Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 482
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Apostolou, Menelaos 2016. The Nature of Parent-Offspring Conflict over Mating: from Differences in Genetic Relatedness to Disagreement over Mate Choice. Evolutionary Psychological Science,

    ARNOCKY, STEVEN WOODRUFF, NATHAN and SCHMITT, DAVID P. 2016. Men's sociosexuality is sensitive to changes in mate availability. Personal Relationships, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 172.

    Brandon, Marianne 2016. Monogamy and Nonmonogamy: Evolutionary Considerations and Treatment Challenges. Sexual Medicine Reviews,

    Carrito, Mariana de Lurdes Santos, Isabel Maria Barbas dos Lefevre, Carmen Emilia Whitehead, Ross David Silva, Carlos Fernandes da and Perrett, David Ian 2016. The role of sexually dimorphic skin colour and shape in attractiveness of male faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 125.

    Chaby, Lauren E. 2016. Why are there lasting effects from exposure to stress during development? An analysis of current models of early stress. Physiology & Behavior, Vol. 164, p. 164.

    DiDonato, Theresa E. and Jakubiak, Brittany K. 2016. Sustainable Decisions Signal Sustainable Relationships: How Purchasing Decisions Affect Perceptions and Romantic Attraction. The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 156, Issue. 1, p. 8.

    Dixson, Barnaby J. W. and Rantala, Markus J. 2016. The Role of Facial and Body Hair Distribution in Women’s Judgments of Men’s Sexual Attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 45, Issue. 4, p. 877.

    Doll, Leslie M. Cárdenas, Rodrigo A. Burriss, Robert P. and Puts, David A. 2016. Sexual Selection and Life History: Earlier Recalled Puberty Predicts Men’s Phenotypic Masculinization. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, p. 134.

    DONAHUE, JOHN K. and GREEN, MELANIE C. 2016. A good story: Men's storytelling ability affects their attractiveness and perceived status. Personal Relationships, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 199.

    Durante, Kristina M. Eastwick, Paul W. Finkel, Eli J. Gangestad, Steven W. and Simpson, Jeffry A. 2016.

    Frederick, David A. and Fales, Melissa R. 2016. Upset Over Sexual versus Emotional Infidelity Among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 45, Issue. 1, p. 175.

    Giudice, Marco Del and Ellis, Bruce J. 2016. Developmental Psychopathology.

    Gracia, M.C. and Huertas-Garcia, R. 2016. Decision making and erotic stimuli: An evolutionary perspective. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 30.

    Han, Chengyang Hahn, Amanda C. Fisher, Claire I. Debruine, Lisa M. and Jones, Benedict C. 2016. Women's facial attractiveness is related to their body mass index but not their salivary cortisol. American Journal of Human Biology, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 352.

    Jeffery, Austin John Pham, Michael N. Shackelford, Todd K. and Fink, Bernhard 2016. Does human ejaculate quality relate to phenotypic traits?. American Journal of Human Biology, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 318.

    Jonason, Peter K. and Balzarini, Rhonda N. 2016. The Psychology of Love and Hate in Intimate Relationships.

    Lee, Anthony J. Mitchem, Dorian G. Wright, Margaret J. Martin, Nicholas G. Keller, Matthew C. and Zietsch, Brendan P. 2016. Facial averageness and genetic quality: testing heritability, genetic correlation with attractiveness, and the paternal age effect. Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 61.

    Li, Yi Ming Li, Jian Chan, Darius K.-S. and Zhang, Bo 2016. When Love Meets Money: Priming the Possession of Money Influences Mating Strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,

    Lindová, Jitka Little, Anthony C. Havlíček, Jan Roberts, S. Craig Rubešová, Anna and Flegr, Jaroslav 2016. Effect of Partnership Status on Preferences for Facial Self-Resemblance. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,

    Lucchi Basili, Lorenza and Sacco, Pier 2016. Tie-Up Cycles in Long-Term Mating. Part I: Theory. Challenges, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 12.


The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism

  • Steven W. Gangestad (a1) and Jeffry A. Simpson (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 August 2000

During human evolutionary history, there were “trade-offs” between expending time and energy on child-rearing and mating, so both men and women evolved conditional mating strategies guided by cues signaling the circumstances. Many short-term matings might be successful for some men; others might try to find and keep a single mate, investing their effort in rearing her offspring. Recent evidence suggests that men with features signaling genetic benefits to offspring should be preferred by women as short-term mates, but there are trade-offs between a mate's genetic fitness and his willingness to help in child-rearing. It is these circumstances and the cues that signal them that underlie the variation in short- and long-term mating strategies between and within the sexes.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *