Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Fusion legislation and forensic psychiatry: the criminal justice provisions of the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016

  • Philip Campbell and Keith Rix
Summary

Fusion legislation is the latest in a long line of reforms in mental health law that have sought to increase patient autonomy. It has not been without controversy, having been proposed and rejected in various jurisdictions throughout the UK and internationally, while causing considerable debate in the academic literature. This article considers some of the history and debate, along with the criminal justice provisions of the first piece of fusion legislation internationally, the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016, and their potential implications.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

  • Understand the history of fusion legislation in the UK and internationally
  • Understand the advantages and disadvantages of fusion legislation
  • Understand the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016 criminal justice provisions

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence Dr Philip Campbell, Bluestone Unit, Craigavon Area Hospital, 68 Lurgan Rd, Portadown, Craigavon BT63 5QQ, UK. Email: philcampbell@doctors.net.uk
References
Hide All
Applebaum, S (2010) Harnessing the power of fusion? A valiant but flawed effort to obviate the need for mental health law. Journal of Mental Health Law, 20: 2533.
Burns, T (2010) Mental illness is different and ignoring its differences profits no one. Journal of Mental Health Law, 20: 34–9.
Department of Health (1999) Review of the Mental Health Act 1983: Report of the Expert Committee. Department of Health. (http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120503230453/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4062614.pdf).
Dornan, J, Kennedy, M, Garland, J, et al. (2015) Functional mental capacity, treatment as usual and time: magnitude of change in secure hospital patients with major mental illness. BMC Research Notes, 8: 566.
Fazel, S, Seewald, K (2012) Severe mental illness in 33,588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 200: 364–73.
Fistein, EC, Holland, AJ, Gunn, MJ (2009) A comparison of mental health legislation from diverse Commonwealth jurisdictions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32: 147–55.
Gledhill, K (2010) A model law for fusing incapacity and mental health legislation – a comment on the forensic aspects of the proposal. Journal of Mental Health Law, 20: 4754.
Harper, C, Davidson, G, McClelland, R (2016) No longer ‘anomalous, confusing and unjust’: the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016. International Journal of Mental Health and Capacity Law, 22: 5770.
Kelly, B (2016) Mental Illness, Human Rights, and the Law. RCPsych Publications.
Law Commission (2016) Unfitness to Plead (Law Com No 364). TSO (The Stationery Office).
Nathan, R, Rix, KJB (2016) A special case for personality disorder: are the distinctions between personality disorder and mental illness in clinical and legal practice justified? In Legal Perspectives on State Power: Consent and Control (eds Ashford, C, Reed, A, Wake, N): 284–308. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Northern Ireland Law Commission (2013) Report: Unfitness to Plead (NILC 16 (2013)). NILC.
Rix, KJB, Agarwal, M (1999) Risk of serious harm or a serious risk of harm? A trap for judges. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 10: 187–96.
Rix, KJB (2012) Fitness to plead and fitness to stand trial – Then, now and in the future. Expert and Dispute Resolver, Summer: 1620.
Rix, KJB (2016) Towards a more just insanity defence: recovering moral wrongfulness in the M'Naghten Rules. BJPsych Advances, 22: 4452.
Scottish Executive (2000) Report of the Committee on Serious Violent and Sexual Offenders. Scottish Executive.
Scottish Executive (2001) New Directions: Report on the Review of the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984. TSO (The Stationery Office).
Szmukler, G, Daw, R, Dawson, J (2010) A model law for fusing incapacity and mental health legislation. Journal of Mental Health Law, 20: 1124.
Szmukler, G, Daw, R, Callard, F (2014) Mental health law and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37: 245–52.
United Nations (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations.
Banks v Goodfellow (1870) 5 QB 549.
M'Naghten's Case (1843) 10 Cl & F 200.
Re JR 45 Application (2011) NIQB 17.
R v Dyson (1831) 7 C&P 303.
R v Hackett [2015] NICA 57.
R v M (John) [2003] EWCA Crim 3452 CA.
R v Pritchard (1836) 7 C&P 303.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Advances
  • ISSN: 2056-4678
  • EISSN: 2056-4686
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-advances
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 50 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 214 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 25th April 2018 - 25th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Fusion legislation and forensic psychiatry: the criminal justice provisions of the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016

  • Philip Campbell and Keith Rix
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *