Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-s4m2s Total loading time: 0.22 Render date: 2021-10-20T13:32:11.858Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Structure, use, and syntactic ecology in language obsolescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

David Adger*
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London

Abstract

Nancy Dorian's foundational work on the loss of Gaelic in the East Sutherland communities continues to provide important insights into the nature of the process of language change in situations of obsolescence. In this article I look at a subset of Dorian's data from the perspective of current syntactic theory, and argue that the connected loss of such apparently different constructions as objects of non-finite verbs, inalienable possessive structures, and a range of passives, and the concomitant restructuring of the grammar, all follow from the interaction between a reduction in agreement features on a functional head and the broad syntactic ecology of the language. This approach makes sense of why these apparently disparate constructions all undergo the particular kinds of change that are seen, changes which are mysterious from the perspective that an obsolescing language should alter to become more like the dominant language (in this case English) which is replacing it.

Résumé

Le travail fondamental de Nancy Dorian sur la perte du gaélique dans les communautés de East Sutherland continue de fournir des informations importantes sur la nature du processus de changement linguistique dans les situations d'obsolescence. Dans cet article, j'examine un sous-ensemble des données de Dorian à la lumière de la théorie syntaxique actuelle et soutiens que la perte connexe de constructions pourtant différentes, comme les objets de verbes non tensés, les structures possessives inaliénables et une gamme de constructions passives, et la restructuration concomitante de la grammaire, découlent de l'interaction entre une réduction des caractéristiques d'accord sur une tête fonctionnelle et l’écologie syntaxique de la langue de manière plus générale. Cette approche permet de comprendre pourquoi ces constructions en apparence hétérogènes subissent toutes les changements particuliers qui ont été observés, et qui paraissent mystérieux si l'on croit qu'une langue en voie d'obsolescence devrait changer de manière à ressembler davantage à la langue dominante (ici l'anglais), qui est en train de la remplacer.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A version of this article was presented at the Queen Mary Linguistics Department's Linglunch on 7th October 2015. Many thanks to all the participants for their comments and questions. Especial thanks to Devyani Sharma for very speedy comments on a rather drafty draft. Many thanks also to the audience of NWAV 44 at the University of Toronto for comments and feedback, to two anonymous reviewers for the Canadian Journal of Linguistics, and to the editors of this issue.

References

Adger, David. 2000. VSO clause structure and morphological feature checking. In Syntactic categories, ed. Borsley, Robert, 79100. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Adger, David. 2010. The syntax of Scottish Gaelic. In The Edinburgh Companion to the Scottish Gaelic language, ed. Watson, Moray and MacLeod, Michele, 304349. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Adger, David. 2013. A syntax of substance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris. 1995. Possessive descriptions. Stanford University: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. 1973. Grammatical change in a dying dialect. Language 49(2): 413438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. 1978. East Sutherland Gaelic. Dublin: Dublin Institue for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. 1981. Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. 1989. Introduction. In Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death, ed. Dorian, Nancy, 110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L. and McCloskey, James. 1984. On the syntax of person-number inflection in Modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1(4): 487533.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1989. Facets of Romance past participle agreement. In Dialect variation and the theory of grammar, ed. Benincà, Paola, 85104. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1992. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure . Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1994. Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1993. Predication in Caribbean English creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles. 2005. On productivity. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5: 333370.Google Scholar
3
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Structure, use, and syntactic ecology in language obsolescence
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Structure, use, and syntactic ecology in language obsolescence
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Structure, use, and syntactic ecology in language obsolescence
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *