Skip to main content Accessibility help

Null subjects in Middle English



This article investigates the occurrence and distribution of referential null subjects in Middle English. Whereas Modern English is the textbook example of a non-null-subject language, the case has recently been made that Old English permits null subjects to a limited extent, which raises the question of what happens in the middle period. In this article we investigate Middle English using data drawn from the Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English Prose and the new Parsed Corpus of Middle English Poetry, aiming to shed light on the linguistic and extralinguistic factors conditioning the alternation between null and overt subjects. Generalized mixed-effects logistic regression and random forests are used to assess the importance of the variables included. We show that the set of factors at play is similar to that found for Old English, and we document a near-complete disappearance of the null subject option by the end of the Middle English period.



Hide All
Adams, Marianne. 1987. From Old French to the theory of pro-drop. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 132.
Allen, Cynthia. 1995. Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Axel, Katrin. 2007. Studies on Old High German syntax: Left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb-second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berndt, Rolf. 1956. Form und Funktion des Verbums im nördlichen Spätaltenglischen. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Bies, Elizabeth A. 1996. Syntax and discourse factors in Early New High German: Evidence for verb-final word order. MA thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Cedergren, Henrietta & Sankoff, David. 1974. Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50, 333–55.
Coppess, Emily & Pires, Acrisio. 2013. The residue of syntactic change: Partial pro-drop in Old English. Paper presented at the LSA Summer Institute's Diachronic Syntax Workshop, Ann Arbor.
Denison, David. 2003. Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Motives for language change, 5470. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Einenkel, Eugen. 1916. Geschichte der englischen Sprache II: Historische Syntax. Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner.
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic change: Toward a theory of historical syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem & van der Wurff, Wim. 2000. The syntax of Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gelderen, Elly van. 2000. A history of English reflexive pronouns: Person, self and interpretability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gelderen, Elly van. 2013. Null subjects in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 44, 271–85.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1990. Understood subjects in English diaries. Multilingua 9, 157–99.
Haegeman, Liliane & Ihsane, Tabea. 1999. Subject ellipsis in embedded clauses in English. English Language and Linguistics 3, 117–45.
Håkansson, David. 2013. Null referential subjects in the history of Swedish. Journal of Historical Linguistics 3 (2), 155–91.
Hall, Joseph. 1995. Selections from Early Middle English 1130–1250, part I. Oxford: Clarendon.
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt, Strobl, Carolin & Zeileis, Achim. 2015. Party: A laboratory for recursive partytioning.
Hulk, Aafke & van Kemenade, Ans. 1995. V2, pro-drop, functional projections and language change. In Battye, Adrian & Roberts, Ian G. (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 227–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jenset, Gard B. 2010. A corpus based study of the evolution of there: Statistical analysis and cognitive interpretation. PhD thesis, University of Bergen.
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3, 359–83.
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2010. Rbrul manual. Online.
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1, 199244.
Kroch, Anthony. 1994. Morphosyntactic variation. In Beals, Katherine (ed.), Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 180201. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Kroch, Anthony. 2001. Syntactic change. In Baltin, Mark & Collins, Chris (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 699729. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel. 2004. Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English.
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 2000. Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English Prose.
Laing, Margaret & Lass, Roger. 2008. The linguistic atlas of Early Middle English, version 3.2.
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McIntosh, Angus, Samuels, M. L. & Benskin, Michael. 1986. A linguistic atlas of Late Middle English. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English syntax, part 1: Parts of speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Nagucka, Ruta. 1997. Glossal translation in the Lindisfarne Gospel according to Saint Matthew. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 31, 179201.
Ohlander, Urban. 1943. Omission of the object in English. Studia Neophilologica 16, 105–27.
Ohlander, Urban. 1981. Notes on the non-expression of the subject pronoun in Middle English. Studia Neophilologica 53, 3749.
Pintzuk, Susan. 1991. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Pogatscher, Alois. 1901. Unausgedrücktes Subjekt im Altenglischen. Anglia 23, 261301.
Randall, Beth, Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 2005–13. CorpusSearch 2. Online.
Rissanen, Matti, Kytö, Merja, Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena, Kilpiö, Matti, Nevanlinna, Saara, Taavitsainen, Irma, Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1991. Helsinki Corpus of English Texts.
Rosenkvist, Henrik. 2009. Referential null subjects in Germanic: An overview. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84, 151–80.
Rusten, Kristian A. 2010. A study of empty referential pronominal subjects in Old English. MA thesis, University of Bergen.
Rusten, Kristian A. 2013. Empty referential subjects in Old English prose – a quantitative analysis. English Studies 94 (8), 970–92.
Rusten, Kristian A. 2014. Null referential subjects from Old to early Modern English. In Haugland, Kari E., McCafferty, Kevin & Rusten, Kristian A. (eds.), ‘Ye whom the charms of grammar please’: Studies in English language history in honour of Leiv Egil Breivik, vol. 4, 249–70. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Rusten, Kristian A. 2015. A quantitative study of empty referential subjects in Old English prose and poetry. Transactions of the Philological Society 113 (1), 5375.
Rusten, Kristian A. 2016. Empty referential subjects in Old English. PhD thesis, University of Bergen.
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Smith, Eric. 2005. Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows.
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Smith, Eric. 2012. Goldvarb Lion.
Santorini, Beatrice. 1989. The generalization of the verb-second constraint in the history of Yiddish. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Santorini, Beatrice. 1992. Variation and change in Yiddish subordinate clause word order. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10, 595640.
Strang, Barbara M. H. 1970. A history of English. London: Methuen.
Strobl, Carolin, Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, Kneib, Thomas, Augustin, Thomas & Zeileis, Achim. 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 307.
Strobl, Carolin, Malley, James & Tutz, Gerhard. 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods 14, 323–48.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Harald Baayen, R.. 2012. Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24, 135–78.
Thomson, Clara L. 1907. Later Transition English: Legendaries and chroniclers. In Ward, Adolphus W. & Waller, Alfred R. (eds.), The Cambridge history of English literature, vol. 1: From the beginnings to the cycles of romance, 374401. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Visser, Frederik Theodor. 1963. An historical syntax of the English language, vol. 1. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Walkden, George. 2013. Null subjects in Old English. Language Variation and Change 25, 155–78.
Walkden, George. 2014. Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walkden, George. 2016. Null subjects in the Lindisfarne Gospels as evidence for syntactic variation in Old English. In Cuesta, Julia Fernández & Pons Sanz, Sara M. (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context (Buchreihe der Anglia), 237–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wallage, Phillip. 2005. Negation in early English: parametric variation and grammatical competition. PhD thesis, University of York.
Weir, Andrew. 2008. Subject pronoun drop in informal English. MA thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Williams, Alexander. 2000. Null subjects in Middle English existentials. In Pintzuk, Susan, Tsoulas, George & Warner, Anthony (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 164–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zimmermann, Richard. 2012. Variably overt and empty expletives with finite (and non-finite) clauses in early English. Paper presented at the International Congress of English Historical Linguistics 17 (ICEHL 17), Zurich.
Zimmermann, Richard. 2013. The Geneva Corpus of Middle English Poetry: Its construction and possible applications.
Zimmermann, Richard. 2015. The Parsed Corpus of Middle English Poetry.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Null subjects in Middle English



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.