Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Does India Have History? Does History Have India?

  • Thomas R. Trautmann (a1)
Extract

It was the unanimous opinion of the early Orientalists of British India that India had no history, at least in the sense of historical writings. Like every consensus, it contained many variations of detail, as we shall see, but as the view of experts it was widely influential for a long time. For example, R. C. Majumdar gave a thoughtful version of this view at the beginning of the multivolume History and Culture of the Indian People (Majumdar 1951) by Indian scholars, published shortly after independence. But the consensus was eroded by the rise of what we may call the “colonial knowledge” paradigm, which asserted a close connection between European rule and European knowledge of India. It tended to discredit the old consensus and to lighten the specific gravity of Orientalist knowledge, simplifying it as an object of historical explanation. This development has cleared an opening, in recent decades, for a rush of new studies tending to create an opposing consensus, that India did have history of a kind, it being the task of scholars to explicate what kind, exactly, that was (for example, Pathak 1966; Warder 1972; Thapar 1992; Wagoner 1993; Ali, ed. 1999; Narayana Rao, Shulman, and Subrahmanyam 2001; Guha 2004; Mantena 2007). This in itself has been very much to the good, by reopening questions that had been closed by the old consensus. The old consensus itself, by contrast, was dismissed without much examination, and was attributed to colonial interest, cultural misunderstanding, or insufficient grasp of Indian languages and literatures. The old consensus now is seen as a simple ideological projection, easily explained and dismissed, with little complexity or interest for historical investigation. But this simplifying action of the prevailing paradigm renders invisible some of the very real effects of the old consensus, effects whose explanation can be very valuable to us. In order to gain the benefit it holds we have to take it seriously, trying both to explain it historically and to decide whether or in what way it is true.

Copyright
Corresponding author
ttraut@umich.edu
References
Hide All
Ali Daud, ed. 1999. Invoking the Past: The Uses of History in South Asia. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Arendt Hannah. 1944. Race-Thinking before Racism. Review of Politics 6, 1: 3673.
Berossus . 1978. The Babylonaiaca of Berossus. Burstein Stanley Mayer, ed. and trans. Sources from the Ancient Near East, vol. 1, f. 5. Malibu: Undena Publications.
Droit Roger-Pol. 1989. L'Oublie de l'Inde: une amnésie philosphique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Dumont Louis. 1970. The ‘Village Community’ from Munro to Maine. In Religion/Politics and History in India: Collected Papers in Indian Sociology. Paris, The Hague: Mouton Publishers, 112–32. (Original version in Contributions to Indian Sociology 9 [1966]: 67–89).
Eliade Mircea. 2005 [1949]. The Myth of the Eternal Return. Introduction by Jonathan Z. Smith. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Engels Friedrich. 1884. Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigenthums und des Staats, in Anschluss an L. H. Morgan's Forschungen. Zurich: Hottingen.
Engels Frederick [Friedrich]. 1972. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, in the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan. New York: International Publishers.
Fustel de Coulanges Numa Denis. 1864. La cité antique, étude sur le culte, le droit, les institutions de la Grèce et de Rome. Paris: Durand.
Fustel de Coulanges Numa Denis. 1980. The Ancient City, a Study on the Religion, Laws, and Institutions of Greece and Rome. Small Willard, trans. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gobineau Joseph Arthur, Comte de. 1853–1855. Essai sur l'inégalité des races humaines. 4 vols. Paris: Firmin Didot Freres.
Gobineau Joseph Arthur, Comte de. 1856. The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races, with Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of Mankind. Hotz H., ed., with appendices by J. C. Nott, M.D. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott. (Repr. New York and London: Garland, l984.)
Grimm Jacob. 1819. Deutsche Grammatik. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Buchhandlung.
Guha Sumit. 2004. Speaking Historically: The Changing Voices of Historical Narration in Western India, 1400–1900. American Historical Review 109: 1084–103.
Halbfass Wilhelm. 1988. India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hegel G.W.F. 1970. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, Werke 12. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel G.W.F. 1975. Introduction: Reason in History. In Lectures on the Philosophy of World History. Nisbet H. B, trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson Thomas. Ca. 1782. Notes on the State of Virginia. N.p.: n.p.
Johnson Samuel. 1755. A Dictionary of the English Language. (Repr. London: Times Books, 1983.)
Jones William. 1788. The Third Anniversary Discourse, Delivered 2 February, 1786, by the President. (On the Hindus). Asiatic Researches 1: 415–31.
Lassen Christan. 18471858. Indische Alterthumskunde. 4 vols. Bonn: H. B. Keonig; Leipzig: L. A. Kittler.
Maine Henry Sumner. 1871. Village-Communities in the East and West. London: J. Murray.
Maine Henry Sumner. 1875. Lectures in the Early History of Institutions. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
Maine Henry Sumner. 1883. Dissertations on Early Law and Custom. London: John Murray.
Maine Henry Sumner. 1970 [1861]. Ancient Law, Its Connection with the Early History of Society and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. 10th ed., with introduction and notes by Pollock Frederick. Gloster, Mass.: Peter Smith.
Majumdar R. C. 1951. History and Culture of the Indian People, vol. 1. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Mantena Rama. The Question of History in Precolonial India. 2007. History and Theory 46: 396408.
Manu . 2005. Manu's Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Manava-Dharmasastra. Olivelle Patrick, ed. and trans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maurice Thomas. 1793–1800. Indian Antiquities: Or, Dissertations, Relative to the Ancient Geographical Divisions, the Pure System of Primeval Theology, the Grand Code of Civil Laws, the Original Form of Government, and the Various and Profound Literature of Hindostan. 7 vols. London: the author.
Maurice Thomas. 1822. Memoirs of the Author of Indian Antiquities. Part III. London: the author.
Morgan L. H. 1851. League of the Ho-dé-no-sau-nee, or Iroquois. Rochester: Sage and Brother.
Morgan L. H. 1871. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, vol. 17. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Narayana Rao V., Shulman David, and Subrahmanyam Sanjay. 2001. Textures of Time: Writing History in South India 1600–1800. Delhi: Permanent Black.
Pallas P. S. 17801789. Linguarum Totius Orbis Vocabularia Comparativa. 2 vols. St. Petersberg: Carl Schnoor.
Pargiter F. E. 1962. The Purana Text of the Dynasties of the Kali Age. 2d ed.Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.
Pathak V. S. 1966. Ancient Historians of India: A Study in Historical Biographies. London: Asia Publishing House.
Pingree David. 1963. Astronomy and Astrology in India and Iran. Isis 54: 229–46.
Pingree David. 1978. History of Mathematical Astronomy in India. In Gillispie Charles Coulston, ed., Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. 15, suppl. 1, 533633.
Rocher Ludo and Rocher Rosane. 1994–1995. The Puranarthaprakasa: Jones's Primary Source on Indian Chronology. Bulletin of the Deccan College Post-Graduate & Research Institute 54–55: 4771. (Romanized Sanskrit text of the work.)
Thapar Romila 1992. Interpreting Early India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Trautmann Thomas R. 1992a. The Revolution in Ethnological Time. Man n.s. 27: 379–97.
Trautmann Thomas R. 1992b. Indian Time, European Time. In Hughes Diane Owen and Trautmann Thomas R., eds., Time: Histories and Ethnologies. Ann Arbor: Comparative Studies in Society and History Book Series, University of Michigan Press, 167–97.
Trautmann Thomas R. 1997. Aryans and British India. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
Trautmann Thomas R. 2006. Languages and Nations: The Dravidian Proof in Colonial Madras. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
Trautmann Thomas R. 2008. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. New ed. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Trautmann Thomas R. 2009. Riot over Ryotwar. In Trautmann Thomas, ed., The Madras School of Orientalism: Producing Knowledge in Colonial South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 310–32.
Verbrugghe Gerald P. and Wickersham John M.. 1996. Berossos and Manetho, Introduced and Translated: Native Traditions in Ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Wagoner Phillip B. 1993. Tidings of the King: A Translation and Ethnohistorical Analysis of the Rayavacakamu. Honolulu: University of Hawaìi Press.
Warder A. K. 1972. An Introduction to Indian Historiography. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
Whitman Walt. 1871. Passage to India. Washington, D.C.: J. C. Redford, for the author.
Whitman Walt. 1982. Walt Whitman: Complete Poetry and Collected Prose. New York: Library of America.
Wilson H. H. 1854 [1st ed. 1831]. An Introduction to Universal History, for the Use of Schools. 5th ed.Calcutta: Calcutta School Book Society.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
  • ISSN: 0010-4175
  • EISSN: 1475-2999
  • URL: /core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 82 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 318 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.