Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 13
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Chirumbolo, Antonio Leone, Luigi and Desimoni, Marta 2016. The interpersonal roots of politics: Social value orientation, socio-political attitudes and prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 91, p. 144.

    Leader Maynard, Jonathan and Mildenberger, Matto 2016. Convergence and Divergence in the Study of Ideology: A Critical Review. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.

    Bell, Edward and Kandler, Christian 2015. The origins of party identification and its relationship to political orientations. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 83, p. 136.

    Fazekas, Zoltán and Littvay, Levente 2015. The Importance of Context in the Genetic Transmission of U.S. Party Identification. Political Psychology, Vol. 36, Issue. 4, p. 361.

    Kandler, Christian Bell, Edward Shikishima, Chizuru Yamagata, Shinji and Riemann, Rainer 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    Oskarsson, Sven Cesarini, David Dawes, Christopher T. Fowler, James H. Johannesson, Magnus Magnusson, Patrik K. E. and Teorell, Jan 2015. Linking Genes and Political Orientations: Testing the Cognitive Ability as Mediator Hypothesis. Political Psychology, Vol. 36, Issue. 6, p. 649.

    Hibbing, John R. Smith, Kevin B. and Alford, John R. 2014. Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 37, Issue. 03, p. 297.

    Bell, Edward Woodley, Michael A. Schermer, Julie Aitken and Vernon, Philip A. 2012. Politics and the General Factor of Personality. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 53, Issue. 5, p. 546.

    Petersen, Michael Bang Sznycer, Daniel Cosmides, Leda and Tooby, John 2012. Who Deserves Help? Evolutionary Psychology, Social Emotions, and Public Opinion about Welfare. Political Psychology, Vol. 33, Issue. 3, p. 395.

    Renner, Walter Kandler, Christian Bleidorn, Wiebke Riemann, Rainer Angleitner, Alois Spinath, Frank M. and Menschik-Bendele, Jutta 2012. Human values: Genetic and environmental effects on five lexically derived domains and their facets. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 52, Issue. 1, p. 89.

    Smith, Kevin Alford, John R. Hatemi, Peter K. Eaves, Lindon J. Funk, Carolyn and Hibbing, John R. 2012. Biology, Ideology, and Epistemology: How Do We Know Political Attitudes Are Inherited and Why Should We Care?. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 56, Issue. 1, p. 17.

    Tapscott, Jennifer L. Vernon, Philip A. and Veselka, Livia 2012. A Comparison of the Construct Validity of Two Alternative Approaches to the Assessment of Psychopathy in the Community. Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 94, Issue. 5, p. 541.

    Littvay, Levente 2011. Biology and Politics.

  • Canadian Journal of Political Science, Volume 42, Issue 4
  • December 2009, pp. 855-879

The Origins of Political Attitudes and Behaviours: An Analysis Using Twins

  • Edward Bell (a1), Julie Aitken Schermer (a2) and Philip A. Vernon (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 14 December 2009

Abstract. This article provides a behaviour genetic heritability analysis of several political issues, including social and economic conservatism, general interest in politics, attitudes toward the major Canadian federal parties, federal party identification and national vote choice. Substantial genetic effects were found for four of six political attitude scales, with heritability values ranging from 41 per cent to 73 per cent. Genetic effects are also reported for several individual items (including feelings toward the major federal parties, party identification and vote choice), with heritabilities from 33 per cent to 62 per cent. The implications of these results for conventional political analyses are explored. Also presented is a theoretical interpretation of political heritability that is derived from an evolutionary perspective which suggests that political personalities or temperaments have evolved that are analogous to the heritable personality structures proposed by psychologists.

Résumé. Cet article propose une analyse sur l'héritabilité de la génétique du comportement concernant plusieurs questions politiques, y compris le conservatisme social et économique, l'intérêt général pour la politique, les attitudes envers les principaux partis fédéraux canadiens, l'identification à un parti et le choix de vote au niveau national. Des effets génétiques notables ont été recensés pour quatre des échelles politiques d'attitude sur six, les taux d'héritabilité s'étendant de 41 pour cent à 73 pour cent. Des effets génétiques ont également été recensés pour plusieurs autres éléments étudiés (y compris les sentiments envers les principaux partis fédéraux, l'identification à un parti et le choix de vote), les taux d'héritabilité allant cette fois-ci de 33 pour cent à 62 pour cent. Cette étude explore l'incidence de ces résultats sur des analyses politiques conventionnelles. Il s'agit aussi d'une interprétation théorique de l'héritabilité politique dérivant d'une perspective évolutionnaire, qui suggère que les personnalités ou les tempéraments politiques ont évolué et que ces derniers sont analogues aux structures de personnalité transmissibles proposées par les psychologues.

Corresponding author
Edward Bell, Department of Sociology, Brescia University College (at The University of Western Ontario), 1285 Western Road, London ON N6G 1H2,
Julie Aitken Schermer, Management and Organizational Studies, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5C2,
Philip A. Vernon, Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5C2,
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

John R. Alford , Carolyn L. Funk and John R. Hibbing . 2008. “Beyond Liberals and Conservatives to Political Genotypes and Phenotypes.” Perspectives on Politics 6 (2): 321–28.

John R. Alford and John R. Hibbing . 2004. “The Origin of Politics: An Evolutionary Theory of Political Behaviour.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 707–23.

John R. Alford and John R. Hibbing . 2007b. “Personal, Interpersonal and Political Temperaments.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 614 (November): 196212.

Bernd Baldus . 2006. “Evolution, Agency and Sociology.” In Missing the Revolution: Darwinism for Social Scientists, ed. J.H. Barkow . New York: Oxford University Press.

Jerome H. Barkow 2006. “Introduction: Sometimes the Bus Does Wait.” In Missing the Revolution: Darwinism for Social Scientists, ed. J.H. Barkow . New York: Oxford University Press.

Marion Blute . 1997. “History versus Science: The Evolutionary Solution.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 22 (3): 345–64.

T.J. Bourchard and M. McGue . 2003. “Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences.” Journal of Neurobiology 54: 445.

T.J. Bourchard Jr., N. Segal , A. Tellegen , M. McGue , M. Keyes and R. Krueger . 2003. “Evidence for the construct validity and heritability of the Wilson-Patterson conservatism scale: a reared-apart twins study of social attitudes.” Personality and Individual Differences 34: 959–69.

Ira H. Carmen 2006. “Genetic Configurations of Political Phenomena: New Theories, New Methods.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 614 (November): 3455.

Christopher T. Dawes and J.H. Fowler . 2009. “Partisanship, Voting and the Dopamine D2 Receptor Gene.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 11571171.

Thomas Dietz , T.R. Burns and F.H. Buttel . 1990. “Evolutionary Theory in Sociology: An Examination of Current Thinking.” Sociological Forum 5 (2): 155–71.

L.J. Eaves , N. Martin , A. Heath , R. Schieken , J. Meyer , J. Silberg , M. Neale and L. Corey . 1997. “Age Changes in the Causes of Individual Differences in Conservatism.” Behaviour Genetics 27 (2): 121–24.

L.J. Eaves , A.C. Heath , N.G. Martin , H.H. Maes , M.C. Neale , K.S. Kendler , K.M. Kirk and L. Corey . 1999. “Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the Virginia 30,000 study twins and their relatives.” Twin Research 2: 6280.

N.T. Feather 1978. “Family resemblances in conservatism: Are daughters more similar to parents than sons are?Journal of Personality 46: 260–78.

James H. Fowler and C.T. Dawes . 2008. “Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout.” Journal of Politics 70 (3): 579–94.

Peter K. Hatemi , S.E. Medland , K.I. Morley , A.C. Heath and N.G. Martin . 2007. “The Genetics of Voting: An Australian Twin Study.” Behaviour Genetics 37: 435–48.

John R. Hibbing and John R. Alford . 2004. “Accepting Authoritative Decisions: Humans as Wary Co-operators.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 6276.

John R. Hibbing and Kevin B. Smith . 2007. “The Biology of Political Behaviour: An Introduction.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614 (November): 614.

John T. Jost , J. Glaser , A.W. Kruglanski and F.J. Sulloway . 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129 (3): 339–75.

V.O. Key 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–60. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Geoffrey C. Layman and Thomas M. Carsey . 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 786802.

John C. Loehlin 1993. “Nature, Nurture, and Conservatism in the Australian Twin Study.” Behaviour Genetics 23 (3): 287–90.

N.G. Martin , L.J. Eaves , A.C. Heath , R. Jardine , L.M. Feingold and H.J. Eysenck . 1986. “Transmission of social attitudes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 83 (June): 4364–68.

Douglas S. Massey 2000. “What I don't know about my field but wish I did.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 699701.

H. McClosky and J. Zaller . 1984. The American Ethos. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

K. McCourt , T.J. Bouchard Jr., D.T. Lykken , A. Tellegen and M. Keyes . 1999. “Authoritarianism revisited: genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together.” Personality and Individual Differences 27: 9851014.

H. Mirels and J. Garrett . 1971. “The Protestant ethic as a personality variable.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 36: 4044.

M. C. Neale and L.R. Cardon . 1992. Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families. Norwell MA: Kluwer.

Paul Nieuwbeerta . 1996. “The Democratic Class Struggle in Postwar Societies: Class Voting in Twenty Countries, 1945–1990.” Acta Sociologica 39: 345–83.

Rick Ogmundson . 1975. “Party Class Images and the Class Vote in Canada.” American Sociological Review 40: 506–12.

D.R. Oxley , K.B. Smith , J.R. Alford , M.V. Hibbing , J.L. Miller , M. Scalora , P.K. Hatemi and J.R. Hibbing . 2008. “Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits.” Science 321 (19): 1667–70.

Jon H. Pammett 1987. “Class Voting and Class Consciousness in Canada.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 24 (2): 269–90.

Matt Ridley . 2003. Nature via Nurture: Genes, Experience and What Makes Us Human. London: Fourth Estate.

Laura B. Stephenson , A. Kornberg and T.J. Scotto . 2004. “Slip, sliding away or le plus ca change … : Canadian and American partisanship in comparative perspective.” The American Review of Canadian Studies 34 (2): 283312.

John L Sullivan , A. Fried and M.G. Dietz . 1992. “Patriotism, Politics, and the Presidential Election of 1988.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 200–34.

K.R. Truett , L.J. Eaves , J.M. Meyer , A.C. Heath and N.G. Martin . 1992. “Religion and Education as Mediators of Attitudes: A Multivariate Analysis.” Behaviour Genetics 22 (1): 4362.

Pierre L. van den Berghe 1990. “Why Most Sociologists Don't (and Won't) Think Evolutionarily.” Sociological Forum 5 (2): 173–85.

P.A. Vernon , R.A. Martin , J.A. Schermer and A. Mackie . 2008. “A behavioural genetic investigation of humour styles and their correlations with the big five personality dimensions.” Personality and Individual Differences 44: 1116–25.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *