Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
Despite their period from the tenth to the twelfth century, at the height of the Middle Ages; despite their position in Egypt, at the centre of the civilization of the Near and Middle East; and despite their prominence as the third Caliphate of Islam, the Fāṭimids lack a satisfactory modern history of their dynasty. This is partly because of the length of their life, which covers the histories of so many hundreds of years; partly because of the span of their empire from North Africa to Egypt and Syria, stretching across the histories of so many regions; and finally because, at the level of Islam itself, their empire was divided between their dawla or state and their daՙwa or doctrine. The doctrine, which focused on the Fāṭimid Imām as the quṭb or pole of faith, gave the dynasty its peculiar strength and endurance. The failure of that doctrine to supersede the Islam of the schools, however, left the Fāṭimids increasingly isolated and ultimately vulnerable. Standing outside the mainstream of Islamic tradition, the dynasty's own version of its history was disregarded. Instead, its components passed out of their original context to be incorporated into the regional or universal histories of subsequent authors. Maqrīzī was alone in compiling his Ittiՙāẓ al-ḥunafā' as a history of the dynasty in Egypt, introduced by a miscellany of information on its origins and previous career.
1 Wüstenfeld, F., Geschichte der Fatimiden Chalifen (Gottingen, 1881).Google Scholar
2 cf. Stern, S. M., Studies in early Ismāՙ īlism (Jerusalem and Leiden), 1983Google Scholar, and more particularly Madelung, W., ‘Fatimiden und Bahrainqarmaten’, Der Islam, xxxiv, 1959, 34–88Google Scholar, and ‘Das Imamat in der miner früher ismailitischen Lehre’, Der Islam, xxxvii, 1961, 43–135.Google Scholar
3 Wiesbaden, 1978.
4 al-Dīn, Idrīs ՙImād, ՙUyūn al-akhbār wa funūn al-āthār, vols. 4–6 (ed. Ghalib, M., Beirut, 1973–1978)Google Scholar; vol. 5 Ta'rīkh al-khulafā dawla al-fāṭimiyya bi 'l-Maghrib (ed. Dachraoui, F., Tunis, 1981)Google Scholar; Ta'rīkh al-khulafā’ al-fāṭimiyyīn bi 'l-Maghrib (ed. Yalaoui, M., Beirut, 1985).Google Scholar
5 Halm, H., Das Reich des Mahdi: der Aufsteig der Fatimiden (Munich, 1991).Google Scholar
6 BSOAS, LVII, 1, 1994, 25–39.Google Scholar
7 Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1969, 161–70.
8 Reich des Mahdi, 13.
9 Reich des Mahdi, 285–6. Ironically, the story has been omitted(?) from the ՙUyūn, and is found only in the Egyptian sources: al-Maqrīzī, , Ittiՙāẓ al-hunafā', 3 vols. (Cairo, 1967–1973), i, 88–89.Google Scholar
10 For this doctrine of the Mahdi, cf. Brett, ‘The Mīm, the ՙAyn and the making of Ismā ՙīlism’, cited above, n. 6.
11 Reich des Mahdi, 276–7.
12 Sīrat al-Ustādh Jawdhar (ed. Husayn, M. K. and Shaՙirah, M. A.-H., Cairo, 1954), 30–41Google Scholar; transl. Canard, M., Vie de l'Ustadh Jaudhar (Algiers, 1958), 53–57.Google Scholar
13 Ta'rīkh al-khulafā', 338 ff.
14 al-Nuՙmān, Al-Qāḍī, al-Majālis via 'l-musāyarāt (ed. el-Feki, H., Chabbouh, I. and el-Yalaoui, M., Tunis, 1978), 448Google Scholar. Cf. Vie de l'Ustadh Jaudhar, 56, n. 40.
15 al-Nuՙmān, Al-Qāḍī, Iftitāḥ al-daՙwa wa ibtidā' al-dawla (ed. al-Qāḍī, W., Beirut, 1970; F. Dachraoui, Tunis, 1975), 333Google Scholar: ‘When the Qā'im saw that the time of the Dajjāl's destruction was approaching, he instructed and commanded, ՙahida ilā … wa amara, the Imam al-Manṣūr to combat him.’
16 cf. M. Brett, ‘The Mīm, the ‘Ayn’, see esp. pp. 33–4.
17 cf. Dachraoui, F., Le califat fatimide au Maghreb 296–362/909–73 (Tunis, 1981), 297–298.Google Scholar
18 Reich des Mahdi, 330.
19 cf. transl. Fyzee, A. A. A., The Book of Faith (Bombay, 1974)Google Scholar, a translation from the Daՙā'im of the section on the Imāmate.
20 Crone, P. and Hinds, M., God's Caliph (Cambridge, 1986), 99–103, 108, n. 76Google Scholar; cf. pp. 80–93.
21 Reich des Mahdi, 330; the characterization of such an Ismāՙīlī school is naturally complicated by the division of the sect into Nizārīs and Ṭayyibīs: cf. D. Hinchcliffe, review of Fyzee, , Compendium, BSOAS, XXXIII, 3, 1970, 626–627.Google Scholar
22 Fyzee, A. A., A compendium of Fatimid law (Simla, 1969), xlviii–1.Google Scholar
23 Daftary, F., The Ismāՙīlīs: their history and doctrines (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar; for the Ṭayyibīs on this point see esp. pp. 317–18. The legal implications of the Nizārī doctrine of qiyāma are not discussed; but see e.g. pp. 469, 477–8, 491, 516, 526, 528–32.
24 Fyzee, , Compendium, xxiii–iv.Google Scholar
25 cf. Halm, , Reich des Mahdi, 328.Google Scholar
26 Fyzee, Compendium, xxviii; cf. Poonawala, I. K., Biobibliography of Ismāՙīlī literature (Malibu, 1977), 48 ff.Google Scholar
27 cf. Dachraoui, , Califat fatimide, 404–416.Google Scholar
28 Reich des Mahdi, 331. Cf. Brunschvig, R., ‘Fiqh fatimide et histoire de l'Ifrīqiya’, in Marçais, G., Méḷanges d'histoire et d'archéologie de l'Occident musulman (Algiers, 1958), II, 13–20Google Scholar, and in idem, Études d'Islamologie (Paris, 1976), I, 63–70.Google Scholar
29 Al-Qāḍī al-Nuՙmān, Iftitāh, ed. Dachraoui, 3–7.
30 al-Nuՙmān, Al-Qāḍī, Al-Urjūzat al-mukhtārah (ed. Poonawala, I. K., Montreal, 1970)Google Scholar; cf. Brett, ‘The Mīm, the ‘Ayn’, 35.
31 cf. Hamdani, A. and de Blois, F., ‘A re-examination of al-Mahdī's letter to the Yemen’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1983, 173–207Google Scholar; cf. Brett, ‘The Mīm, the ՙAyn’, 31.
32 S. M. Stem, ‘The early Ismāՙīlī missionaries in North-West Persia and in Khurasan and Transoxania’, and ‘Heterodox Ismāՙīlism at the time of al-Muՙizz’, Studies in early Ismāՙīlism, Part 2, chs. iii, v.
33 Madelung, , ‘Imamat’, 86–101.Google Scholar
34 cf. de Blois, F., ‘The Abū Saՙīdīs or so-called “Qarmaṭians” of Bahrayn’, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, xvi, 1986, 13–21.Google Scholar
35 Halm, , Reich, 336–337.Google Scholar
36 Walker, Paul E., Early philosophical Shiism: the Ismaili Neoplatonism of Abū Ya'qūb al-Sijistānī (Cambridge, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; The wellsprings of wisdom: a study of Abū Ya'qūb al-Sijistānī's Kitāb al-yanābīՙ (Salt Lake City, 1994).
37 Early philosophical Shiism, 35–8, 77–8.
38 ibid., 92, 123.
39 ibid., 123, 142.
40 ibid., 152–3.
41 ibid., 47, 49, 89.
42 ibid., 109–11, 119. Cf. Calderini, S., ‘ՙĀlam al-dīn in Ismāՙīlism: world of obedience or world of immobility?’, BSOAS, LVI, 1, 1993, 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43 ibid., 141.
44 cf. Wansbrough, J., ‘Arabic rhetoric and Qur'ānic exegesis’, BSOAS, XXXI, 3, 1968, 469–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Majāz al-qur'an: periphrastic exegesis’, BSOAS, XXXIII, 2, 1970, 247–66; and Quranic studies, (Oxford, 1977).
45 Early philosophical Shiism, 125; Wansbrough, ‘Majāz al-qur'ān’, 266.
46 Early philosophical Shiism, 129.
47 ibid., 127–8.
48 ibid., 132.
49 ibid., 127.
50 ibid., 20–1.
51 ibid., 18–19, 28–9, 163, nn. 58, 59.
52 cf. Brett, ‘The Mīm, the ‘Ayn’, 29.
53 ibid., 39.
54 Early philosophical Shiism, 9–11.
55 al-Mulk, Niẓām, The Book of Government or Rules for Kings (transl. Darke, H., London, 1960), ch. xlvi, 213–238.Google Scholar
56 Stern, ‘Early Ismāՙīli missionaries’, Studies, 222–2.
57 Book of Government, 218–24. For the bare story, cf. Stern, ibid., 219–20.
58 cf. Walker, , Early philosophical Shiism, 51–60.Google Scholar
59 see above, at n. 25.
60 Walker, , Early philosophical Shiism, 140–141.Google Scholar
61 ibid., 20–1.
62 ibid., 17–8, from Stern, , ‘Early Ismāՙīlī missionaries’, Studies in early Ismāՙīlism, 221, 228.Google Scholar
63 ibid., 23.
64 cf. Stern, S., ‘Cairo as the centre of the Ismāՙīlī movement’, Studies in early Ismāՙīlism, 234–253Google Scholar; Gottheil, R., ‘A distinguished family of Fatimide Cadis (Al-Nuՙmān) in the tenth century’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, XXVII, 1906, 217–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65 Al-Shahrastānī, , Kitāb al-milal wa 'l-niḥal (Cairo, 1968), I, 191–198Google Scholar; Book I, ‘Muslim sects’, transl. Kazi, A. K. and Flynn, J. G., Muslim sects and divisions (London, 1984), 163–170Google Scholar; transl. Gimaret, D. and Monnot, G., Livre des religions et des sectes, I (Louvain, 1986), 550–565.Google Scholar
66 see above, at n. 51.
67 see above, at n. 22.
68 Wansbrough, J., The sectarian milieu (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar
69 Halm, H., Shiism (Edinburgh, 1991).Google Scholar
70 Crone, and Hinds, , God's Caliph, 99 ff.Google Scholar
71 Kohlberg, E., ‘From Imāmiyya to Ithnā-‘ashariyya’, BSOAS, XXXIX, 3, 1976, 521–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72 see above, n. 3; cf. Brett, ‘The Mīm, the ‘Ayn’.
73 cf. Walker, , Early philosophical Shiism, 128, 131–2.Google Scholar
74 ibid., 146 ff.
75 Oxford, 1977.
76 Netton, I. R., Allāh transcendent (London and New York, 1989), 203.Google Scholar
77 ibid., 234–43.
78 cf. Hodgson, M. G. S., ‘How did the early Shīՙa become sectarian’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, LXXXV, 1955, 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, art. ‘Ghulāt’, Encyclopaedia of Islam (2nd ed.).
79 Halm, , Kosmologie, 143–168Google Scholar; cf. Brett, , ‘The Mīm, the ‘Ayn’, 26–27, 39Google Scholar. The sectarian consequences of such doctrines are reviewed by Moosa, M., Extremist Shiites: the Ghulāt sects (Syracuse, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
80 ‘On recomposing the Islamic history of North Africa’, 168.
81 cf. Brett, M., ‘The unification of North Africa by Islam in the seventh to thirteenth centuries’, Morocco, Occasional Papers No. 1, 1994, 3–12.Google Scholar
82 Khaldūn, Ibn, The Muqaddimah, transl. Rosenthal, F., 3 vols. (2nd ed., New York, 1967), I, 305–306.Google Scholar
