Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T01:24:29.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ideas, Institutions and the Politics of Federalism and Territorial Redistribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2017

Daniel Béland  and
André Lecours
Daniel Béland
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan
André Lecours
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing on the work of Richard Simeon and using the cases of equalization in Canada and Belgium's social security system, this article shows how nationalist ideas combined with institutional management structures, government formation rules and the configuration of party systems to condition the territorial dynamics around these two programmes. In Canada, resentment against equalization in many provinces, often because it is perceived as accommodating Québécois nationalism, has translated only into moderate pressures on the programme because federal parties have largely stayed away from this divisive issue and federal executive discretion over the programme has meant that provinces cannot force change. In Belgium, pressures on social security have been more intense because the absence of pan-Belgian parties has given greater resonance to Flemish nationalist ideas within the political system.

Résumé

Cet article suit la recommandation mise de l'avant par Richard Simeon dans son article de 1976 intitulé “Studying Public Policy” en développant une explication idéationnelle et institutionnelle des pressions exercées sur les grands programmes de redistribution territoriale au Canada et en Belgique. En utilisant les cas de la péréquation au Canada et de la sécurité sociale en Belgique, l'article montre que les facteurs conditionnant les dynamiques territoriales autour de ces politiques sont les idées nationalistes, les règles concernant la formation des gouvernements et la structure des systèmes de partis. Au Canada, un ressentiment envers la péréquation existe dans certaines provinces en grande partie parce que le programme est perçu comme favorisant le Québec. Par contre, ce ressentiment ne s'est pas traduit par des pressions politiques intenses car les partis politiques fédéraux ne portent pas cette position et les provinces ne peuvent pas forcer une modification du programme. En Belgique, la pression sur la Sécurité Sociale issue du nationalisme flamand a une importance politique plus grande en raison de l'absence de partis politiques pan-belges.

Type
Simeon's “Studying Public Policy” 40 years on – A Symposium
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 681 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balthazar, Louis. 1986. Bilan du nationalisme au Québec. Montréal: Éditions de L'Hexagone.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Patrick A. 2004. “Alberta financing Que. tax cut,” Edmonton Journal, October 28, A19.Google Scholar
Béland, Daniel and Cox, Robert Henry, eds. 2011. Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Béland, Daniel and Cox, Robert Henry. 2016. “Ideas as coalition magnets: coalition building, policy entrepreneurs, and power relations.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 428–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, Daniel and Lecours, André. 2008. Nationalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Territorial Solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, Daniel and Lecours, André. 2011. “The Ideational Dimension of Federalism: The ‘Australian Model’ and the Politics of Equalization in Canada.” Australian Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, Daniel and Lecours, André. 2013. “Federalism, Nationalist Politics, and Social Policy: How Ideas and Institutions Shape Federal Dynamics.” In Federal Dynamics: Continuity, Change, and Varieties of Federalism, ed. Benz, Arthur and Broschek, Jörg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Béland, Daniel and Lecours, André. 2014. “Accommodation and the Politics of Fiscal Equalization in Multinational States: The Case of Canada.” Nations and Nationalism 20 (2): 337–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, Daniel and Waddan, Alex. 2015. “Breaking Down Ideas and Institutions: The Politics of Tax Policy in the USA and the UK.” Policy Studies 36 (2): 176–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Vandna and Coleman, William D.. 2003. “Ideas and Discourse: Reform and Resistance in the Canadian and German Health Systems.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (4): 715–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouteca, Nicolas, Devos, Carl and Mus, Manu. 2013. ‘The Future of Belgian Federalism as Seen Through the Eyes of the Social Partners: A Continuing Obstacle to Social Policy Decentralization?’ Regional & Federal Studies 23 (3): 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryden, P.E. 2009. “The Obligations of Federalism: Ontario and the Origins of Equalization.” In Framing Canadian Federalism: Historical Essays in Honour of John T. Saywell, ed. Anastakis, Dimitry and Bryden, P.E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, John L. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John L. and Pedersen, Ove K.. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Andrew. 2008. “PM Accused of Fanning Flames of Separatism.” The Toronto Star, December 5, http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2008/12/05/pm_accused_of_fanning_flames_of_separatism.html (June 24, 2016).Google Scholar
Chung, Andrew. 2010. “Quebec: A poor little rich province,” The Toronto Star, March 20, https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2010/03/20/quebec_a_poor_little_rich_province.html (June 24, 2016).Google Scholar
Coppi, David and Wyets, Ben. 2014. “Il faut scinder la sécurité sociale.” Le Soir (Brussels), April 25, http://www.lesoir.be/528618/article/actualite/belgique/elections-2014/2014-04-24/ben-weyts-n-va-il-faut-scinder-securite-sociale (June 224, 2016).Google Scholar
Corbella, Licia. 2012. “Quebec Students Need Lesson in Equalization.” Calgary Herald/Vancouver Sun, March 10.Google Scholar
Courchene, Thomas J. 1984. Equalization Payments: Past, Present and Future. Toronto: Ontario Economic Council.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert Henry. 2001. “The Social Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but Not in Germany.” World Politics 53: 463–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumont, Daniel, ed. 2015. “L'impact de la sixième réforme de l'Etat sur la sécurité sociale et le marché du travail: regards de juristes,” Revue belge de sécurité sociale 57 (2) : 173–464.Google Scholar
Eisen, Ben and Milke, Mark. 2010. The Real Have-Nots in Confederation: Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia. How Canada's Equalization Program Creates Generous Programs and Large Governments in Have-Not Provinces. Winnipeg: Frontier Centre for Public Policy.Google Scholar
Erk, Jan. 2003. “‘Wat We Self Doen, Doen We Beter’: Belgian Substate Nationalism, Congruence, and Public Policy.” Journal of Public Policy 23: 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O.. 1993. “Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework.” In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, ed. Goldstein, Judith and O. Keohane, Robert. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goossens, Jurgen and Cannoot, Pieter. 2015. “Belgian Federalism after the Sixth State Reform.” Perspectives on Federalism 7:2, 29–55. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2614384 (June 24, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1986. Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2011. “Ideas and the Construction of Interests.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, ed. Béland, Daniel and H. Cox, Robert. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holle, Peter. 2012. “Artificially Cheap Hydro Power, Your Equalization Dollars at Work.” National Post (Toronto), May 29.Google Scholar
Howlett, Karen and Carmichael, Kevin. 2008. “Struggling Ontario Joins Have-Not Ranks.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), November 4, http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/struggling-ontario-joins-have-not-ranks/article662588/ (June 24, 2016).Google Scholar
Ibbitson, John. 2004. “The More Things Stay the Same.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), October 27, A4.Google Scholar
Inwood, Gregory, Johns, Carolyn and O'Reilly, Patricia. 2011. Intergovernmental Policy Capacity in Canada: Inside the Worlds of Finance, Environment, Trade, and Health. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Alan M. 2009. How Do Ideas Matter? Mental Models and Attention in German Pension Politics. Comparative Political Studies 42 (2): 252–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorens, Yves. 2006. “Défédéralisation de la sécurité sociale en Belgique: l'exemple des soins de longue durée.” Lien social et politiques 56: 129–36.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Lecours, André, ed. 2005. New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecours, André and Béland, Daniel. 2010. “Federalism and Fiscal Policy: The Politics of Equalization in Canada.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40 (4): 569–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L'Idée Fédérale. “Rapport CROP-express Avril 2009.” http://ideefederale.ca/wp/?p=7 (June 24, 2016.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert C. 2002. “Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change.” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNevin, Alex S. 2004. Canadian Federal-Provincial Equalization Regime: An Assessment. Toronto: Canada Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Maioni, Antonia. 1998. Parting at the Crossroads: The Emergence of Health Insurance in the United States and Canada. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, Jal. 2011. “The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics: From ‘Whether’ to ‘How.’ ” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, ed. Béland, Daniel and Cox, Robert H.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milke, Mark. 2012. “We Help Fund Quebec's Lavish Social Programs.” Times Colonist (Victoria), June 7.Google Scholar
Milke, Mark and McMahon, Fred. 2012. “Some Inconvenient Facts about Equalization.” National Post (Toronto), May 28.Google Scholar
Milne, David. 1998. “Equalization and the Politics of Restraint.” In Equalization: Its Contribution to Canada's Fiscal and Economic Progress, ed. Boadway, Robin W. and Hobson, Paul A.R.. Kingston ON: John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy.Google Scholar
Morton, Ted, 2005. Equality or Asymmetry? Alberta at the Crossroads. Asymmetry Series. Kingston ON: Queen's University: School of Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Mouton, Olivier. 2014. “La N-VA propose une vision plus cohérente de la Belgique.” Le Vif/Express, January 1, http://www.levif.be/actualite/belgique/la-n-va-propose-une-vision-plus-coherente-de-la-belgique/article-normal-61881.html (June 24, 2016).Google Scholar
Padamsee, Tasleem. 2009. “Culture in Connection: Re-Contextualizing Ideational Processes in the Analysis of Policy Development.” Social Politics 16 (4): 413–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Craig. 2007. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parti québécois, La péréquation canadienne nous coûte 3,3 milliards par année, Québec, 2016. http://mon.pq.org/documents/monpq_56e6f069da35b.pdf (June 24, 2016).Google Scholar
Perry, David B. 1997. Financing the Canadian Federation, 1867–1995: Setting the Stage for Change. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Poirier, Johanne and Vansteenkiste, Steven. 2000. “Le débat sur la fédéralisation de la sécurité sociale en Belgique: Le miroir du vouloir-vivre ensemble?” Revue belge de sécurité sociale 2: 331–79.Google Scholar
Popelier, Patricia and Cantillon, Bea. 2013. “Bipolar Federalism and the Social Welfare State: A Case for Shared Competences.” Publius, 43 (4): 626–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuchamps, Min. 2013. “The Current Challenges on the Belgian Federalism and the Sixth Reform of the State.” In The Ways of Federalism in Western Countries and the Horizons of Territorial Autonomy in Spain, ed. Basaguren, Alberto López and San Epifanio, Leire Escajedo. vol 1. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Reman, Pierre and Feltesse, Patrick. 2011. “La sécurité sociale belge et le clivage communautaire.” In L’État de la Wallonie: portrait d'un pays et de ses habitants, ed. Germain, Marc and Robaye, René. Namur: Les éditions namuroises.Google Scholar
Resnick, Philip. 2000. The Politics of Resentment: British Columbia Regionalism and Canadian Unity. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Sauve, Robert. 2004. “Hardly Equal.” National Post (Toronto), April 16, A15.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2002. “Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment?” Comparative Political Studies 35 (2): 168–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2011. “Reconciling Ideas and Institutions through Discursive Institutionalism.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, ed. Béland, Daniel and Cox, Robert H.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard. 1972. Federal-Provincial Diplomacy: The Making of Recent Policy in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard. 1976. “Studying Public Policy.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 9 (4): 548–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simeon, Richard and Conway, Daniel-Patrick. 2001. “Federalism and the Management of Conflict in Multinational Societies.” In Multinational Democracies, ed. Gagnon, Alain-G. and Tully, James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard and Robinson, Ian. 1990. State, Society, and the Development of Canadian Federalism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Skogstad, Grace. 1998. “Ideas, Paradigms and Institutions: Agricultural Exceptionalism in the European Union and the United States.” Governance 11 (4): 463–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogstad, Grace, ed. 2011. Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism and Domestic Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Katherine. 2013. Beyond Evidence-Based Policy in Public Health: The Interplay of Ideas. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Théret, Bruno. 1999. “Regionalism and Federalism: A Comparative Analysis of the Regulation of Economic Tensions between Regions by Canadian and American Federal Intergovernmental Transfer Programmes.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23 (3): 479–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tissot, Pauline. 2011. “La Belgique en crise, an II.” L'Express (Montreal), June 10, http://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/monde/europe/la-belgique-en-crise-an-ii_985717.html (June 24, 2016).Google Scholar
Trudeau, Pierre. 1968. Federalism and the French Canadians. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Walsh, James I. 2000. “When Do Ideas Matter? Explaining the Successes and Failures of Thatcherite Ideas.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (4): 483–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Margaret. 1992. Politics and Jobs: The Boundaries of Employment Policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
White, Linda A. 2002. “Ideas and the Welfare State: Explaining Child Care Policy Development in Canada and the United States.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (6): 713–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wils, Lode. 1996. Histoire des nations belges. Ottignies, LLN: Quorum.Google Scholar
Blok, Vlaams. 2003. Een toekomst voor Vlaanderen [party platform], http://logocom.be/vlaamsblok/vlaamsblok.pdf (June 24, 2016).Google Scholar