child Language 8:205–12. [CES]
Snow C. (1983) Saying it again: The role of expanded and deferred imitations in language acquisition. In: Children's language, vol. 4, ed. Nelson K. EGardner Press. [CES]
Snow C. (in press) Understanding social interaction and language development: Sentences are not enough. In. Interaction in human development, ed. Borstein M & Bruner J.. Erlbaum. [CES]
Snow C E. & Ferguson C. A., eds. (1977) Talking to children language input and acquisition. Cambridge University Press [ADC]
Snow C., Perlmann R. & Nathan D. (1987) Why routines are different Towards a multi-factors model of the relation between input and language acquisition. In: Children's language, vol. 6, ed. Nelson K. E. & Klceck A van. Erlbaum. [CES]
Sportiche D. (1981) On bounding nodes in French. Linguistic Review 1.219–46. [aDL, RF]
Stabler E. P. Jr (forthcoming) The logical approach to syntax. [EPS]
Tomasello M. (1987) Learning to use prepositions. A case study Journal of Child Language 14:7998. [CES]
Tomasello M. (forthcoming) Verbs and grammar in early child language. A case study. Cambridge University Press. [CES]
Torrego E. (1984) On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry 15:103–29. [HWB, WW]
Travis L. (1987) Parameters of phrase structure. Mimeo, McGill University. [aDL]
Valiant L. G. (1984) A theory of the learnable. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 27:1134–42. [AKJ]
Van Oosten J. (1977) Subjecthood and agenthood in English Papers from the thirteenth regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. University of Chicago Press. [IMS]
Vincent N. (1987) English seem and Italian sembrare. The ongin of thematically empty subjects. Paper delivered at the Fifth International Conference of English Historical Linguistics, Cambridge, 04. [NV]
Warner A. (1983) Review article on Lightfoot (1979). Journal of Linguitics 19.187209. [aDL]
Weinberg A. (1987) Comments on Borer and Wexler In. Parameter setting. ed Roeper T & Williams E.. Reidel. [rDL, GC]
Weinberg A S., Aoun J., N Hornstein. & Lightfoot D. W. (1987) Two types of locality. Linguistic Inquiry 18:537–77 [aDL]
Weinreich U., Labov W & Herzog M. I (1968) Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In: Directions for historical linguistics, ed. Lehmann W P. & Malkiel Y.. University of Texas Press. [ADG]
Wells G. (1981) Learning through interaction. The study of language development. Cambridge University Press. [arDL. CES]
Wexler K. & Cuhcover P. W. (1980) Formal principles of language acquisition. MIT Press. [arDL, RC, JG. HL, JLM, WW]
Wexler K. & Manzini R (1987) Parameters and learnability in the binding theory. In. Parameter setting, ed. Roeper T & Williams E.Reidel. [RC]
White L. (1987) A note on Phinney. In. Parameter setting, ed. Roeper T. & Williams E.Reidel. [HWB]
Wilcoxon S. M. (1988) Binding in Mandann Chinese. Another look at ziji. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin. [rDL, CLB]
Williams E. (1987) Introduction. In: Parameter setting, ed. Roeper T & Williams E.. Reidel. [HWB]
Williams M. M. (1973) A case of unmarked subordination in Tuscarora. In: You take the high node and I'll take the low node. Papers from the Comparative Syntax Festival, ed. Corum C, Stark T C. Smith & Weiser A.. Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago. [TW]
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 69 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 307 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.