Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 45
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Axelsson, Per and Wisselgren, Maria J. 2016. Sweden in 1930 and the 1930 census. The History of the Family, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 61.


    Hodgson, Dennis 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.


    Reynolds, Lindsey 2015. Category and Kin in “Crisis”: Representations of Kinship, Care, and Vulnerability in Demographic and Ethnographic Research in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 50, Issue. 4, p. 539.


    Suh, Siri 2015. “Right tool,” wrong “job”: Manual vacuum aspiration, post-abortion care and transnational population politics in Senegal. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 135, p. 56.


    Szreter, Simon 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.


    Basu, Alaka M. 2014. Demography for the Public: Literary Representations of Population Research and Policy. Development and Change, Vol. 45, Issue. 5, p. 813.


    Storeng, Katerini T. and Béhague, Dominique P. 2014. “Playing the Numbers Game”: Evidence-based Advocacy and the Technocratic Narrowing of the Safe Motherhood Initiative. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, Vol. 28, Issue. 2, p. 260.


    Williams, Rebecca Jane 2014. Storming the Citadels of Poverty: Family Planning under the Emergency in India, 1975–1977. The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 73, Issue. 02, p. 471.


    Iyer, Samantha 2013. Colonial Population and the Idea of Development. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 55, Issue. 01, p. 65.


    Abbasi-Shavazi, Mohammad Jalal Askari Nodoushan, Abbas and Thornton, Arland 2012. Family Life and Developmental Idealism in Yazd, Iran. Demographic Research, Vol. 26, p. 207.


    Danby, Colin 2012. Postwar Norm. Rethinking Marxism, Vol. 24, Issue. 4, p. 499.


    Greenhalgh, Susan 2012. On the Crafting of Population Knowledge. Population and Development Review, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 121.


    KRIEGER, NANCY 2012. Who and What Is a “Population”? Historical Debates, Current Controversies, and Implications for Understanding “Population Health” and Rectifying Health Inequities. Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 90, Issue. 4, p. 634.


    Marchesi, Milena 2012. Reproducing Italians: contested biopolitics in the age of ‘replacement anxiety’. Anthropology & Medicine, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 171.


    Repo, Jemima 2012. The governance of fertility through gender equality in the EU and Japan. Asia Europe Journal, Vol. 10, Issue. 2-3, p. 199.


    Schellekens, Jona and van Poppel, Frans 2012. Marital Fertility Decline in the Netherlands: Child Mortality, Real Wages, and Unemployment, 1860–1939. Demography, Vol. 49, Issue. 3, p. 965.


    Van Dalen, Hendrik P. and Henkens, Kène 2012. What is on a Demographer’s Mind?. Demographic Research, Vol. 26, p. 363.


    Davies, Amanda 2011. On constructing ageing rural populations: ‘Capturing’ the grey nomad. Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 191.


    Frandsen, Martin and Triantafillou, Peter 2011. Biopower at the molar level: Liberal government and the invigoration of Danish society. Social Theory & Health, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. 203.


    Grimes, Seamus 2010. A Review of “Fatal Misconceptions: The Struggle to Control World Population”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 100, Issue. 2, p. 490.


    ×
  • Comparative Studies in Society and History, Volume 38, Issue 1
  • January 1996, pp. 26-66

The Social Construction of Population Science: An Intellectual, Institutional, and Political History of Twentieth-Century Demography

  • Susan Greenhalgh (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500020119
  • Published online: 01 June 2009
Abstract

Demographers have often lamented their field's reputation as one of “all methods and no theory.” Pushed by advances in computer technology and pulled by the appeal of being the “hardest,” most scientistic of the social sciences, the field has grown ever more sophisticated in mathematical technique. At the same time, theory has languished, becoming increasingly narrow and divorced from the realities of a rapidly changing post-Cold War world (McNicoll 1992). Leading members of the field routinely bemoan this state of affairs, though proposals for remaking the discipline are rarely offered (Preston 1993; Keyfitz 1993).

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Donald J. Bogue . 1993. “How Demography Was Born.” Demography, 30:4, 519–21.

Donald J. Bogue . 1964. “The Demographic Breakthrough: From Projection to Control.” Population Index, 30:4, 449–54.

John C. Caldwell , Pat Caldwell ; and Bruce Caldwell . 1987. “Anthropology and Demography: The Mutual Reinforcement of Speculation and Research.” Current Anthropology, 28:1, 2543.

John Cleland ; and Christopher Wilson . 1987. “Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View.” Population Studies, 41:1, 530.

Herman E. Daly 1971. “A Marxian-Malthusian View of Poverty and Development.” Population Studies, 25:1, 2537.

Kingsley Davis . 1945. “The World Demographic Transition.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 237: 111.

Paul Demeny . 1988. “Social Science and Population Policy.” Population and Development Review, 14:3, 451–79.

Paul Demeny . 1975. “Population Policy: The Role of National Governments.” Population and Development Review, 1:1, 147161.

Jason L. Finkle ; and Barbara B. Crane . 1975. “The Politics of Bucharest: Population, Development, and the New International Economic Order.” Population and Development Review, 1:1, 87114.

; and . . . : .Ronald Freedman John Y. Takeshita 1969 Family Planning in Taiwan PrincetonPrinceton University Press

Thomas F. Gieryn . 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review, 48:6, 781–95.

Susan Greenhalgh . 1990. “Toward a Political Economy of Fertility: Anthropological Perspectives.” Population and Development Review, 16:1, 85106.

M.-Francoise Hall . 1973. “Population Growth: U.S. and Latin American Views—An Interpretation of the Response of the United States and Latin America to Latin American Population Growth.” Population Studies, 27:3, 415–29.

E. A. Hammel 1990. “A Theory of Culture for Demography.” Population and Development Review, 16:3,455–85.

Donna Haraway . 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, 14:3, 575–599.

Philip M. Hauser 1964. “Demographic Dimensions of World Politics,” in Stuart Mudd , ed., The Population Crisis and the Use of World Resources. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Mary E. Hawkesworth 1989. “Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and Claims of Truth.” Signs, 14:3, 533–57.

Gerry E. Hendershot 1973. “Population Size, Military Power, and Antinatal Power.” Demography, 10:4, 517–24.

Louis. Henry 1976. Population: Analysis and Models. New York: Academic.

Dennis Hodgson . 1991. “The Ideological Origins of the Population Association of America.“ Population and Development Review, 17:1, 1ȁ34.

Dennis Hodgson . 1988. “Orthodoxy and Revisionism in American Demography.” Population and Development Review, 14:4, 541–69.

Dennis Hodgson . 1983. “Demography as Social Science and Policy Science.” Population and Development Review, 9:1, 134.

John F. Kantner 1982. “Population, Policy, and Political Atavism.” Demography, 19:4, 429–38.

Nathan. Keyfitz 1993. “Thirty Years of Demography and Demography.” Demography, 30:4, 533–49.

John Knodel ; and Etienne van de Walle . 1979. “Lessons from the Past: Policy Implications of Historical Fertility Studies.” Population and Development Review, 5:2, 217–45.

Anders S. Lunde 1981. “The Beginning of the Population Association of America.” Population Index, 47:3, 479–84.

Frank W. Notestein 1951. “Policy of the Indian Government on Family Limitation.” Population Index, 17:4, 254–63.

Nelly. Oudshoorn . 1994. Beyond the Natural Body: An Archaeology of Sex Hormones. London: Routledge.

Andrew Pickering , ed. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Samuel H. Preston 1993. “The Contours of Demography: Estimates and Projections.” Demography, 30:4, 593606.

Samuel H. Preston .1987. “The Social Sciences and the Population Problem.” Sociological Forum, 2:4, 619–44.

Dorothy. Ross 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Peter Schneider . 1984. “Demographic Transitions in a Sicilian Rural Town.” Journal of Family History, 9:3, 245–73.

; and . . , condensed ed. : .Henry S. Shryock Jacob S. Siegel 1976 The Methods and Materials of Demography New YorkAcademic

David R. Shumway ; and Ellen Messer–Davidow . 1991. “Disciplinarity: An Introduction.” Poetics Today, 12:2, 201–25.

Simon Szreter . 1993. “The Idea of Demographic Transition and the Study of Fertility: A Critical Intellectual History.” Population and Development Review, 19:4, 659701.

Jay D. Teachman ; Kathleen Paasch ; and Karen Price Carver . 1993. “Thirty Years of Demography.” Demography, 30:4, 523–32.

Warren S. Thompson 1929. “Population.” American Journal of Sociology, 34:6, 959–75.

Susan Cotts Watkins . 1987. “The Fertility Transition: Europe and the Third World Compared.” Sociological Forum, 2:4, 645–73.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
  • ISSN: 0010-4175
  • EISSN: 1475-2999
  • URL: /core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×