Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Field Theory and Interdisciplinarity: History and Sociology in Germany and France during the Twentieth Century

  • George Steinmetz (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This article develops a theory of interdisciplinarity and examines relations between historians and sociologists in Germany and France over the course of the twentieth century, focusing in on several key moments of interdisciplinary activity. Interdisciplinary engagements are motivated by scholarly problems, field-specific interests and battles, and pressures and inducements coming from states, businesses, and scientific institutions. Analysis of the most productive moments of cross-disciplinary interaction suggests that they occur when disciplines are equal in power and when scholars are motivated by scholarly problems and disciplinary conflicts to move beyond their disciplines. More generative forms of interdisciplinarity are dialogic and processual, characterized by a fusion of perspectives; less productive forms are externally induced, involve asymmetrical partners, and are organized around division of disciplinary labor rather than an interpenetration of perspectives. The most productive interdisciplinary conjunctures result from serendipitous resonances and contingent synchronicities between subfields of semi-autonomous disciplines. It is thus impossible to produce the most fruitful forms of interdisciplinarity deliberately. The article examines three cases of symmetrical, processual interdisciplinarity involving sociology and history. Two of these cases were located in the French academic field, first between the wars, and then again after 1980. The other case of dialogic collaboration between historians and sociologists begins in Nazi Germany and continues after 1945 into the 1960s, leading to the formation of West German Historische Sozialwissenschaft. Examples of unbalanced interdisciplinarity include German “History-Sociology” during the Weimar Republic, in which sociologists’ opening to history was not reciprocated by professional historians and Historische Sozialwissenschaft after 1970.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Field Theory and Interdisciplinarity: History and Sociology in Germany and France during the Twentieth Century
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Field Theory and Interdisciplinarity: History and Sociology in Germany and France during the Twentieth Century
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Field Theory and Interdisciplinarity: History and Sociology in Germany and France during the Twentieth Century
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
geostein@umich.edu
References
Hide All
AbbottAndrew. 1999. Department & Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
AdamsJulia, Clemens Elisabeth S., and Orloff Ann Shola, eds. 2005. Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham: Duke University Press.
AronRaymond. 1964 [1935]. German Sociology. Glencoe: Free Press.
BarrowClyde W. 1990. Universities and the Capitalist State: Corporate Liberalism and the Reconstruction of American Higher Education, 1894–1928. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
BaverezNicolas. 1993. Raymond Aron: un moraliste au temps des ideologies. Paris: Flammarion.
BeerMathias. 1998. Im Spannungsfeld von Politik und Zeitgeschichte. Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 46, 3: 345–89.
BeiserFrederick C. 2011. The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BelowGeorg von. 1919. Soziologie als Lehrfach. Schmollers Jahrbuch 43, 4: 59110.
BerrHenri and Febvre Lucien. 1935. History. In Seligman Edwin and Johnson Alvin, eds., Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 7. New York: Macmillan, 357–68.
BesnardPhilippe. 1983. The Epistemological Polemic: François Simiand. In Besnard Philippe, ed., The Sociological Domain: The Durkheimians and the Founding of French Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 248–62.
BhaskarRoy. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.
BhaskarRoy. 1986. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.
BhaskarRoy. 1997 [1975]. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.
BlackbournDavid and Eley Geoff. 1984. The Peculiarities of German History. New York: Oxford University Press.
BlochMarc. 1925. Memoire collective, tradition et coutume. Revue de synthese historique 40: 7383.
BlochMarc. 1939–1940. La société féodale, vol. 1. Paris: A. Michel.
BlochMarc. 1953. The Historian's Craft. New York: Knopf.
BougléCélestin. 1896. Les sciences sociales en Allemagne: Les methodes actuelles. Paris: F. Alcan.
BougléCélestin. 1901–1902. Review of Revue de synthèse . Année sociologique, series 1, 5: 138–40.
BougléCélestin. 1934. Histoire et sociologie: remarques générales. Annales sociologiques, series A, 1: 172–82.
BougléCélestin. 1935. Bilan de la sociologie française contemporaine. Paris: Alcan.
BourdieuPierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BourdieuPierre. 1991. On the Possibility of a Field of World Sociology. In Bourdieu Pierre and Coleman James S., eds., Social Theory for a Changing Society. Boulder: Westview Press, 373–87.
BourdieuPierre. 1993. Some Properties of Fields. In Sociology in Question. London: Sage, 7277.
BourdieuPierre. 1996. The Rules of Art. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BourdieuPierre. 1998. On Television. New York: The New Press.
BourdieuPierre. 2013. Manet: une révolution symbolique. Paris: Seuil.
BourdieuPierre and Chartier Roger. 2015. The Sociologist and the Historian. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BourdieuPierre and Raphael Lutz. 1995. Sur les rapports entre la sociologie et l'histoire en Allemagne et en France. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 106–7: 108–22.
BourdieuPierre, et al. 1995. Deux séminaires (Paris-Gôttingen). Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 106–7: 102–4.
BraudelFernand. 1980 [1958]. History and Sociology. In On History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 6482.
BreuerStefan. 1988. Max Weber als Historiker. Rechtshistorisches Journal 7: 8083.
BühlWalter Ludwig. 2003. Historische Soziologie: Theoreme und Methoden. Münster: Lit.
BurguièreAndré. 2005. Plozévet, une mystique de l'interdisciplinarité? Cahiers du Centre de recherches historiques 36: 231–63.
BurkePeter. 2015. The French Historical Revolution: The Annales School, 1929–2014. 2d ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
BurleighMichael. 1988. Germany Turns Eastwards: A Study of Ostforschung in the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CalhounCraig. 1996. The Rise and Domestication of Historical Sociology. In McDonald Terrence J., ed., The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 305–38.
CharleChristophe. 2013. Homo historicus: réflexions sur l'histoire, les historiens et les sciences sociales. Paris: Armand Colin.
CharleChristophe and Ferré Régine, eds. 1985. Le Personnel de l'enseignement supérieur en France aux XIXe et XXe siécles. Paris: Éditions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique.
ChartierRoger. 2002. Le sociologue et l'historien. Entretien. Sciences humaines, special issue: 8085.
ChristinOlivier. 2006. La discipline historique et Bourdieu. In Müller Hans-Peter and Sintomer Yves, eds., Pierre Bourdieu, théorie et pratique. Paris: Découverte, 146–54.
ColeJonathan R. 2015. Academic Freedom under Fire. In Bilgrami Akeel and Cole Jonathan R., eds., Who's Afraid of Academic Freedom? New York: Columbia University Press, 4056.
ColliniStefan. 1985. What Is Intellectual History? History Today 35, 10: 4648.
ConzeWerner. 1938. Wilna und der Nordosten Polens. Osteuropa: Zeitschrift für die gesamten Fragen des europischen Ostens 13: 657–64.
ConzeWerner. 1940. Die ländliche Überbevölkerung in Polen. In Travaux du XIVe congrès international de sociologie Bucuresti (1939), Communications, Série B, Le village, vol. 1, 4048.
ConzeWerner. 1952. Die Stellung der Sozialgeschichte in Forschung und Unterricht. Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht 3: 648–57.
ConzeWerner. 1977. Die deutsche Geschichtswissenschaft seit 1945: Bedingungen und Ergebnisse. Historische Zeitschrift 225, 1: 128.
ConzeWerner. 1979. Die Gründung des Arbeitskreises für moderne Sozialgeschichte. Hamburger Jahrbuch für Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik 24: 2332.
CoserLewis A. 1992. Introduction. In Halbwachs Maurice, ed., On Collective Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 134.
CraigJohn E. 1983. Sociology and the Related Disciplines between the Wars: Maurice Halbwachs and the Imperialism of the Durkheimians. In Besnard Philippe, ed., The Sociological Domain: The Durkheimians and the Founding of French Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 263–89.
DörkUwe and Borggräfe Henning. 2015. Wissen und Organisation. Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie und der Historikerverband. Comparativ: Leipziger Beiträge zur Universalgeschichte und vergleichenden Gesellschaftsforschung 25, 1–2: 1935.
DumoulinOlivier. 1986. Le professionalization de l'histoire en France (1919–1939). In Société française de sociologie, ed., Historiens et sociologues aujourd'hui. Paris: CNRS, 4960.
DumoulinOlivier. 1990. Changer l'histoire. Marché universitaire et innovation intellectuelle à l’époque de Marc Bloch. In Atsma Hartmut and Burguière André, eds., Marc Bloch aujourd'hui. Paris: Éditions de l'EHESS, 87104.
DunkhaseJan Eike. 2010. Werner Conze: ein deutscher Historiker im 20. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
DurkheimÉmile. 1898. Préface. L'Année sociologique 1: ivii.
DurkheimÉmile. 1982. Debate on Explanation in History and Sociology. In Lukes Steven, ed., The Rules of Sociological Method. London: Macmillan, 211–28.
FabianiJean-Louis. 1988. Les Philosophes de la République. Paris: Les Éditions De Minuit.
FabianiJean-Louis. 2015. La sociologie par les textes. Sciences humaines 273 (Aug.–Sept.): 2831.
FischerPeter. 2008. Historische Soziologie als Kultursoziologie? Hamburg Review of Social Sciences 3: 172–92.
FligsteinNeil and McAdam Doug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
FrancisEmerich. 1951. History and the Social Sciences: Some Reflections on the Re-Integration of Social Science. Review of Politics 13: 354–74.
FreyerHans. 1948. Weltgeschichte Europas. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Dieterich.
FrickelScott and Ilhan Ali O.. 2016. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Change in Six Social Sciences: A Longitudinal Comparison. In Frickel Scott, Albert Mathieu, and Prainsack Barbara, eds., Investigating Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Theory and Practice across Disciplines. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 148–72.
GeorgakakisDidier and Vauchez Antoine. 2015. Le concept de champ à l’épreuve de l'Europe. In Siméant Johanna, ed., Guide de l'enquête globale en sciences sociales. Paris: CNRS, 197217.
GingrasYves. 2014. L'historien dans la Cité: l'objectivation contre l'instrumentalisation. Bulletin d'histoire politique 22, 3: 265–86.
GorskiPhil. 2013. Bourdieusian Theory and Historical Analysis. In Gorski Phil, ed., Bourdieusian Theory and Historical Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press, 327–66.
GraffHarvey J. 2015. Undisciplining Knowledge: Interdisciplinarity in the Twentieth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gulbenkian Commission. 1997. Open the Social Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
GutbergerJörg. 1996. Volk, Raum, und Sozialstruktur: Sozialstruktur- und Sozialraumforschung im “Dritten Reich.” Munster: LIT Verlag.
GuttingGary. 2001. French Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HaarIngo and Fahlbusch Michael, eds. 2005. German Scholars and Ethnic Cleansing (1920–1945). New York: Berghahn Books.
HalbwachsMaurice. 1925. Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Paris: Alcan.
HalbwachsMaurice. 1932. La sociologie en Allemagne et aux Etats-Unis. Annales d'histoire économique et sociale 4, 13: 8081.
HalbwachsMaurice 1950. La mémoire collective. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
HallJohn A. 1989. They Do Things Differently There, or, the Contribution of British Historical Sociology . British Journal of Sociology 40: 544–64.
HardtwigWolfgang and Wehler Hans-Ulrich. 1996. Einleitung. In Kulturgeschichte heute. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 713.
HasbergWolfgang and Seidenfuss Manfred, eds. 2005. Geschichtsdidaktik(er) im Griff des Nationalsozialismus? Münster: Lit.
HeilbronJohan. 2008. Qu'est-ce qu'une tradition nationale en sciences sociales? Revue d'histoire des sciences humaines 18: 316.
HeilbronJohan. 2015. French Sociology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
HeskethIan. 2011. The Science of History in Victorian Britain. London: Pickering & Chatto.
HexterJ. H. 1972. Fernand Braudel and the Monde Braudellien. Journal of Modern History 44, 4: 480539.
IggersGeorg G. 1997. Historiography in the Twentieth Century. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press.
IggersGeorge G. 2005. Foreword. In Haar Ingo and Fahlbusch Michael, eds., German Scholars and Ethnic Cleansing (1920–1945). New York: Berghahn Books, viixviii.
JacobsJerry A. 2013. In Defense of Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and Specialization in the Research University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
JacobsJerry A. and Frickel Scott. 2009. Interdisciplinarity: A Critical Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 35, 4365.
JayMartin. 2011. The Menace of Consilience. In Foshay Raphael, ed., Valences of Interdisciplinarity: Theory, Practice, Pedagogy. Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press, 3146.
KaeslerDirk. 1984. Die frühe deutsche Soziologie 1900 bis 1934 und ihre Entstehungs-Milieus. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
KaradyVictor. 1976. Emile Durkheim, les sciences sociales et l'Université: bilan d'un semi-échec. Revue française de sociologie 17, 2: 267311.
KaterMichael H. 1991. Refugee Historians in America: Preemigration Germany to 1939. In Lehmann Hartmut and Sheehan James J., eds., An Interrupted Past: German-Speaking Refugee Historians in the United States after 1933. New York: Cambridge University Press, 7393.
KershawIan. 1993. Working Towards the Führer: Reflections on the Nature of the Hitler Dictatorship. Contemporary European History 2, 2: 103–18.
KeylorWilliam R. 1975. Academy and Community: The Foundation of the French Historical Profession. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
KlingemannCarsten. 1996. Soziologie im Dritten Reich. Sinzheim: Nomos-Verlag, Baden-Baden.
KlingemannCarsten. 2009. Soziologie und Politik: Sozialwissenschaftliches Expertenwissen im Dritten Reich und in der frühen westdeutschen Nachkriegszeit. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
KuklickHenrika. 1983. The Sociology of Knowledge: Retrospect and Prospect. Annual Review of Sociology 9: 287310.
LacombePaul. 1894. De l'histoire considérée comme science. Paris: Hachette.
LangewiescheDieter. 1997. Die Universität Tübingen in der Zeit des Nationalsozialismus: Formen der Selbstgleichstaltung und Selbstbehauptung. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 23: 618–46.
LautmanJacques. 2012. Le CNRS et la sociologie. Histoire de la recherche contemporaine 2, 2: 182–88.
LenoirTimothy. 1997. Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
LerouxRobert. 1998. Histoire et sociologie en France: de l'histoire-science à la sociologie durkheimienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
LindenfeldDavid F. 1997. The Practical Imagination: The German Sciences of State in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
LittleDaniel. 2016. New Directions in the Philosophy of Social Science. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
LukácsGyörgy. 1981. The Destruction of Reason. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.
LukesS. 1985. Emile Durkheim. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
MachinHoward. 1984. The CNRS and Social Science Research in France. In Lisle Edmond, Machin Howard, and Yasin Sy, eds., Traversing the Crisis: The Social Sciences in Britain and France. London: Economic and Social Research Council, 145239.
MaillardAlain. 2005. Les temps de l'historien et du sociologue. Retour sur la dispute Braudel-Gurvitch. Cahiers internationaux de sociologie 119: 197222.
MannheimKarl. 1932. Die Gegenwartsaufgaben der Soziologie: ihre Lehrgestalt. Tübingen: Mohr.
MannheimKarl. 1934. German Sociology (1918–1933). Politica (Feb.): 1233.
MannheimKarl. 1952 [1924]. Historicism. In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Kecskemeti Paul, ed. London: Routlege and Kegan Paul, 84133.
MarcelJean-Christophe. 2001. Le Durkheimisme dans l'entre-deux guerres. Paris: PUF.
MartinOlivier. 2005. Une étude des institutions de la recherche en histoire, philosophie et sociologie des sciences. La revue pour l'histoire du CNRS 13 (Nov.). At: http://histoire-cnrs.revues.org/1614 (consulted 16 May 2016).
MarxKarl. 1970. The German Ideology, Chapter 1. In Marx Karl and Engels Friedrich, Selected Works, vol. 1. Moscow: Progress, 1680.
MauSteffen and Huschka Denis. 2010. Who Is Who? Die Sozialstruktur der Soziologie-Professorenschaft in Deutschland. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 62: 751–66.
MaussMarcel. 1925. Review of Henri Berr. L’évolution de l'humanité. Année sociologique ser. 2, vol. 1: 289–90.
MihicS., Engelmann S. G., and Wingrove E. R.. 2005. Facts, Values, and ‘Real’ Numbers. In Steinmetz George, ed., The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham: Duke University Press, 470–95.
MommsenWolfgang J. 1988. La situation de l'historien et l'enseignement de l'histoire dans la République Fédérale d'Allemagne. In Réymond René, ed., Être historien aujourd'hui. Toulouse: Erés, 2942.
MommsenWolfgang J. 1991. German Historiography during the Weimar Republic and the Émigré Historians. In Daum Andreas W., Lehmann Hartmut, and Sheehan James J., eds., The Second Generation: Émigrés from Nazi Germany as Historians. New York: Berghahn, 3367.
MullerJerry Z. 1987. The Other God that Failed: Hans Freyer and the Deradicalization of German Conservatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
MullinsNicholas C. 1973. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper & Row.
NicolasSerge. 2007. Histoire de la philosophie en France au XIXe siècle. Paris: L'Harmattan.
NoirielGérard. 1990. Naissance du métier d'historien. Genèses 1: 5885.
NoirielGérard. 1996. Sur la “crise” de l'histoire. Paris: Belin.
NovickPeter. 1988. That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OakesGuy. 1987. Weber and the Southwest German School: The Genesis of the Concept of the Historical Individual. In Mommsen Theodor and Osterhammel Jürgen, eds., Max Weber and His Contemporaries. London: Unwin Hyman, 434–46.
OberkromeWilli. 1993. Volksgeschichte: Methodische Innovation und völkische Ideologisierung in der deutschen Geschichtswissenschaft 1918–1945. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
OberkromeWilli. 1995. Aspekte der deutschsprachigen Volksgeschichte. In Garleff Michael, ed., Zwischen Konfrontation und Kompromiss. München: R. Oldenbourg, 3746.
PeirceCharles Sanders. 1931. Collected Papers, vol. 1. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
PiriouOdile. 2008. Que deviennent les diplômés de sociologie? Un état de la discipline et de son avenir. Socio-logos: Revue de l'association française de sociologie 3. At https://socio-logos.revues.org/1622 (consulted 2 Dec. 2016).
RaphaelLutz. 1994. Die Erben von Bloch und Febvre: Annales-Geschichtsschreibung und nouvelle histoire in Frankreich 1945–1980. Stuttgart: Klett.
RebériouxMadeleine. 1983. Le débat de 1903: Historiens et sociologues. In Carbonell Charles-Olivier, ed., Au berceau des Annales: le milieu strasbourgeois. Toulouse: Presses de l'Institut d’études politiques de Toulouse, 219–30.
RevelJacques. 1979. Histoire et sciences sociales: les paradigmes des Annales. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 34, 6: 1360–76.
RevelJacques and Chartier Roger. 1979. Lucien Febvre et les sciences humaines. Historiens et geographes 272: 427–42.
RobbinsDerek. 2011. Social Theory and Politics: Aron, Bourdieu and Passeron, and the Events of May 1968. In Susen S. and Turner B. S., eds., The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays. London: Anthem Press, 301–27.
RocheDaniel. 1986. Les historiens aujourd'hui: Remarques pour un débat. Vingtième Siècle, revue d'histoire 12: 320.
RösslerBeate. 2013. Kantian Autonomy and Its Social Preconditions. On Axel Honneth's Das Recht der Freiheit . Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 1, 1417.
RueschemeyerDietrich. 1958. Probleme der Wissenssoziologie. PhD diss., Cologne.
Salomon-DelatourGottfried. 1962. Sozialgeschichte und Geschichtssoziologie. In König René, ed., Handbuch der empirischen Sozialforschung. Stuttgart: F. Enke, 601–38.
SchiederWolfgang. 1987. Sozialgeschichte zwischen Soziologie und Geschichte: Das wissenschaftliche Lebenswerk Werner Conzes. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 13, 2: 244–66.
SchleierHans. 1975. Die bürgerliche deutsche Geschichtsschreibung der Weimarer Republik. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
SchmittCarl. 1950. Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus publicum Europaeum. Köln: Greven.
SchnitzlerSonja. 2012. Soziologie im Nationalsozialismus zwischen Wissenschaft und Politik. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
SchulzeWinfried. 1974. Soziologie und Geschichtswissenschaft: Einführung in die Probleme der Kooperation beider Wissenschaften. München: W. Fink.
SchulzeWinfried. 1989. Deutsche Geschichtswissenschaft nach 1945. München: Oldenbourg.
SchützeichelRainer. 2004. Historische Soziologie. Bielefeld: Transcript.
SewellWilliam H.Jr. 1996. Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology. In McDonald Terrence J., ed., The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 245–80.
SimiandFrançois. 1903. Méthode historique et science social. Revue de synthèse historique 6 (Jan.–June): 1157.
SmithDennis. 1991. The Rise of Historical Sociology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
SteinmetzGeorge. 1998. Critical Realism and Historical Sociology. Comparative Studies in Society and History 40, 1, 170–86.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2005. American Sociology's Epistemological Unconscious and the Transition to Post-Fordism: The Case of Historical Sociology. In Adams Julia, Clemens Elisabeth S., and Orloff Ann Shola, eds., Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham: Duke University Press, 109–57.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2007a. The Devil's Handwriting: Precoloniality and the German Colonial State in Qingdao, Samoa, and Southwest Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2007b. American Sociology before and after World War Two: The (Temporary) Settling of a Disciplinary Field. In Calhoun Craig, ed., Sociology in America: The ASA Centennial History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 314–66.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2009. Neo-Bourdieusian Theory and the Question of Scientific Autonomy: German Sociologists and Empire, 1890s–1940s. Political Power and Social Theory 20, 71131.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2010a. Ideas in Exile: Refugees from Nazi Germany and the Failure to Transplant Historical Sociology into the United States. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 23, 1: 127.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2010b. Charles Tilly, Historicism, and the Critical Realist Philosophy of Science. American Sociologist 41, 4: 312–36.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2011. Bourdieu, Historicity, and Historical Sociology. Cultural Sociology 11, 1: 4566.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2013. Toward Socioanalysis: The ‘Traumatic Kernel’ of Psychoanalysis and Neo-Bourdieusian Theory. In Gorski Phil, ed., Bourdieu and Historical Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press: 108–30.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2015. Historical Sociology, Ethics, Policy, and Politics. Trajectories: Newsletter of the ASA Comparative and Historical Sociology Section 28, 2: 110.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2016. Social Fields, Subfields, and Social Spaces, at the Scale of Empires: Explaining the Colonial State and Colonial Sociology. Sociological Review 64, 2: 98123.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2017. Sociology and Colonialism in the British and French Empires, 1940s–1960s. Journal of Modern History (forthcoming in Sept.).
StelzelPhilipp. 2010. Rethinking Modern German History: Critical Social History as a Transatlantic Enterprise, 1945–1989. PhD diss., University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.
TaylorPeter J. 2016. Corporate Social Science and the Loss of Curiosity. Items: Insights from the Social Sciences. Social Science Research Council, New York. At http://items.ssrc.org/corporate-social-science-and-the-loss-of-curiosity/ (accessed 2 Dec. 2016).
TenbruckFriedrich H. 1984. Die unbewältigten Sozialwissenschaften. Graz: Verlag Styria.
TendlerJoseph. 2013. Opponents of the Annales School. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
TroeltschErnst. 1922. Der Historismus und seine Probleme. Tübingen: C. B. Mohr.
TrüperHenning. 2005. Die Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte und ihr Herausgeber Hermann Aubin im Nationalsozialismus. Stuttgart: Steiner.
Vom BrockeBernhard. 1971. Kurt Breysig: Geschichtswissenschaft zwischen Historismus und Soziologie. Lübeck: Matthiesen.
Von WieseLeopold. 1948. Erster Vortrag. Die gegenwärtige Situation, soziologisch betrachtet. In Verhandlungen des Achten Deutschen Soziologentages. Tübingen: Verlag J.C.B. Mohr, 2041.
WahlAdalbert. 1925–1926. Wiederholungen im Verlauf des historischen Geschehens. Philosophischer Anzeiger 1: 417–26.
WangYingyao. 2016. Homology and Isomorphism: Bourdieu in Conversation with New Institutionalism. British Journal of Sociology 67, 2: 348–70.
WehlerHans-Ulrich, ed. 1968. Moderne deutsche Sozialgeschichte. Köln: Kiepenheur & Witsch.
WehlerHans-Ulrich. 1971–1982. Deutsche Historiker, vols. 1–9. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
WehlerHans-Ulrich. 1972. Geschichte und Soziologie. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.
WehlerHans-Ulrich. 1975. Modernisierungstheorie und Geschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
WehlerHans-Ulrich 1977. Sozialgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
WehlerHans-Ulrich. 1984. Historiography in Germany Today. In Habermas Jürgen, ed., Observations on “The Spiritual Situation of the Age.” Cambridge: MIT Press, 221–59.
WeißJohannes. 1995. Negative Soziologie. Ethik und Sozialwissenschajften 6: 241–46.
WelskoppThomas. 2005. Alien Allies: The Relations between History, Sociology, and Economics in Germany, 19th–20th Centuries. In Olábarri Ignacio and Caspistegui Francisco, eds., The Strength of History at the Doors of the New Millenium. Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra, 103–28.
WelskoppThomas. 2010. Irritating Flirtations: Reflections on the Relationship between History and Sociology since the 1970s. InterDisciplines 1: 942.
WhimsterSam. 1987. Karl Lamprecht and Max Weber. In Mommsen Theodor and Osterhammel Jürgen, eds., Max Weber and His Contemporaries. London: Unwin Hyman, 268–83.
WilsonEdward O. 1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Knopf.
WitteburKlemens. 1991. Die Deutsche Soziologie im Exil, 1933–1945: Eine Biographische Karthographie. Münster: Lit.E
WrightErik Olin. 2012. Transforming Capitalism through Real Utopias. American Sociological Review 20, 10: 125.
ZieburaGilbert. 1990. Die Rolle der Sozialwissenschaften in der westdeutschen Historiographie der internationalen Beziehungen. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 16, 1: 79103.
ZysiakAgata. 2015. Modernizing Science: Between a Liberal, Social, and Socialistic University—The Case of Poland and the University Of Łódź (1945–1953). Science in Context 28, 2: 215–36.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
  • ISSN: 0010-4175
  • EISSN: 1475-2999
  • URL: /core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 40
Total number of PDF views: 206 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 376 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th April 2017 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.