Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-mgc9c Total loading time: 0.28 Render date: 2022-01-28T21:42:41.779Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Preferences for forms of land conservation investment in the Ethiopian Highlands: a household plot-level analysis of the roles of poverty, tenure security and market incentives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2015

Worku Genanew Bekele
Affiliation:
Economics Department, University of Dubai College of Business Administration, P.O. Box 14143, Dubai, UAE. Tel: +971- 056 6055303. E-mail: gbekele@ud.ac.ae or; gensich@yahoo.com
Friedrich Georg Schneider
Affiliation:
Economics Department, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Austria. E-mail: friedrich.schneider@jku.at

Abstract

This study used the multinomial logistic model to examine the factors leading to differences in farm-households' preferences for various forms of land conservation measures. Using a survey of 4,795 household-plots in rural Ethiopia, the study demonstrates the inappropriateness of pooling different forms of land conservation investments in preference studies. The results suggest that poverty drives farm-households towards conservation measures which are more short term and which entail the expenditure of less skill. While tenure security has a mixed effect on such preferences, market access seems not to matter for preference decisions. Further, farm-households consider the characteristics of the plot in their preference, which also vary across villages. This study shows that a farm-household's preference is a complex decision. Major changes in conservation investments on the part of farm-households will require attention to many factors, since no single factor exerts enough control to be used solitarily as a major policy leverage instrument.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alemu, T. (1999), ‘Land tenure and soil conservation: evidence from Ethiopia’, PhD thesis, Department of Economics, University of Göteborg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Amemiya, T. (1985), Advanced Econometrics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.A. (1984), ‘Regression and ordered categorical variables (with discussion)’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 46: 130.Google Scholar
Borsch-Supan, A. (1990), ‘On the compatibility of nested logit models with utility maximization’, Journal of Econometrics 43: 373388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, D.C., Kelly, V., Mpyisi, E., and Reardon, T. (2002), ‘Input use and conservation investments among farm households in Rwanda: patterns and determinants’, in Barrett, C.B., Place, F. and Aboud, A.A. (eds), Natural Resources Management in African Agriculture, Understanding and Improving Current Practices, Wallingford: CABI Publishing, pp. 103115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Africa, Farm (2001), Farmer participatory research in southern Ethiopia: the experiences of the Farmers Research Project, London: Farm Africa.Google Scholar
Feder, G., Onchan, T., Chalamwong, Y., and Hongladarom, C. (1988), Land Policies and Farm Productivity in Thailand, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (2005), ‘Rural land administration and land use proclamation No. 456/2005’, Federal Negarit Gazeta 11(44), 15 July.Google Scholar
Gebremedhin, B. and Swinton, S.M. (2003), ‘Investment in soil conservation in Northern Ethiopia: the role of land tenure security and public programs’, Agricultural Economics 29(1): 6984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genanew, B. and Alemu, M. (2012), ‘Investments in land conservation in the Ethiopian Highlands: a household plot-level analysis of the roles of poverty, tenure security, and market incentives’, International Journal of Economics and Finance 4(6): 3250.Google Scholar
Godoy, R., Kirby, K., and Wilkie, D. (2001), ‘Tenure security, private time preference, and use of natural resources among Lowland Bolivian Amerindians’, Ecological Economics 38: 105118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. (2011), Econometric Analysis, 7th edn, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hagos, F. and Holden, S. (2006), ‘Tenure security, resource poverty, public programs, and household plot-level conservation investments in the highlands of Northern Ethiopia’, Agricultural Economics 34(2): 183196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J. and Harrison, R. (2004), ‘A multinomial logit model of consumer perceptions for biotech food labeling’, Paper for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association (renamed in 2008 as the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association) in its Series 2004 Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, 1–4 August.Google Scholar
Holden, S. and Shiferaw, B. (2002), ‘Poverty and land degradation: peasants' willingness to pay to sustain land productivity’, in Barrett, C.B., Place, F. and Aboud, A.A. (eds), Natural Resources Management in African Agriculture, Understanding and Improving Current Practices, Wallingford: CABI Publishing, pp. 91102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, S., Shiferaw, B., and Wik, M. (1998), ‘Poverty, market imperfections, and time preference: of relevance to environmental policy?’, Environment and Development Economics 3: 105130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurni, H. (1985), ‘Erosion-productivity-conservation systems in Ethiopia’, Paper presented at the 4th International Conference of Soil Conservation, Maracay, Venezuela, 3–9 November.Google Scholar
Hurni, H. (1988), ‘Degradation and conservation of the resources in the Ethiopian Highlands’, Mountain Research and Development, African Mountains and Highlands 8(2/3): 123130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, P. and Katarina, Z. (2003), ‘Multinomial logit models for the Austrian labor market’, Austrian Journal of Statistics 32(4): 267282.Google Scholar
Long, J. (1997), Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences Series, London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Long, J. and Freese, J. (2006), Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 2nd edn College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. (1974), ‘Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour’, in Zarembka, P. (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, New York: Academic Press, pp. 105142.Google Scholar
Shiferaw, B. and Holden, S. (1999), ‘Soil erosion and smallholders' conservation decisions in the Highlands of Ethiopia’, World Development 27: 739752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, M. (1990), ‘Constraints to environmental rehabilitation through people's participation in the Northern Ethiopian Highlands’, Discussion Paper No. 13, UN Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bekele and Schneider supplementary material

Online Appendices

Download Bekele and Schneider supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 774 KB

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Preferences for forms of land conservation investment in the Ethiopian Highlands: a household plot-level analysis of the roles of poverty, tenure security and market incentives
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Preferences for forms of land conservation investment in the Ethiopian Highlands: a household plot-level analysis of the roles of poverty, tenure security and market incentives
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Preferences for forms of land conservation investment in the Ethiopian Highlands: a household plot-level analysis of the roles of poverty, tenure security and market incentives
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *