Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Effect of the nationwide free school fruit scheme in Norway

  • Elling Bere (a1), Marit Hilsen (a1) (a2) and Knut-Inge Klepp (a2)
Abstract

In Norway, children and adolescents consume only about half of the national five-a-day recommendation. There are also rather large social inequalities in health, and in eating behaviours. In order to increase fruit and vegetable (FV) intake, a subscription programme was initiated in 1996 and made nationwide in 2003, and a free programme (without parental payment) has been implemented nationwide from 2007. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the effect of these efforts. Pupils in the sixth and seventh grades (age 10–12 years) at twenty-seven schools responded to a questionnaire in 2001 (n 1488, 85 %) and in 2008 (n 1339, 78 %). FV intake was measured by a 24-h recall. In 2001, none of the schools had any organised school fruit programme. In 2008, five schools participated in the free school fruit programme, ten schools participated in the subscription programme and twelve schools did not participate in any official programme. The increases in fruit intake at school were 0·49, 0·29 and 0·18 portions/school day, respectively, for the Free Fruit 08, Subscription 08 and No Programme 08 schools (time × group P < 0·001), and 0·74, 0·39 and 0·16 portions/d for fruit intake all day (time × group P = 0·04). No group effect was observed for vegetable intake. There has been an increase in pupils' fruit intake from 2001 to 2008 in Norway, and the school fruit programmes seem to have been effective. A great challenge remains in increasing vegetable intake.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Effect of the nationwide free school fruit scheme in Norway
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Effect of the nationwide free school fruit scheme in Norway
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Effect of the nationwide free school fruit scheme in Norway
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Elling Bere, fax +47 38141301, email elling.bere@uia.no
References
Hide All
1World Health Organization (2003) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. Technical Report Series no. 916. Geneva: WHO.
2World Health Organization (2004) Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Geneva: WHO.
3Øverby, NC & Andersen, LF (2002) Ungkost-2000: Landsomfattende kostholdsundersøkelse blant elever i 4. og 8. klasse i Norge (Ungkost-2000: Nationwide Nutrition Survey Among Students in classes 4 and 8 in Norway). Oslo: Sosial- og helsedirektoratet.
4Kelder, SH, Perry, CL, Klepp, K-I, et al. (1994) Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical-activity, and food choice behaviours. Am J Public Health 84, 11211126.
5Lien, N, Lytle, LA & Klepp, K-I (2001) Stability in consumption of fruit, vegetables, and sugary foods in a cohort from age 14 to age 21. Prev Med 33, 217226.
6Bere, E, Veierød, MB & Klepp, K-I (2005) The Norwegian School Fruit Program: evaluating paid vs. no-cost subscriptions. Prev Med 41, 463470.
7Bere, E, Veierød, MB, Bjelland, M, et al. (2006) Free school fruit – sustained effect 1 year later. Health Educ Res 21, 268275.
8Bere, E, Veierød, MB, Skare, Ø, et al. (2007) Free school fruit – sustained effect three years later. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 4, 5.
9Bere, E & Klepp, K-I (2006) Free vs. paid school fruit program – big difference with respect to social inequality. In Ethics and the Politics of Food. Preprints of the 6th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, 22–24 June, 2006, pp. 353357 [Kaiser, M and Lien, M, editors]. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
10Jaime, PC & Lock, K (2009) Do school based food and nutrition policies improve diet and reduce obesity? Prev Med 48, 4553.
11de Sa, J & Lock, K (2008) Will European agricultural policy for school fruit and vegetables improve public health? A review of school fruit and vegetable programmes. Eur J Public Health 18, 558568.
12Sosial- og helsedirektoratet (2005) Sosial- og helsedirektoratets handlingsplan mot sosiale ulikheter i helse: Gradientutfordringen (Social and Health Directorate's Action Plan on Social Inequalities in Health: Gradientutfordringen). Oslo: Sosial- og helsedirektoratet.
13Bere, E, Brug, J & Klepp, K-I (2008) Why do boys eat less fruit and vegetables than girls? Public Health Nutr 11, 321325.
14Bere, E, van Lenthe, F, Klepp, K-I, et al. (2008) Why do parents' education level and income affect the amount of fruits and vegetables adolescents eat? Eur J Public Health 18, 611615.
15Det kongelige helse- og omsorgsdepartementet (2007) St.meld nr. 20 (2006–2007): Nasjonal strategi for å utjevne sosiale helseforskjeller (White Paper No. 20 (2006–2007): National Strategy to Equalize Social Health Differences). Oslo: Det kongelige helse- og omsorgsdepartementet.
16Det kongelige kunnskapsdepartement (2008) Ot.prp. nr. 40 (2007–2008): Om lov om endringar i opplæringslova og privatskolelova (Proposition. No. 40 (2007–2008): The Law on Changes in the Education Act and Private Law). Oslo: Det kongelige kunnskapsdepartement.
17Bere, E, Veierod, MB, Bjelland, M, et al. (2006) Outcome and process evaluation of a Norwegian school-randomized fruit and vegetable intervention: fruits and vegetables make the marks (FVMM). Health Educ Res 21, 258267.
18Andersen, LF, Bere, E, Kolbjørnsen, N, et al. (2004) Validity and reproducibility of self-reported intake of fruit and vegetable among 6th graders. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 771777.
19Wells, L & Nelson, M (2005) The national school fruit scheme produces short-term but not longer-term increases in fruit consumption in primary school children. Br J Nutr 93, 537542.
20Fogarty, AW, Antoniak, M, Venn, AJ, et al. (2007) Does participation in a population-based dietary intervention scheme have a lasting impact on fruit intake in young children? Int J Epidemiol 36, 10801085.
21Ransley, JK, Greenwood, DC, Cade, JE, et al. (2007) Does the school fruit and vegetable scheme improve children's diet? A non-randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Commun Health 61, 699703.
22Tak, NI, Te Velde, SJ & Brug, J (2008) Long-term effects of the Dutch schoolgruiten project – promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among primary-school children. Public Health Nutr 22, 111.
23Davis, EM, Cullen, CW, Watson, KB, et al. (2009) A fresh fruit and vegetable program improves high school students' consumption of fresh produce. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 12271231.
24Eriksen, K, Haraldsdottir, J, Pederson, R, et al. (2003) Effect of a fruit and vegetable subscription in Danish schools. Public Health Nutr 6, 5763.
25Ashfield-Watt, PAL, Stewart, EA & Scheffer, JA (2009) A pilot study of the effect of providing daily free fruit to primary-school children in Auckland, New Zealand. Public Health Nutr 12, 693701.
26European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/markets/fruitveg/sfs/ (accessed July 2009).
27Vejrup, K, Lien, N, Klepp, K-I, et al. (2008) Consumption of vegetables at dinner in a cohort of Norwegian adolescents. Appetite 51, 9096.
28Sælensminde, K (2006) Frukt og grønnsaker i skolen. Beregning av samfunnsøkonomisk lønnsomhet (Fruit and Vegetables in School. Calculation of the Economic Profitability). Oslo: Sosial- og helsedirektoratet.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed