Skip to main content Accessibility help

Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries1

  • ANDREW WEIR (a1)


This article discusses deletion in spoken and written English. It notes that subjects are frequently dropped both in informal spoken English (Napoli 1982; Zwicky & Pullum 1983b) and in certain registers of written English such as diaries (Haegeman 1990, 1997, 2007; Haegeman & Ihsane 1999, 2001). The article argues in favour of Napoli's phonological analysis of left-edge deletion in spoken English, and provides a formalisation of Napoli's account in the framework of Selkirk's (1995, 2001, 2011) optimality-theoretic analysis of syntax–phonology mapping. A comparison is drawn with the case of subject drop in the diary register. Due to the difference in surface distribution of the phenomenon between the spoken and written cases, the analysis cannot transfer directly. However, I suggest that, combined with arguments made by Haegeman (2002) for a sentence-medial position for modifiers in written English, the phonological analysis can account for a large subset of the diary drop cases.



Hide All
Akmajian, Adrian, Demers, Richard A., Farmer, Ann K. & Harnish, Robert M.. 1995. Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication, 4th edn.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bader, Markus. 1998. Prosodic influences on reading syntactically ambiguous sentences. In Fodor, Janet D. & Ferreira, Fernanda (eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 21), 146. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by step: Essays in Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89115. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 152. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos P. & Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Elfner, Emily. 2011. The interaction of linearization and prosody: Evidence from pronoun postposing in Irish. In Carnie, Andrew (ed.), Formal approaches to Celtic linguistics, 1140. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Gerken, LouAnn. 1991. The metrical basis for children's subjectless sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 30 (4), 431–51.
Gerken, LouAnn. 1994. Young children's representation of prosodic phonology: Evidence from English-speakers’ weak syllable productions. Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1), 1938.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1987a. Complement ellipsis in English: Or how to cook without objects. In Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie (ed.), Studies in honour of René Derolez, 248–61, Ghent: Seminarie voor Engelse en Oud-Germaanse Taalkunde R.U.G.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1987b. Register variation in English: some theoretical implications. Journal of English Linguistics 20, 230–48.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1990. Understood subjects in English diaries: on the relevance of theoretical syntax for the study of register variation. Multilingua 9 (1), 157–99.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1997. Register variation, truncation, and subject omission in English and in French. English Language and Linguistics 1 (2), 233–70.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2002. Sentence-medial NP-adjuncts in English. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25, 79108.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2007. Subject omission in present-day written English: On the theoretical relevance of peripheral data. Rivista di grammatica generativa 32, 91124.
Haegeman, Liliane & Ihsane, Tabea. 1999. Subject ellipsis in embedded clauses in English. English Language and Linguistics 3 (1), 117–45.
Haegeman, Liliane & Ihsane, Tabea. 2001. Adult null subjects in the non-pro-drop languages: Two diary dialects. Language Acquisition 9 (4), 329–46.
Hoekstra, Teun & Schwartz, Bonnie (eds.). 1994. Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Horsey, Richard. 1998. Null arguments in English registers: A Minimalist account. BA thesis, La Trobe University.
Hyams, Nina M. 1986. Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Hyams, Nina M. 1994. V2, null arguments and COMP projections. In Hoekstra & Schwartz (eds.), 21–55.
Hyams, Nina M. 2011. Missing subjects in early child language. In de Villiers, Jill & Roeper, Thomas (eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition, 1352. Dordrecht: Springer. Draft accessed from
Mårdh, Ingrid. 1980. Headlinese: On the grammar of English front page headlines. Malmö: C. W. K. Gleerup.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1982. Initial material deletion in English. Glossa 16 (1), 85111.
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report, Rutgers University and University of Colorado at Boulder, 1993. Revised version published by Blackwell, 2004. [ROA 537.]
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1994. Early null subjects and root null subjects. In Hoekstra & Schwartz (eds.), 151–76.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur. 2007. Strategies of subject extraction. In Gärtner, Hans-Martin & Sauerland, Uli (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky's minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics, 115–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Roeper, Tom & Rohrbacher, Bernhard. 1994. Null subjects in early child English and the theory of Economy of Projection. University of Pennsylvania Institute for Research in Cognitive Science Technical Report No. IRCS-94–16.
Schmerling, Susan F. 1973. Subjectless sentences and the notion of surface structure. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 9, 577–86.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1978. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In Fretheim, Thorstein (ed.), Nordic prosody 2, 128–49. Trondheim: TAPIR.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. The prosodic structure of function words. In Beckman, Jill, Dickey, Laura Walsh & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2001. The syntax-phonology interface. In Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, Paul B. (eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 15407–12. Oxford: Pergamon.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2002. Contrastive focus vs. presentational focus: Prosodic evidence from Right Node Raising in English. In Speech prosody 2002: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on speech prosody, 643–6. Aix-en-Provence.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2006. Bengali intonation revisited: An optimality theoretic analysis in which FOCUS stress prominence drives FOCUS phrasing. In Lee, Chung-Min, Gordon, Matthew & Buering, Daniel (eds.), Topic and focus: A cross-linguistic perspective, 217–46. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax–phonology interface. In Goldsmith, John A., Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn, 435–84. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Straumann, Heinrich. 1935. Newspaper headlines: A study in linguistic method. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Thrasher, Randolph H. 1974. Shouldn't ignore these strings: A study of conversational deletion. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Thrasher, Randolph H. 1977. One way to say more by saying less: A study of so-called subjectless sentences. Kwansei Gakuin University Monograph Series vol. 11. Tokyo: Eihosha.
Weir, Andrew. 2009. Article drop in English headlinese. MA thesis, University College London.
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1983a. Cliticization vs inflection: English n't. Language 59 (3), 502–13.
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1983b. Deleting named morphemes. Lingua 59, 155–75.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries1

  • ANDREW WEIR (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.