Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T00:39:10.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antibiotics in the Diet of the Fattening Pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. S. Barber ,
R. Braude ,
S. K. Kon  and
K. G. Mitchell
R. S. Barber
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
R. Braude
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
S. K. Kon
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
K. G. Mitchell
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 1953 , pp. 306 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1953

References

Barber, R. S., Braude, R., Kon, S. K. & Mitchell, K. G. (1952). Chem. & Ind. p. 713.Google Scholar
Berridge, N. J. & Barrett, J. (1952). Biochem. J. 51, iii.Google Scholar
Bessel, C. J., Harrison, E. & Lees, K. A. (1950). Chem. & Ind. p. 561.Google Scholar
Betts, A. O. (1952). Vet. Rec. 64, 283.Google Scholar
Braude, R. (1947). Vet. Rec. 59, 165.Google Scholar
Braude, R., Kon, S. K. & Mitchell, K. G. (1951). Brit. J. Nutr. 5, viii.Google Scholar
Braude, R., Kon, S. K. & Porter, J. W. G. (1953). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 23, 47.Google Scholar
Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1949–50). J. Minist. Agric. 56, 369.Google Scholar
Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1950–1951). J. Minist. Agric. 57, 501.Google Scholar
Braude, R., Wallace, H. D. & Cunha, T. J. (1953). Antibiot. Chemother. 3, 271.Google Scholar
British Pharmacopoeia (1948 a). Appendix 15, p. 816.Google Scholar
British Pharmacopoeia (1948 b). Addendum (1951), Appendix 15, p. 95.Google Scholar
Burgess, R. C., Gluck, M., Brisson, G. & Laughland, D. H. (1951). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 33, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M. E., Harrison, G. F., Kon, S. K., Porter, J. W. G. & Thompson, S. Y. (1952). Chem. & Ind. 9. 149.Google Scholar
Ford, J. E. (1952). Brit. J. Nutr. 6, 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gall, L. S., Stark, C. N. & Loosli, J. K. (1947). J. Dairy Sci. 30, 891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, E., Lees, K. A. & Wood, F. (1951). Analyst, 76, 696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). J. agric. Sci. 30, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokstad, E. L. R., Jukes, T. H., Pierce, T., Page, A. C. Jr. & Franklin, A. L. (1949). J. biol. Chem. 180, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. Y., Ganguly, J. & Kon, S. K. (1949). Brit. J. Nutr. 3, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Evans, R. E. (1951). J. agric. Sci. 41, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, F. (1933). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 1, 129.Google Scholar