Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:45:01.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON 𝒯-NONCOSINGULAR MODULES

Part of: Modules, bimodules and ideals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2009

DERYA KESKIN TÜTÜNCÜ  and
RACHID TRIBAK
DERYA KESKIN TÜTÜNCÜ*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Hacettepe University, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey (email: keskin@hacettepe.edu.tr)
RACHID TRIBAK
Affiliation:
Département de Mathématiques, Faculté des Sciences de Tétouan, B.P. 21.21, Tétouan, Morocco (email: tribak12@yahoo.com)
*
✉For correspondence; e-mail: keskin@hacettepe.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we introduce 𝒯-noncosingular modules. Rings for which all right modules are𝒯-noncosingular are shown to be precisely those for which every simple right module is injective. Moreover, for any ring R we show that the right R-module R is 𝒯-noncosingular precisely when R has zero Jacobson radical. We also study the 𝒯-noncosingular condition in association with (strongly) FI-lifting modules.

Keywords

𝒯-noncosingular module(strongly) FI-lifting module

MSC classification

Secondary: 16D10: General module theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 462 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2009

References

[1]Birkenmeier, G. F., Müller, B. J. and Rizvi, S. T., ‘Modules in which every fully invariant submodule is essential in a direct summand’, Comm. Algebra 30(3) (2002), 1395–1415.Google Scholar
[2]Clark, J., Lomp, C., Vanaja, N. and Wisbauer, R., ‘Lifting modules’, in: Supplements and Projectivity in Module Theory, Frontiers in Mathematics (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2006).Google Scholar
[3]Ganesan, L. and Vanaja, N., ‘Modules for which every submodule has a unique coclosure’, Comm. Algebra 30(5) (2002), 2355–2377.Google Scholar
[4]Inoue, T., ‘Sum of hollow modules’, Osaka J. Math. 20 (1983), 331–336.Google Scholar
[5]Keskin, D., ‘Discrete and quasi-discrete modules’, Comm. Algebra 30(11) (2002), 5273–5282.Google Scholar
[6]Kosan, T., ‘The lifting condition and fully invariant submodules’, East–West J. Math. 7(1) (2005), 99–106.Google Scholar
[7]Mohamed, S. H. and Müller, B. J., Continuous and Discrete Modules, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 147 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).Google Scholar
[8]Rizvi, S. T. and Roman, C. S., ‘On 𝒦-nonsingular modules and applications’, Comm. Algebra 35 (2007), 1–22.Google Scholar
[9]Sharpe, D. W. and Vamos, P., Injective Modules (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1972).Google Scholar
[10]Talebi, Y. and Vanaja, N., ‘Torsion theory cogenerated by M-small modules’, Comm. Algebra 30(3) (2002), 1449–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Wisbauer, R., Foundations of Module and Ring Theory (Gordon and Breach, Philadelphia, PA, 1991).Google Scholar
[12]Zöschinger, H., ‘Komplementierte Moduln über Dedekindringen’, J. Algebra 29 (1974), 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar