Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Galati, Adriano Mangold, Stefan Prinsloo, Melani Almeida, Luis and Behr, Danie 2015. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Ethics in Networked Systems Research - NS Ethics '15. p. 9.

    Giles, Emma L Sniehotta, Falko F McColl, Elaine and Adams, Jean 2015. Acceptability of financial incentives and penalties for encouraging uptake of healthy behaviours: focus groups. BMC Public Health, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 58.

    Louth, Jonathon 2015. Neoliberalising Cambodia: The Production of Capacity in Southeast Asia. Globalizations, Vol. 12, Issue. 3, p. 400.

    McAreavey, Ruth 2014. On Being Let Loose in the Field: The Execution of Professional Ethics. Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 54, Issue. 1, p. 71.

    2013. Integrated Water Resources Management, Institutions and Livelihoods under Stress.

    Kolb, Robert W. 2010. Incentives in the Financial Crisis of Our Time. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p. 21.

    Carvalho, Luís Francisco and Rodrigues, João 2006. On markets and morality: Revisiting Fred Hirsch. Review of Social Economy, Vol. 64, Issue. 3, p. 331.

    GRANT, RUTH W. 2006. Ethics and Incentives: A Political Approach. American Political Science Review, Vol. 100, Issue. 01,

    Emanuel, Ezekiel J. 2005. Undue Inducement: Nonsense on Stilts?. The American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 5, Issue. 5, p. 9.

    Emanuel, Ezekiel J Currie, Xolani E and Herman, Allen 2005. Undue inducement in clinical research in developing countries: is it a worry?. The Lancet, Vol. 366, Issue. 9482, p. 336.

    Emanuel, Ezekiel J. 2004. Ending Concerns About Undue Inducement. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 100.


The ethics of incentives: historical origins and contemporary understandings

  • Ruth W. Grant (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2002

Increasingly in the modern world, incentives are becoming the tool we reach for when we wish to bring about change. In government, in education, in health care, between and within institutions of all sorts, incentives are offered to steer people's choices in certain directions. But despite the increasing interest in ethics and economics, the ethics of the use of incentives has raised very little concern. From a certain point of view, this is not surprising. When incentives are viewed from the perspective of market economics, they appear to be entirely unproblematic. An incentive is an offer of something of value, sometimes with a cash equivalent and sometimes not, meant to influence the payoff structure of a utility calculation so as to alter a person's course of action. In other words, the person offering the incentive means to make one choice more attractive to the person responding to the incentive than any other alternative. Both parties stand to gain from the resulting choice. In effect, it is a form of trade, and as such, it meets certain ethical requirements by definition. A trade involves voluntary action by all parties concerned to bring about a result that is beneficial to all parties concerned. If these conditions were not met, the trade would simply not occur. And as inducements in a voluntary transaction, incentives certainly have the moral high ground over coercion as an alternative.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *