Skip to main content
×
Home

Three incompatible hypotheses: evidence from Blackfoot 1

  • Donald G. Frantz (a1)
Abstract

Given the present state of transformational grammar theory, it is virtually impossible to provide convincing support for, or (and this, of course, is more serious) evidence against, any single hypothesis. Between 1957 and 1965, revisions of the theory and new hypotheses were generally proposed one or two at a time and tested within the otherwise widely accepted theoretical framework (the ‘paradigm’: Kuhn 1962). However, in recent years just about everything but the need for transformations to pair more abstract objects with actual and/or potential linguistic objects has been called into question or affected somehow by new hypotheses. Consequently, linguists must realize that any evidence they attempt to marshal for or against a particular hypothesis can be refuted or circumvented by at least one combination of other apparently unrelated popular hypotheses (abetted by the excessive power of transformational rules: Peters 1970).

Copyright
References
Hide All
Braithwaite Richard Bevan 1953 Scientific explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953.
Bresnan Joan 1971 Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Language 47.47257 (1971).
Chomsky Noam 1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1965.
Chomsky Noam 1970 Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. Mimeo (Indiana University Linguistics Club).
Frantz Donald G. 1966 Person indexing in Blackfoot. IJAL 32.3250 (1966).
Frantz Donald G. 1970 Toward a generative grammar of Blackfoot. Ph.D. dissertation, Alberta. (To be published in the series Publications in Linguistics and Related Fields, Santa Ana: SIL.)
Grimes Joseph E. 1968 The thread of discourse. Ms. (ERIC document ED-019669).
Jackendoff Ray Saul 1969 Some rules of semantic interpretation for English. Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T.
Kuhn Thomas S. 1962 The structure of scientific revolutions. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Volume 2, Number 2; Second edition 1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCawley James D. 1968a Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language 4.4243 (1968).
McCawley James D. 1968b Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure. Papers from the fourth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 7180.
Permutter David M. 1971 Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
Peters Stanley 1970 Why there are many “universal” bases. Papers in Linguistics 2.227 (1970).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique
  • ISSN: 0008-4131
  • EISSN: 1710-1115
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-linguistics-revue-canadienne-de-linguistique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 16 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 11th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.