Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 32
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Herzog, Stefan M. and von Helversen, Bettina 2016. Strategy Selection Versus Strategy Blending: A Predictive Perspective on Single- and Multi-Strategy Accounts in Multiple-Cue Estimation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,

    Lupyan, Gary and Bergen, Benjamin 2016. How Language Programs the Mind. Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 408.

    Perry, Lynn K. and Lupyan, Gary 2016. Recognising a zebra from its stripes and the stripes from “zebra”: the role of verbal labels in selecting category relevant information. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, p. 1.

    Opitz, Bertram and Hofmann, Juliane 2015. Concurrence of rule- and similarity-based mechanisms in artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 77, p. 77.

    Roehr-Brackin, Karen 2015. Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages.

    Scholz, Agnes von Helversen, Bettina and Rieskamp, Jörg 2015. Eye movements reveal memory processes during similarity- and rule-based decision making. Cognition, Vol. 136, p. 228.

    Ziori, Eleni and Pothos, Emmanuel 2015. Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages.

    Comins, Jordan A and Gentner, Timothy Q 2014. Temporal pattern processing in songbirds. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, Vol. 28, p. 179.

    Hayes, Brett K. Heit, Evan and Rotello, Caren M. 2014. Memory, reasoning, and categorization: parallels and common mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5,

    Kalish, Charles W. and Thevenow-Harrison, Jordan T. 2014.

    Nyamsuren, Enkhbold and Taatgen, Niels A. 2014. Human Reasoning Module. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, Vol. 8, p. 1.

    Perry, Lynn K. and Lupyan, Gary 2014. The role of language in multi-dimensional categorization: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation and exposure to verbal labels. Brain and Language, Vol. 135, p. 66.

    Lupyan, Gary Mirman, Daniel Hamilton, Roy and Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. 2012. Categorization is modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation over left prefrontal cortex. Cognition, Vol. 124, Issue. 1, p. 36.

    Manzini, Paola and Mariotti, Marco 2012. CATEGORIZE THEN CHOOSE: BOUNDEDLY RATIONAL CHOICE AND WELFARE. Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 10, Issue. 5, p. 1141.

    Sandberg, Chaleece Sebastian, Rajani and Kiran, Swathi 2012. Typicality mediates performance during category verification in both ad-hoc and well-defined categories. Journal of Communication Disorders, Vol. 45, Issue. 2, p. 69.

    Klippel, Alexander 2011. Movement Choremes: Bridging Cognitive Understanding and Formal Characterizations of Movement Patterns1. Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 3, Issue. 4, p. 722.

    Langhe, Bart de van Osselaer, Stijn M.J. and Wierenga, Berend 2011. The effects of process and outcome accountability on judgment process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 115, Issue. 2, p. 238.

    Voorspoels, Wouter Storms, Gert and Vanpaemel, Wolf 2011. Representation at different levels in a conceptual hierarchy. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 138, Issue. 1, p. 11.

    Darlow, Adam L. and Sloman, Steven A. 2010. Two systems of reasoning: architecture and relation to emotion. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, Vol. 1, Issue. 3, p. 382.

    Koenig, Phyllis Smith, Edward E. and Grossman, Murray 2010. Categorization of novel tools by patients with Alzheimer's disease: Category-specific content and process. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 48, Issue. 7, p. 1877.


The rules versus similarity distinction

  • Emmanuel M. Pothos (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2005

The distinction between rules and similarity is central to our understanding of much of cognitive psychology. Two aspects of existing research have motivated the present work. First, in different cognitive psychology areas we typically see different conceptions of rules and similarity; for example, rules in language appear to be of a different kind compared to rules in categorization. Second, rules processes are typically modeled as separate from similarity ones; for example, in a learning experiment, rules and similarity influences would be described on the basis of separate models. In the present article, I assume that the rules versus similarity distinction can be understood in the same way in learning, reasoning, categorization, and language, and that a unified model for rules and similarity is appropriate. A rules process is considered to be a similarity one where only a single or a small subset of an object's properties are involved. Hence, rules and overall similarity operations are extremes in a single continuum of similarity operations. It is argued that this viewpoint allows adequate coverage of theory and empirical findings in learning, reasoning, categorization, and language, and also a reassessment of the objectives in research on rules versus similarity.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *