Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T04:30:53.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English Reformation: Product of King or Minister?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Joseph D. Ban
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Who was the prime mover in the English Reformation? Was it the sovereign, Henry VIII? Or was his minister, Thomas Cromwell, the originating force? According to G. R. Elton, Cromwell was the architect of English reform who spelled out the concept of national sovereignty, established royal supremacy over the church, set the locus of national sovereignty in Parliament, consolidated the national territory and reformed the central administration of government. Thus, Elton has credited Cromwell with the decisive role in creating the ecclesiastical revolution. J. J. Scarisbrick has sharply challenged Elton's thesis. His biography of Henry VIII, published in 1968, is a major contribution to the study of Tudor history. There Scarisbrick demonstrates that the king was committed to ecclesiastical reform well before Cromwell appeared on the political scene. Hence, there emerges a sharp conflict between two modern scholars regarding the role of Henry VIII in originating the reform of the English church.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 1972 , pp. 186 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1900

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Elton, G. R., England Under The Tudors (London, Methuen and Co., 1955).Google Scholar

2. Elton, G. R., “The King of Hearts,” The Historical Journal, XII, 1 (1969), 158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar; this is a review of Scarisbriek, J. J., Henry VIII (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).Google Scholar

3. Elton, G. R., England Under The Tudors (London: Methuen and Co., 1955), p. 127.Google Scholar

4. Ibid.

5. Pollard, A. F., Henry VIII, with an Introduction by Dickens, A. G. (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1966), p. xvi.Google Scholar

6. Elton, G. R., “King or Minister! The Man Behind the Henrician Reformation,” History, New Series, 39 (October, 1954), p. 220.Google Scholar

7. Ibid., 232.

8. Elton, G. R., Henry VIII, An Essay. In Revision (Historical Association Pamphlet, General Series, No. 51); (London: Boutledge and Kegan Paul, 1962), p. 16.Google Scholar

9. Ibid.

10. Ibid., p. 27.

11. Elton, , “King or Ministert”, 231.Google Scholar

12. Elton, , Essay In Revision, p. 21.Google Scholar

13. Scarisbrick, J. J., Henry VIII (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969), p. 287.Google Scholar

14. Ibid., p. 314.

15. Ibid., p. 309.

16. Elton, , England Under the Tudors, p. 132.Google Scholar

17. Scarisbrick, , Henry VIII, p. 313.Google Scholar

18. Bindoff, S. T., Tudor England (Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1950), p. 98.Google Scholar

19. Scarisbrick, , Henry VIII, p. 287.Google Scholar

20. Ibid., p. 246.

21. Ibid., p. 248.

22. Ibid., p. 248.

23. Ibid., p. 252.

24. Ibid., p. 251.

25. While the argument bears the name of the Swiss theologian, Thomas Erastus (1524–83), it was a viewpoint expressed by various authors, notable among whom was Marsiglio of Padua, d. 1342. Also see Dickens, A. G. and Carr, Dorothy, The Reformation in England to the Accession of Elizabeth I (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1968), p. 166.Google Scholar

26. 4 Blackstone Commentaries 103 quoted in Parmiter, Geoffrey De C., The King's Great Matter, A Study of Anglo-Papal Relations, 1527–1534 (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1967), p. 152.Google Scholar

27. Scarisbrick, J. J., “The Pardon of the Clergy, 1531,” Cambridge Historical Journal, XII (1956), 25.Google Scholar

28. Scarisbrick, , Henry VIII, p. 276.Google Scholar

29. Ibid., pp. 278–79.

30. Ibid., p. 279.

31. Ibid., p. 255.

32. Ibid., p. 288.

33. Ibid., p. 268.

34. Ibid., p. 289.

35. Ibid.

36. Ibid., p. 293.

37. Ibid., p. 294.

38. Ibid., p. 273.

39. Ibid., p. 303.

40. Ibid., p. 304.

41. Elton, , England Under the Tudors, p. 128.Google Scholar

42. Ibid., p. 161.

43. Ibid., p. 129.

44. Parmiter, p. 145.

45. Parker, T. M., “Was Cromwell a Machiavellian”, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, I (1950), 69.Google Scholar

46. Dickens, A. G., Thomas Cromwell and the English Reformation (New York: Harper and Row, 1969), p. 15.Google Scholar

47. Parmiter, p. 145.

48. Elton, , England Under The Tudors, p. 129.Google Scholar

49. Parmiter, p. 144.

50. Elton, , England Under The Tudor, p. 173.Google Scholar

51. Dickens, A. G., The English Reformation (New York: Schocken Books, 1964), p. 111.Google Scholar

52. Dickens and Carr, p. 55.

53. Elton, , “King or Minister?”, 229.Google Scholar

54. Scarisbrick, , Henry VIII, p. 267.Google Scholar

55. Parmiter, p. 221.

56. Elton, , England Under The Tudors, p. 129.Google Scholar

57. Scarisbrick, , Henry VIII, p. 265.Google Scholar

58. Ibid., p. 268.

59. Elton, , “King or Minister?”, 230.Google Scholar

60. Cooper, J. P., “The Supplication Against the Ordinaries Reconsidered,” English Historical Review, LXXVII (October, 1957), 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

61. Ibid., 617.

62. Ibid., 620.

63. Ibid., 638.

64. Ibid., 641.

65. Elton, , Essay In Revision, p. 24.Google Scholar

66. Ibid., p. 15.

67. Scarisbrick, , “The Pardon of the Clergy,” 29.Google Scholar

68. Elton, , “The King of Hearts,” 163.Google Scholar

69. Elton, , England Under The Tudors, p. 129.Google Scholar

70. Parmiter, pp. 220–81.