Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Frank, Joshua 2007. Meat as a bad habit: A case for positive feedback in consumption preferences leading to lock-in. Review of Social Economy, Vol. 65, Issue. 3, p. 319.

    Coşgel, Metin M. and Minkler, Lanse 2004. Rationality, integrity, and religious behavior. The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 33, Issue. 3, p. 329.

    Coşgel, Metin M and Minkler, Lanse 2004. Religious Identity and Consumption. Review of Social Economy, Vol. 62, Issue. 3, p. 339.

    Dolfsma, Wilfred 2004. Paradoxes of Modernist Consumption – Reading Fashions. Review of Social Economy, Vol. 62, Issue. 3, p. 351.

    Pietrykowski, Bruce 2004. You Are What You Eat: The Social Economy of the Slow Food Movement. Review of Social Economy, Vol. 62, Issue. 3, p. 307.

    Dolfsma, Wilfred 1999. The Consumption of Music and the Expression of VALUES.. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 58, Issue. 4, p. 1019.

    Coşgel, Metin M. 1997. Consumption Institutions. Review of Social Economy, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, p. 153.


Audience Effects In Consumption

  • Metin M.Coşgel (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 December 2008

Consider how your consumption would change if you were stranded on a deserted island. Isolation would eliminate all social influences on your consumption decisions, even for the same choice set. You might decide not to consume cosmetics, curtains, or neckties, and pay less attention to the style or color of your clothes, car, or furniture. These choices might not matter as much to you anymore, for you would not have to consider the reactions of other individuals to your consumption. Similarly, isolation would also eliminate social influences on your speech. Absent an audience, your choice of words would not be subject to the judgments of others.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Metin M Coşgel . 1992. “Rhetoric in the Economy: Consumption and Audience.” journal of Socio-Economics 21:363–77.

Jon Elster . 1989. “Social Norms and Economic Theory.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3:99117.

Harry G Frankfurt . 1971. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” The Journal of Philosophy 68:520.

Mark Granovetter , and Roland Soong. 1986. “Threshold Models of Interpersonal Effects in Consumer Demand.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7:8399.

Hiroaki Hayakawa , and Yiannis Venieris. 1977. “Consumer Interdependence via Reference Groups.” Journal of Political Economy 85:599615.

Laurence R Iannaccone . 1989. “Bandwagons, and the Threat of Chaos.” Journalof Economic Behavior and Organization 11:431–42.

Harvey Leibenstein . 1950. “Bandwagon, Snob, And Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 64:183207.

Gerald J Postema . 1987. “Collective Evils, Harms, and the Law.” Ethics 97:414–40.

Amartya K Sen . 1970. “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal.” journal of Political Economy 78:152–57.

Amartya K Sen . 1973. “Behavior and the Concept of Preference.” Economica 40:241–59.

Carole J Uhlaner . 1989. “Relational Goods and Participation: Incorporating Sociability into a Theory of Rational Action.” Public Choice 62:253–85.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *