Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

A capital Scot: microscopes and museums in Robert E. Grant's zoology (1815–1840)

  • TOM QUICK (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Early nineteenth-century zoology in Britain has been characterized as determined by the ideological concerns of its proponents. Taking the zoologist Robert E. Grant as an exemplary figure in this regard, this article offers a differently nuanced account of the conditions under which natural-philosophical knowledge concerning animal life was established in post-Napoleonic Britain. Whilst acknowledging the ideological import of concepts such as force and law, it points to an additional set of concerns amongst natural philosophers – that of appropriate tool use in investigation. Grant's studies in his native Edinburgh relied heavily on the use of microscopes. On his arrival in London, however, he entered a culture in which a different set of objects – museum specimens – held greater persuasive power. This article relates changes in Grant's ideas and practices to the uneven emphases on microscopic and museological evidence amongst European, Scottish and English natural philosophers at this time. In so doing, it identifies the reliance of London-based natural philosophers on museology as constituting a limiting effect on the kinds of claim that Grant sought to make regarding the nature of life.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Adrian Desmond , ‘Robert E. Grant: the social predicament of a pre-Darwinian transmutationist’, Journal of the History of Biology (1984) 17, pp. 189223

Dairmid A. Finnegan , ‘The spatial turn: geographical approaches in the history of science’, Journal of the History of Biology (2008) 41, pp. 369388

Adrian Desmond and Sarah Parker , ‘The bibliography of Robert Edmond Grant’, Archives of Natural History (2006) 33, pp. 202213

Biographical sketch of Robert Edmond Grant, M.D., F.R.S.L. & E, &c.’, The Lancet (1850) 56, pp. 686695

Adrian Desmond , ‘Robert E. Grant's later views on organic development: the Swiney Lectures on “palaeozoology,” 1853–1857’, Archives of Natural History (1984) 11, pp. 395413

William Bynum , ‘The Great Chain of Being after forty years: an appraisal’, History of Science (1975) 13, pp. 128

Nick Hopwood , James Secord and Simon Schaffer , ‘Seriality and scientific objects’, History of Science (2010) 48, pp. 251285

L.S. Jacyna , ‘Immanence or transcendence: theories of life and organization in Britain, 1790–1835’, Isis (1983) 74, pp. 310329

Edward Turner , ‘To James Mill, Esq. chairman of the education committeeThe Lancet (1835) 26, p. 844

John H. Warner , ‘The history of science and the sciences of medicine’, Osiris, 2nd series (1995) 10, pp. 164193

Daniel J. Nicholson , ‘Biological atomism and cell theory’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences (2010) 41, pp. 202211

Olivier Rieppel , ‘The reception of Leibniz's philosophy in the writings of Charles Bonnet (1720–1793)’, Journal of the History of Biology (1988) 21, pp. 119145

Susannah Gibson , ‘On being animal, or, the eighteenth-century zoophyte controversy in Britain’, History of Science (2012), pp. 453474

L.S. Jacyna , ‘John Goodsir and the making of cellular reality’, Journal of the History of Biology (1983) 16, pp. 7599

Jacyna , ‘“A host of experienced microscopists”: the establishment of histology in nineteenth-century Edinburgh’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine (2001) 75, pp. 225253

L.S. Jacyna , ‘Moral fibre: the negotiation of microscopic facts in Victorian Britain’, Journal of the History of Biology (2003) 36, pp. 3985

Joseph J. Lister , ‘On some properties in achromatic object-glasses applicable to the improvement of the microscope’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1830) 120, pp. 187200

Joseph J. Lister , ‘Some observations on the structure and functions of tubular and cellular Polypi, and of Ascidae’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1834) 124, pp. 365388

Pietro Corsi , ‘Before Darwin: transformist concepts in European natural philosophy’, Journal of the History of Biology (2005) 38, pp. 6783

Pietro Corsi , ‘A devil's chaplain calling?’, Journal of Victorian Culture (1998) 3, pp. 129137

Martin Rudwick , ‘Georges Cuvier's paper museum of fossil bones’, Archives of Natural History (2000) 27, pp. 5167

Adrian Desmond , ‘The making of institutional zoology in London, 1822–1836’ [Parts I and II], History of Science (1985) 23, pp. 153185

Richard Owen , ‘Remarks on the Entozoa, and on the structural differences existing amongst them: including suggestions for their distribution into other classes’, Transactions of the Zoological Society (1833–1835) 1, pp. 387394

Alison Kraft and Samuel J.M.M. Alberti , ‘“Equal though different”: laboratories, museums and the institutional development of biology in late-Victorian northern England’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (2003) 34, pp. 203236

Andrew Reynolds , ‘Amoebae as exemplary cells: the protean nature of an elementary organism’, Journal of the History of Biology (2008) 41, pp. 307337

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal for the History of Science
  • ISSN: 0007-0874
  • EISSN: 1474-001X
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-for-the-history-of-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 58 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 327 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.