Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Northern Iroquoian nominalizer and lexical categories

  • Michael Barrie (a1) and Sihun Jung (a1)

Abstract

In Northern Iroquoian languages, a nominalizer (nlzr) is typically required to transform a verb into a noun, either for noun incorporation or to create a full DP. In some cases, the nominalizer is required only for noun incorporation and not for the formation of a DP. Interestingly, the converse is never found. That is, there are no lexical roots that require the nominalizer for the formation of a DP, but not for noun incorporation. With this asymmetry in mind, we examine the categorial properties of roots in Northern Iroquoian. We discuss three common theories of the categorization of roots: (i) the traditional theory, in which all roots are specified as nouns or verbs (or adjectives for languages that have this category), (ii) the Bare Root Hypothesis, in which all roots are acategorial, and (iii), the Roots as Nouns Hypothesis, in which all roots are nouns. We show that the Northern Iroquoian facts are not amenable to any of these theories. We propose instead that some roots in Northern Iroquoian are categorially specified (some as nouns, some as verbs), while others are truly bare.

Résumé

Dans les langues iroquoiennes du nord, un nominalisateur (nlzr) est généralement requis pour transformer un verbe en un nom, que ce soit pour l'incorporation nominale, ou pour créer un DP complet. Dans certains cas, le nominalisateur est nécessaire seulement pour l'incorporation nominale et est absent lors de la formation d'un DP complet. Le cas inverse ne s'observe pas, c'est-à-dire qu'il n'existe pas dans le lexique des radicaux qui nécessitent un nominalisateur pour la formation d'un DP, mais qui n'en nécessitent pas pour l'incorporation nominale. C'est en partant de cette asymétrie que nous abordons le problème de la nature des radicaux dans l'iroquoien du nord. Nous considérons trois théories répandues sur le sujet de la catégorisation des radicaux : (i) la théorie traditionnelle, dans laquelle tous les radicaux sont spécifiés, soit en tant que nom, soit en tant que verbe (ou en tant qu'adjectif pour les langues avec cette catégorie), (ii) l'hypothèse des radicaux nus, dans laquelle tous les radicaux sont analysés comme étant dépourvus de catégorie et (iii), l'hypothèse des radicaux en tant que noms, une théorie dans laquelle tous les radicaux sont des noms. Nous montrons que les faits observés dans l'iroquoien du nord ont du mal à trouver une explication au sein de chacune de ces théories. Nous proposons plutôt qu'il existe certains radicaux dans ces langues qui ont une catégorie assignée – soit nom, soit verbe – tandis que d'autres sont véritablement nus, et donc n'ont pas de catégorie grammaticale inhérente.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All

We wish to thank the audience at WSCLA23 for helpful feedback and suggestions. All errors are our own. This work was supported by the Global Research Network program through the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017S1A2A2039972).

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Abbott, Clifford. 2000. Oneida. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Baker, Mark C. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3): 373416.
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baker, Mark C. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barrie, Michael. 2015. A grammar of Onondaga. Berlin: Lincom.
Barrie, Michael, and Mathieu, Eric. 2016. Noun incorporation and phrasal movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34(1): 151.
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Studies in Generative Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense: Volume 1: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Caramazza, Alfonso, and Shapiro, Kevin. 2004. Language categories in the brain: Evidence from aphasia, 1538. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chafe, Wallace. 2012. Are adjectives universal? The case of Northern Iroquoian. Linguistic Typology 16(1): 139.
Chafe, Wallace. 2014. A grammar of the Seneca language. Oakland: University of California Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. Jacobs, Roderick and Rosenbaum, Peter, 184221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
Chomsky, Noam, and Lasnik, Howard. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8(3): 425504.
Chung, Sandra. 2012. Are lexical categories universal? The view from Chamorro. Theoretical Linguistics 38(1–2): 156. doi: 10.1515/tl-2012-0001.
Compton, Richard. 2013. Word-internal XPs and right-headedness in Inuit. Paper presented at WCCFL 31, Arizona State University.
Dyck, Carrie, Froman, Frances, Keye, Alfred J., and Keye, Lottie. 2014. LIN 6050 - Structure of Cayuga: Course package. Memorial University of Newfoundland and Woodland Cultural Centre.
Fabb, Nigel. 1988. English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 527539.
Froman, Frances, Keye, Alfred J., Keye, Lottie, and Dyck, Carrie. 2002. English-Cayuga/Cayuga-English dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hale, Kenneth, and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi. 2009. Compounding in Distributed Morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, ed. Lieber, Rochelle and Štekauer, Pavol, 129144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haugen, Jason D., and Siddiqi, Daniel. 2013. Roots and the derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 44(3): 493517. doi: 10.1162/LING_ a_ 00136.
Johns, Alana. 2007. Restricting noun incorporation: root movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(3): 535576.
Julian, Charles. 2010. A History of the Iroquoian Languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Manitoba.
Kayne, Richard. 2009. Antisymmetry and the lexicon. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8(1): 131.
Koenig, Jean-Pierre, and Michelson, Karin. 2010. Argument structure of Oneida kinship terms. International Journal of American Linguistics 76(2): 169205.
Lounsbury, Floyd G. 1949. Iroquoian morphology. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
Lounsbury, Floyd G. 1953. Oneida verb morphology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 201225.
Marantz, Alec. 2001. Words. Paper presented at the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, University of Southern California.
Michelson, Karin. 2016. Iroquoian languages. Oxford Bibliographies Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/OBO/9780199772810-0023.
Michelson, Karin, and Doxtator, Mercy. 2002. Oneida-English/English-Oneida dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Michelson, Karin, Kennedy, Norma, and Doxtator, Mercy. 2016. Glimpses of Oneida life. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Mithun, Marianne. 1979. Iroquoian. In The languages of Native America: A historical and comparative assessment, ed. Campbell, Lyle and Mithun, Marianne, 133212. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60(4): 847894.
Mithun, Marianne. 2000. Noun and verb in Iroquoian languages: Multicategorisation from multiple criteria. In Approaches to the typology of word classes, ed. Vogel, Petra M. and Comrie, Bernard, 397420. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mithun, Marianne, and Henry, Reginald. 1984. Wadęwayę́stanih: A Cayuga teaching grammar. Brantford, ON: Woodland Cultural Center.
Moulton, Keir. 2014. Simple event nominalizations: Roots and their interpretation. In Cross-linguistic investigations of nominalization patterns, ed. Paul, Ileana, 119144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Panagiotidis, E. Phoevos. 2011. Categorial features and categorizers. The Linguistic Review 28(3): 365386. doi: 10.1515/tlir.2011.010.
Sato, Yosuke. 2010. Complex phrase structures within morphological words: Evidence from English and Indonesian. Lingua 120(2): 379407.
Wiltschko, Martina. 2005. The syntax of precategorial roots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas, ed. Armoskaite, Solveiga and Thompson, James J.. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.
Woodbury, Hanni. 1975a. Noun incorporation in Onondaga. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
Woodbury, Hanni. 1975b. Onondaga noun incorporation: Some notes on the interdependence of syntax and semantics. International Journal of American Linguistics 41(1): 1020.
Woodbury, Hanni. 2003. Onondaga-English/English-Onondaga dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Woodbury, Hanni. 2018. A reference grammar of the Onondaga language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Keywords

The Northern Iroquoian nominalizer and lexical categories

  • Michael Barrie (a1) and Sihun Jung (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed