Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-mm7gn Total loading time: 0.343 Render date: 2022-08-14T15:41:55.480Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Electoral Participation in Municipal, Provincial and Federal Elections in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2006

M. Reza Nakhaie*
Affiliation:
University of Windsor
*
M. Reza Nakhaie, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, N9P 3P4; hakhaie@windsor.ca

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to highlight the importance of social relations or social capital for voting turnout at three levels of Canadian government, paying particular attention to social contexts, socio-demographics and socio-economic forces. The data source is the Public Use Microdata File from the National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participation, administered by Statistics Canada (2001). Results provide support for social capital theory. Those who donate to charities and/or volunteer have a stronger propensity to vote than their counterparts. Two other measures of social capital, social networks and participation in religious activities, are also related to turnout. However, their effects are comparatively modest. Among the social bases of social capital, community rootedness is an important predictor of turnout. Civic engagement or attentiveness to current affairs also significantly increases voter turnout at all levels of Canadian government. Finally, standard socio-economic and demographic predictors of political participation do show independent effects on turnout. However, with the exception of age, these predictors are not as consistent or as strong as social capital measures in explaining turnout. Theoretical and policy implications of the findings are discussed.

Résumé

Résumé

L'objectif de cette étude est de souligner l'importance des relations sociales ou « capital social » en ce qui concerne la participation aux élections municipales, provinciales et fédérales au Canada, en prêtant une attention particulière aux contextes sociaux et aux forces socio-démographiques et socio-économiques. Nos données proviennent du fichier de microdonnées à grande diffusion de l'Enquête nationale sur le don, le bénévolat et la participation, administré par Statistique Canada (2001). Les résultats vérifient la théorie du capital social. Les gens qui font des dons aux organismes de bienfaisance ou font du bénévolat ont une tendance plus marquée à voter que les autres. Deux autres mesures de capital social, l'appartenance à des réseaux sociaux et la participation à des activités religieuses, ont aussi une corrélation positive avec la participation électorale. Leur impact est cependant relativement limité. Parmi les composantes du capital social, l'enracinement dans la communauté est un indicateur important de participation. L'engagement dans la vie civique ou un intérêt marqué pour les affaires courantes augmentent aussi d'une façon significative la participation aux élections à tous les niveaux gouvernementaux. Finalement, il s'avère que les variables explicatives socio-économiques et démographiques standard de la participation politique ont des effets indépendants sur le vote. Toutefois, à l'exception de l'âge, ces variables ne sont ni aussi constantes ni aussi déterminantes que les mesures du capital social pour expliquer la participation. Nous discutons dans cet article les implications théoriques et politiques de nos conclusions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J.H. 1986. “Turnout in American National Elections.” Research in Micropolitics 1: 271301.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J.H. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 246278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, J.H. and Nelson, D.D.. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J.H. and Simon, D.M.. 1986. “Turnout in American National Elections.” Pp. 271301 in Long, S. (ed.), Research in Micropolitics, Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Germany, Italy, Mexico, England). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, Keith. 1987. “A Simultaneous Equation Model of Canadian Voting Behaviour.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 20(3): 553572Google Scholar
Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nadeau, R. and Nevitte, N.. 2002. Anatomy of a Liberal Victory: Making Sense of the Vote in the 2000 Canadian Election. Peterborough, ON: Broadview.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nevitte, N. and Nadeau, R.. 2004. “Where Does Turnout Decline Come From.” European Journal of Political Research 43: 221236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1983. “Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. Richardson, J.G.. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–58.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. and Aiken, L.. 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New Jersey: Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94: S95121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chui, Tina W.L., Curtis, James E. and Lambert, Ronald D.. 1991. “Immigrant Background and Political Participation: Examining Generational Patterns.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 16(4): 375396Google Scholar
Dolfsma, W. and Dannreuther, C.. 2003. “Subjects and Boundaries: Contesting Social Capital-based Policies.” Journal of Economic Issues 37(2): 405413.Google Scholar
Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duncan, O.D. and Stenbeck, M.. 1988. “Panels and Cohorts: Design and Model in the Study of Voting Turnout.” In Sociological Methodology, ed. Cogg, Clifford C.. Washington: American Sociological Association, pp. 135.Google Scholar
Eagles, Munroe and Erfle, Stephen. 1989. “Community Cohesion and Voter Turnout in English Parliamentary Constituencies.” British Journal of Political Science 19(1): 115125.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gray, M. and Caul, M.. 2000. “Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950–1997: The Effects of Declining Group Mobilization.” Comparative Politics Studies 33(9): 10911122.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1995. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, M. and Ecklands, B.. 1978. “Adult Voluntary Associations and Adolescent Socialization.” Sociological Quarterly 19: 481490.Google Scholar
Heath, A., Jowell, R. and Curtice, J.. 1991. Understanding Political Change. Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckelman, Jac. 1997. “Determining Who Voted in Historical Elections: An Aggregated Logit Approach.” Social Science Research 26: 121134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwel, J. and Putnam, R.. 1999. “Education and Social Capital.” NBER working paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemingway, J.L. 1999. “Leisure, Social Capital, and Democratic Citizenship.” Journal of Leisure Research 31(2): 150–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Paul and Northrup, D.. 2000. “Strengthening Canadian Democracy—The Views of Canadians.” Policy Matters 1(5): 1104.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and Post-modernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jackman, R.W. and Miller, R.A.. 1998. “Social Capital and Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 4773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janoski, T. and Wilson, J.. 1995. “Pathways to Voluntarism: Family Socialization and Status Attainment Models.” Social Forces 74: 271292.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. 2001. “Canadian elections at the Millenium.” Choices 6(6): 152.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. and Soroka, S.. 2001. “Social Capital in Multicultural Society: The Case of Canada.” In Social Capital and Participation in Everyday Life, eds. Dekker, P. and Uslaner, E.. London: Routledge, pp. 3044.Google Scholar
Kushner, Joseph, Siegel, David and Stanwick, H.. 1997. “Ontario Municipal Elections: Voting Trends and Determinants of Electoral Success in a Canadian Province.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 30(3): 539553.Google Scholar
Lapp, Miriam 1999. “Ethnic Group Leaders and the Mobilization of Voter Turnout: Evidence from Five Montreal Communities.” Canadian Ethnic Studies 31(2): 1742Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour 1990. Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of Canada and the United States. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Lyons, W. and Alexander, R. 2000. “A Tale of Two Electorates: Generational Replacement and Decline of Voting in Presidential Elections.” The Journal of Politics 62(4): 10141034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1980. “Disinterest, Disaffection, and Participation in Presidential Politics.” Political Behavior 2(1): 732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1992. “The Puzzle Transformed: Explaining Declining Turnout.” Political Behavior 14(1): 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, H. 2001a. “Civic Literacy in Comparative Context: Why Canadians Should be Concerned.” Policy Matters 2: 140.Google Scholar
Milner, H. 2001b. “Social Capital, Civic Literacy and Political Participation: Explaining Differences in Voter Turnout.” In Challenges to Democracy: Ideas, Involvement and Institutions, eds. Dowding, K., Hughes, J. and Margetts, H.. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, H. 2002. Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work. Hanover: University of New England PressGoogle Scholar
Mishler, W. 1979. Political Participation in Canada: Prospects for Democratic Citizenship. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Morrow, Virginia. 1999. “Conceptualising Social Capital in Relation to the Well-Being of Children and Young People: A Critical Review.” The Sociological Review 47 (4): 744765.Google Scholar
Norris, P. 1999. “Conclusions: The Growth of Critical Citizens and its Consequences.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, ed. Norris, P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–72.Google Scholar
Pammett, J. and LeDuc, L.. 2003. Explaining the Turnout Decline in Canadian Federal Elections. http://www.elections.ca./content.asp?section=loi&document=index&dir=tur/tud&lang=e&textonly=false (January 20, 2006).Google Scholar
Paquet, Bernard. 2002. Low Income Cutoffs from 1992 to 2001 and Low Income Measures from 1991 to 2000. Statistics Canada: Income Statistics Division, catalogue no. 75F000MIE–no. 005.Google Scholar
Pattie, C. and Johnston, R.. 1998. “Voter Turnout at the British General Election of 1992: Rational Choice, Social Standing or Political Efficacy?European Journal of Political Research 33: 263283.Google Scholar
Pattie, C.J. and Johnston, R.J.. 2001. “A Low Turnout Landslide: Abstention in the British General Election of 1997.” Political Studies 49: 286305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, C.J. and Johnston, R.J.. 2003. “Civic Literacy and Falling Electoral Turnout: The United Kingdom 1992–1997.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36(3): 579599.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela 1999. “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment.” American Journal of Sociology 105(1): 88127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pharr, Susan, Putnam, R. and Dalton, R.. 2000. “Trouble in the Advanced Democracies? A Quarter Century of Declining.” Journal of Democracy 11(2): 525.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro 1988. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. “The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life.” The American Prospect 4(13).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1995a. “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6: 6578.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1995b. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.” The 1995 Ithiel de Sola Pool Lecture. Political Science and Politics: 664683.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2001. “Social Capital.” ISUMA, Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2(1): 4151.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.W., Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R.. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Transitions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, L. and Rusk, R.G.. 1993. “Who are Nonvoters? Profiles from the 1990 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 721746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabucedo, J.M. and Cramer, D.. 1991. “Sociological and Psychological Predictors of Voting in Great Britain,Journal of Social Psychology 131: 647654.Google Scholar
Saxena, Nandini. 2003. Citizens' Dialogue Experience: Follow-up Survey Results. Ottawa: Canadian Research Networks. Public Involvement Network.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard and Elkins, David. 1974. “Regional Political Cultures in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 7: 397.Google Scholar
Squire, P., Wolfinger, R.E. and Glass, D.P.. 1987. “Residential Mobility and Voter Turnout.” The American Political Science Review 81(1): 4566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2001. National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participation. Public-use microdata file.Google Scholar
Straits, Bruce C. 1990. “The Social Context of Voter Turnout.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54(1): 6473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, J. L. and Transue, J.E.. 1999. “The Psychological Underpinnings of Democracy: A Selective Review of Research on Political Tolerance, Interpersonal Trust, and Social Capital.” Annual Review of Psychology 50: 625650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaddle, K. and Heath, A.. 1989. “Official and Reported Turnout in the British General Election of 1987.” British Journal of Political Science 19: 537551Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley, California. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timpone, R.J. 1998. “Ties that Bind: Measurement, Demographics, and Social Connectedness.” Political Behaviour 20(1): 5377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, A. 1945. Democracy in America, vol. 1. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Veenstra, G. and Lomas, J.. 1999. “Home is Where the Governing is: Social Capital and Regional Health Governance.” Health and Place 5: 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veenstra, G. 2000. “Social Capital, SES and Health: An Individual-Level Analysis.” Social Science and Medicine 50: 619629.Google Scholar
Veenstra, Gerry. 2001. “Social Capital and Health.” ISUMA, Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2(1): 7283.Google Scholar
Veenstra, Gerry. 2002. “Explicating Social Capital: Trust and Participation in the Civil Space.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 27(4): 547572.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equity: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wall, Ellen, Ferrazzi, Gabriele and Schryer, Frans. 1988. “Getting the Goods on Social Capital.” Rural Sociology 63(2): 300322.Google Scholar
Walters, William. 2000. “Social Capital and Political Sociology: Re-Imagining Politics?Sociology 36(2): 377397.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1997. “The Changing Character of Social Capital in the United States.” Working Paper. Princeton, NJ: Department of Sociology, Princeton University.Google Scholar
14
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Electoral Participation in Municipal, Provincial and Federal Elections in Canada
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Electoral Participation in Municipal, Provincial and Federal Elections in Canada
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Electoral Participation in Municipal, Provincial and Federal Elections in Canada
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *