Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Fernández-Villaverde, Jesús 2016. Magna Carta, the rule of law, and the limits on government. International Review of Law and Economics,


    Haslam, S Alexander Reicher, Stephen D and Birney, Megan E 2016. Questioning authority: new perspectives on Milgram's ‘obedience’ research and its implications for intergroup relations. Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 11, p. 6.


    Marchais-Roubelat, Anne and Roubelat, Fabrice 2016. Dominance, stakeholders’ moves and leadership shifts: New directions for transforming futures. Futures, Vol. 80, p. 45.


    Ünaldi, Serhat 2016. A Kingdom in Crisis – What’s All the Fuss About?. Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 46, Issue. 1, p. 120.


    Haslam, S. Alexander Reicher, Stephen D. Millard, Kathryn and McDonald, Rachel 2015. ‘Happy to have been of service’: The Yale archive as a window into the engaged followership of participants in Milgram's ‘obedience’ experiments. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 54, Issue. 1, p. 55.


    Kurlander, Eric 2015. The Nazi Magicians’ Controversy: Enlightenment, “Border Science,” and Occultism in the Third Reich. Central European History, Vol. 48, Issue. 04, p. 498.


    Ünaldi, Serhat 2014. Working Towards the Monarchy and its Discontents: Anti-royal Graffiti in Downtown Bangkok. Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 44, Issue. 3, p. 377.


    KARCH, BRENDAN 2012. Regionalism, Democracy and National Self-Determination in Central Europe. Contemporary European History, Vol. 21, Issue. 04, p. 635.


    ×

‘Working Towards the Führer.’ Reflections on the Nature of the Hitler Dictatorship

Abstract

The renewed emphasis, already visible in the mid-1980s, on the intertwined fates of the Soviet Union and Germany, especially in the Stalin and Hitler eras, has become greatly intensified in the wake of the upheavals in Eastern Europe. The sharpened focus on the atrocities of Stalinism has prompted attempts to relativise Nazi barbarism – seen as wicked, but on the whole less wicked, than that of Stalinism (and by implication of communism in general).1 The brutal Stalinist modernising experiment is used to remove any normative links with humanising, civilising, emancipatory or democratising development from modernisation concepts and thereby to claim that Hitler's regime, too, was – and intentionally so – a ‘modernising dictatorship’.2 Implicit in all this is a reversion, despite the many refinements and criticisms of the concept since the 1960s, to essentially traditional views on ‘totalitarianism’ and to views of Stalin and Hitler as ‘totalitarian dictators’.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Jürgen Kocka , ‘German History before Hitler: The Debate about the German Sonderweg’, Journal of Contemporary History, Vol.23 (1988), 316.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Contemporary European History
  • ISSN: 0960-7773
  • EISSN: 1469-2171
  • URL: /core/journals/contemporary-european-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×