Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

‘Most rare workmen’: optical practitioners in early seventeenth-century Delft


A special interest in optics among various seventeenth-century painters living in the Dutch city of Delft has intrigued historians, including art historians, for a long time. Equally, the impressive career of the Delft microscopist Antoni van Leeuwenhoek has been studied by many historians of science. However, it has never been investigated who, at that time, had access to the mathematical and optical knowledge necessary for the impressive achievements of these Delft practitioners. We have tried to gain insight into Delft as a ‘node’ of optical knowledge by following the careers of three minor local figures in early seventeenth-century Delft. We argue that through their work, products, discussions in the vernacular and exchange of skills, rather than via learned publications, these practitioners constituted a foundation on which the later scientific and artistic achievements of other Delft citizens were built. Our Delft case demonstrates that these practitioners were not simple and isolated craftsmen; rather they were crucial components in a network of scholars, savants, painters and rich virtuosi. Decades before Vermeer made his masterworks, or Van Leeuwenhoek started his famous microscopic investigations, the intellectual atmosphere and artisanal knowledge in this city centred on optical topics.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Harold Cook , Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007

David Livingstone , Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003

J.C. Rupp , ‘Matters of life and death: the social and cultural conditions of the rise of anatomical theatres, with special reference to seventeenth-century Holland’, History of Science (1990) 28, pp. 263287

A. Bredius , ‘De schilders Pieter en Harmen Steenwijck’, Oud Holland (1890) 8, pp. 143148

A.D.C. Simpson , ‘Richard Reeve – the English Campani – and the origins of the London Telescope-making tradition’, Vistas in Astronomy (1985) 28, pp. 357365

S. Koslow , ‘De wonderlijke Perspectiefkas: An aspect of seventeenth-century Dutch Painting’, in Oud-Holland 82 (1967), pp. 3556

Agnes Verweij , ‘Perspective in a box’, Nexus Network Journal (2010) 12, pp. 4762

Rolf Willach , ‘The development of telescope optics in the middle of the seventeenth century’, Annals of Science (2001) 58, pp. 381398

Fokko Jan Dijksterhuis , ‘A view from the mountain: the development of Isaac Vossius’ Optics, 1658–1666’, in Eric Jorink and Dirk Van Miert (eds.), Isaac Vossius (1618–1689): Between Science and Scholarship, Leiden: Brill, 2012, pp. 157188

J.M. Montias , ‘Vermeer and his milieu: conclusions of an archival study’, Oud Holland (1980) 94, pp. 50

R. Ruurs , ‘Pieter Saenredam: his books and his relationship with the surveyor Pieter Wils’, Oud Holland (1983) 97, pp. 5968

Clotilde Brière-Misme , ‘Un émule de Vermeer et de Pieter de Hooch: Cornélis de Man’, Oud Holland (1935) 52, pp. 126

James Welu , ‘Vermeer's astronomer: observations on an open book’, Art Bulletin (1986) 68, pp. 263267

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal for the History of Science
  • ISSN: 0007-0874
  • EISSN: 1474-001X
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-for-the-history-of-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 29 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 273 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.