Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Dominant-language replacement: The case of international adoptees*

  • KENNETH HYLTENSTAM (a1), EMANUEL BYLUND (a1), NICLAS ABRAHAMSSON (a1) and HYEON-SOOK PARK (a2)
Abstract

This article challenges a recent proposal for the theoretical interpretation of L1 and L2 interaction that results from the abrupt change of language environment in internationally adopted children. According to this proposal (Pallier, Dehaene, Poline, LeBihan, Argenti, Depoux and Mehler, 2003; Ventureyra, Pallier and Yoo, 2004), such children experience a total loss of their L1, while, as adults, they exhibit a nativelike ultimate attainment of their L2. These authors suggest that what they see as a total loss of L1 allows a resetting of the neural network that normally subserves L1 retention and hence permits a complete acquisition of the L2. Data from two of our own research projects, one on L1 remnants in Korean adoptees in Sweden (see Park, forthcoming), and the other on age of acquisition and ultimate L2 attainment of Swedish (see Abrahamsson and Hyltenstam, in press), which included data from Latin American adoptees in Sweden among other participants, suggest (i) that L1 remnants are indeed maintained, (ii) that L2 attainment is not enhanced by severe L1 attrition, and (iii) that there is an age dimension to both the degree of L1 attrition and the level of L2 ultimate attainment in international adoptees. We therefore contend that a maturational interpretation of language replacement data is preferable.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, SE – 106 91 Stockholm, Swedenkenneth.hyltenstam@biling.su.se
Footnotes
Hide All

This work was supported by the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation, grant No. 1999-0383:01 to K. H. and N. A. and grant no. J2001-0244:1,2,3 to H.-S. P. We would like to thank Katrin Stölten for carrying out the phonetic analyses of VOT production and categorical perception. We are also grateful to Christopher Stroud for comments on an earlier draft and Thomas Lavelle for checking and correcting our English writing.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

T. Au , L. Knightly , S.-A. Jun & J. Oh (2002). Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13 (3), 238243.

H. P. Bahrick (1984). Semantic memory content in permastore: Fifty years of memory for Spanish learned in school. Journal of Experimantal Psychology: General, 113 (1), 126.

T. Bongaerts (2005). Introduction: Ultimate attainment and the Critical Period Hypothesis for second language acquisition. IRAL, 43 (3), 259267.

R. Burling (1959). Language development of a Garo and English-speaking child. Word, 15, 4568.

M. Cheour , R. Ceponiene , A. Lehtokoski , A. Luuk , J. Allik , K. Alho & R. Näätänen (1998). Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 351353.

S. Curtiss (1977). Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern-day “wild child”. New York: Academic Press.

K. de Bot , V. Martens & S. Stoessel (2004). Finding residual lexical knowledge: The “Savings” approach to testing vocabulary. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8 (3), 373382.

K. de Bot & S. Stoessel (2000). In search of yesterday's words: Reactivating a long forgotten language. Applied Linguistics, 21 (3), 364388.

J. E. Flege , E. M. Frieda & T. Nozawa (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169186.

J. E. Flege , M. Munro & I. MacKay (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 76 (3), 708721.

N. Francis (2005). Research findings in attrition: Implications for the Critical Period Hypothesis. Language Learning, 55 (3), 491531.

S. Glennen & M. G. Masters (2002), Typical and atypical language development in infants and toddlers adopted from Eastern Europe. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 417433.

K. Hyltenstam (1992). Non-native features in near-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In R. Harris (ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals, pp. 351368. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

K. Hyltenstam & N. Abrahamsson (2000). Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some or none? Studia Linguistica, 54 (2), 150166.

J. Johnson & E. Newport (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 6099.

C. W. Kim (1965), On the autonomy of the tensity feature in stop classification (with special reference to Korean stops). Word, 21, 339359.

B. Köpke & M. Schmid (2004). Language attrition: The next phase. In M. Schmid , B. Köpke , M. Keijzer & L. Weilemar , (eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues, pp. 143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

R. Krakow & J. Roberts (2003). Acquisition of English vocabulary by young Chinese adoptees. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 1 (3), 169176.

P. Kuhl , K. Williams , F. Lacerda , K. Stevens & B. Lindblom (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606608.

M. Long (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis. IRAL, 43 (3), 287317.

R. Mayberry & E. Lock (2003). Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: Evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesist. Brain and Language, 87 (3), 369384.

J. L. McDonald (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 395423.

J. Oh , S.-A. Jun , L. Knightly & T. Au (2003). Holding on to childhood language memory. Cognition, 86, B53B64.

C. Pallier , S. Dehaene , J.-B. Poline , D. LeBihan , A.-M. Argenti , E. Dupoux & J. Mehler (2003). Brain imaging of language plasticity in adopted adults: Can a second language replace the first? Cerebral Cortex, 13, 155161.

F. Pulvermüller & J. Schumann (1994). Neurobiological mechanisms of language acquisition. Language Learning, 44 (4), 681784.

J. Roberts , R. Krakow & K. Pollock (2003). Language outcomes for preschool children adopted from China as infants and toddlers. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 1 (3), 177183.

R. Ruben (1997). A time frame of critical/sensitive periods of language development. Acta Otolaryngologica, 117, 202205.

R. Ruben (1999). Persistency of an effect: Otitis media during the first year of life with nine years follow-up. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 49, 115118.

J. Snedeker , J. Geren & C. Shafto (2007). Starting over: International adoption as a natural experiment in language development. Psychological Science, 18 (1), 7987.

K. Tsukada , D. Birdsong , E. Bialystok , M. Mack , H. Sung & J. Flege (2005). A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics, 33, 263290.

M. H. van Ijzendoorn , F. Juffer & C. W. Klein Poelhuis (2005). Adoption and cognitive development: A meta-analytic comparison of adopted and non-adopted children's IQ and school performance. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 301316.

V. Ventureyra , C. Pallier & H. Yoo (2004). The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17 (1), 7991.

J. Werker & R. Tees (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7 (1), 4963.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1366-7289
  • EISSN: 1469-1841
  • URL: /core/journals/bilingualism-language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score