Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:54:42.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Echange Exchange

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Robert Presthus
Affiliation:
York University
Richard Simeon
Affiliation:
Queen's University
David Braybrooke
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Echange/Exchange
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For another example, see “Mr. Meisel Stands on Guard: Nationalism and the Academic Elite,” Canadian Forum (November-December 1974). See also Cairns, Alan, “Alternative Styles in the Study of Canadian Politics,” this Journal (March 1974), 101.Google Scholar

2 Elites in the Policy Process (New York and London: Cambridge University Press 1974), 336–9, 423–6

3 Particular difficulty seems to have occurred because I analysed group behaviour in two different contexts, i.e. general, run-of-the-mill experience and a specific “case issue.” Substantial variation occurred in the two contexts, largely because the “case” involved matters of special salience to the groups concerned. Since this procedure hardly seems recondite and the relevant tables were typically labelled as either “case study issue” or “general,” Simeon's reaction again seems to reflect nationalistic nit-picking.

4 “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics,” American Political Science Review, 58 (June 1964), 373–4

1 Poel, Dale, Review of Presthus, The Dalhousie Review, LIV (Winter 1974), 794–9Google Scholar