Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Validation of a Web-based, self-administered, non-consecutive-day dietary record tool against urinary biomarkers

  • Camille Lassale (a1), Katia Castetbon (a2) (a3), François Laporte (a4), Géraldine M. Camilleri (a1), Valérie Deschamps (a2) (a3), Michel Vernay (a2) (a3), Patrice Faure (a4) (a5), Serge Hercberg (a1) (a2) (a3) (a6), Pilar Galan (a1) and Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot (a1)...
Abstract

New technologies are promising for the use of short-term instruments for dietary data collection; however, innovative tools should be validated against objective biomarkers. The aim of the present study was to investigate the validity of a Web-based, self-administered dietary record (DR) tool using protein, K and Na intakes against 24 h urinary biomarkers (24 h U). Of the total participants, 199 adult volunteers (104 men and 95 women, mean age 50·5 (23–83 years)) of the NutriNet-Santé Study were included in the protocol. They completed three non-consecutive-day DR and two 24 h U on the first and third DR days. Relative differences between reported (DR) and measured (24 h U) intakes were calculated from the log ratio (DR/24 h U) for protein, K and Na intakes: − 14·4,+2·6 and − 2·1 % for men; and − 13·9, − 3·7 and − 8·3 % for women, respectively. The correlations between reported and true intakes were 0·61, 0·78 and 0·47 for men and 0·64, 0·42 and 0·37 for women for protein, K and Na, respectively. Attenuation factors, that represent attenuation of the true diet–disease relationship due to measurement error (a value closer to 1 indicating lower attenuation), ranged from 0·23 (Na, women) to 0·60 (K, men). We showed that the Web-based DR tool used in the NutriNet-Santé cohort study performs well in estimating protein and K intakes and fairly well in estimating Na intake. Furthermore, three non-consecutive-day DR appear to be valid for estimating usual intakes of protein and K, although caution is advised regarding the generalisability of these findings to other nutrients and general population.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Validation of a Web-based, self-administered, non-consecutive-day dietary record tool against urinary biomarkers
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Validation of a Web-based, self-administered, non-consecutive-day dietary record tool against urinary biomarkers
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Validation of a Web-based, self-administered, non-consecutive-day dietary record tool against urinary biomarkers
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: C. Lassale, fax +33 1 48 38 89 31, email c.lassale@imperial.ac.uk; c.lassale@uren.smbh.univ-paris13.fr
References
Hide All
1 Kipnis, V, Midthune, D, Freedman, L, et al. (2002) Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology. Public Health Nutr 5, 915923.
2 Schatzkin, A, Subar, AF, Moore, S, et al. (2009) Observational epidemiologic studies of nutrition and cancer: the next generation (with better observation). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18, 10261032.
3 Kipnis, V, Midthune, D, Freedman, LS, et al. (2001) Empirical evidence of correlated biases in dietary assessment instruments and its implications. Am J Epidemiol 153, 394403.
4 Subar, AF, Kipnis, V, Troiano, RP, et al. (2003) Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study. Am J Epidemiol 158, 113.
5 Carroll, RJ, Midthune, D, Subar, AF, et al. (2012) Taking advantage of the strengths of 2 different dietary assessment instruments to improve intake estimates for nutritional epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 175, 340347.
6 Prentice, RL, Mossavar-Rahmani, Y, Huang, Y, et al. (2011) Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers. Am J Epidemiol 174, 591603.
7 Schatzkin, A, Kipnis, V, Carroll, RJ, et al. (2003) A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Int J Epidemiol 32, 10541062.
8 Hercberg, S (2012) Web-based studies: the future in nutritional epidemiology (and overarching epidemiology) for the benefit of public health? Prev Med 55, 544545.
9 Illner, AK, Freisling, H, Boeing, H, et al. (2012) Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 41, 11871203.
10 Kipnis, V, Subar, AF, Midthune, D, et al. (2003) Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study. Am J Epidemiol 158, 1421.
11 Freedman, LS, Kipnis, V, Schatzkin, A, et al. (2010) Can we use biomarkers in combination with self-reports to strengthen the analysis of nutritional epidemiologic studies? Epidemiol Perspect Innov 7, 2.
12 Lissner, L, Troiano, RP, Midthune, D, et al. (2007) OPEN about obesity: recovery biomarkers, dietary reporting errors and BMI. Int J Obes (Lond) 31, 956961.
13 Crispim, SP, de Vries, JH, Geelen, A, et al. (2011) Two non-consecutive 24 h recalls using EPIC-Soft software are sufficiently valid for comparing protein and potassium intake between five European centres – results from the European Food Consumption Validation (EFCOVAL) study. Br J Nutr 105, 447458.
14 Neuhouser, ML, Tinker, L, Shaw, PA, et al. (2008) Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol 167, 12471259.
15 Rhodes, DG, Murayi, T, Clemens, JC, et al. (2013) The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method accurately assesses population sodium intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 97, 958964.
16 Hercberg, S, Castetbon, K, Czernichow, S, et al. (2010) The Nutrinet-Sante Study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status. BMC Public Health 10, 242.
17 Touvier, M, Kesse-Guyot, E, Mejean, C, et al. (2010) Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies. Br J Nutr 105, 10551064.
18 Bingham, SA (2002) Biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology. Public Health Nutr 5, 821827.
19 Le Moullec, N, Deheeger, M, Preziosi, P, et al. (1996) Validation of the photo manual used for the collection of dietary data in the SU.VI.MAX. study. Cah Nutr Diet 31, 158164.
20 NutriNet-Santé Coordination (2013) Table de composition des aliments – Etude NutriNet-Santé (Food Composition Table – NutriNet-Santé Study). Paris: Economica.
21 Willett, WC (1998) Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
22 Subar, AF, Midthune, D, Tasevska, N, et al. (2013) Checking for completeness of 24-h urine collection using para-amino benzoic acid not necessary in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition study. Eur J Clin Nutr 67, 863867.
23 Neveux, N, David, P & Cynober, L (2004) Measurement of amino acid concentrations in biological fluids and tissues using ion exchange chromatography. In Metabolic and Therapeutic Aspects of Amino Acids in Clinical Nutrition, pp. 1728 [Cynober, L, editor]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
24 Lohman, T, Roche, A & Martorell, R (1988) Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
25 Bingham, SA (2003) Urine nitrogen as a biomarker for the validation of dietary protein intake. J Nutr 133, Suppl. 3, 921S924S.
26 Tasevska, N, Runswick, SA & Bingham, SA (2006) Urinary potassium is as reliable as urinary nitrogen for use as a recovery biomarker in dietary studies of free living individuals. J Nutr 136, 13341340.
27 Stein, J (1998) Internal Medicine. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences.
28 Spiegelman, D (2014) %icc9 SAS Program. Intraclass correlation coefficients and their 95 percent confidence intervals. http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/donna-spiegelman/software/icc9/ (accessed May 2014).
29 Arab, L, Tseng, CH, Ang, A, et al. (2011) Validity of a multipass, web-based, 24-hour self-administered recall for assessment of total energy intake in blacks and whites. Am J Epidemiol 174, 12561265.
30 Freedman, LS, Commins, JM, Moler, JE, et al. (2014) Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Am J Epidemiol 180, 172188.
31 Bingham, SA, Gill, C, Welch, A, et al. (1997) Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers. Int J Epidemiol 26, Suppl. 1, S137S151.
32 Kahn, HA, Whelton, PK, Appel, LJ, et al. (1995) Validity of 24-hour dietary recall interviews conducted among volunteers in an adult working community. Ann Epidemiol 5, 484489.
33 Moshfegh, AJ, Rhodes, DG, Baer, DJ, et al. (2008) The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 324332.
34 Shai, I, Rosner, BA, Shahar, DR, et al. (2005) Dietary evaluation and attenuation of relative risk: multiple comparisons between blood and urinary biomarkers, food frequency, and 24-hour recall questionnaires: the DEARR study. J Nutr 135, 573579.
35 Slimani, N, Bingham, S, Runswick, S, et al. (2003) Group level validation of protein intakes estimated by 24-hour diet recall and dietary questionnaires against 24-hour urinary nitrogen in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12, 784795.
36 Freedman, LS, Commins, JM, Moler, JE, et al. (2014) Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Am J Epidemiol 180, 172188.
37 Novotny, JA, Rumpler, WV, Riddick, H, et al. (2003) Personality characteristics as predictors of underreporting of energy intake on 24-hour dietary recall interviews. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 11461151.
38 Johnson, RK, Goran, MI & Poehlman, ET (1994) Correlates of over- and underreporting of energy intake in healthy older men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 59, 12861290.
39 Klovning, A, Sandvik, H & Hunskaar, S (2009) Web-based survey attracted age-biased sample with more severe illness than paper-based survey. J Clin Epidemiol 62, 10681074.
40 Bazelmans, C, Matthys, C, De, HS, et al. (2007) Predictors of misreporting in an elderly population: the ‘Quality of life after 65’ study. Public Health Nutr 10, 185191.
41 Yannakoulia, M, Tyrovolas, S, Pounis, G, et al. (2011) Correlates of low dietary energy reporting in free-living elderly: the MEDIS study. Maturitas 69, 6368.
42 Beckmann, M, Lloyd, AJ, Haldar, S, et al. (2013) Dietary exposure biomarker-lead discovery based on metabolomics analysis of urine samples. Proc Nutr Soc 72, 352361.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Lassale supplementary material
Lassale supplementary material 1

 Word (56 KB)
56 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed