Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua

  • STEFANO PAGIOLA (a1), ANA R. RIOS (a2) and AGUSTIN ARCENAS (a3)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

This paper uses data from a Payments for Environmental Services (PES) project being implemented in Nicaragua to examine the extent to which poorer households that are eligible to participate are in fact able to do so, an issue over which there has been considerable concern. The study site provides a strong test of the ability of poorer households to participate, as it requires participants to make substantial and complex land use changes. The results show that poorer households are in fact able to participate – indeed, by some measures they participated to a greater extent than better-off households. Moreover, their participation was not limited to the simpler, least expensive options. Extremely poor households had a somewhat greater difficulty in participating, but even in their case the difference is solely a relative one. Transaction costs may be greater obstacles to the participation of poorer households than household-specific constraints.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author.
References
Hide All
Bandiera O. 2004, ‘Land tenure, incentives and the choice of techniques: evidence from Nicaragua’, LSE, London.
Belsley D.A. 1991, Conditioning Diagnostics, Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Belsley D.A., Kuh E., and Welsch R.E. 1980, Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Bruijnzeel L.A. 2004, ‘Hydrological functions of moist tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees?’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environments 104: 185228.
CGIAR 1997, ‘Report of the study on CGIAR research priorities for marginal lands’, CGIAR and FAO, Rome.
CIPAV 2003, Usos de la Tierra en Fincas Ganaderas: Guía para el Pago de Servicios Ambientales en el Proyecto Enfoques Silvopastoriles Integrados para el Manejo de Ecosistemas, Cali: Fundación CIPAV (in Spanish).
Dagang A.B.K. and Nair P.K.R. 2003, ‘Silvopastoral research and adoption in Central America: recent findings and recommendations for future directions’, Agroforestry Systems 59: 149155.
de Janvry A. and Sadoulet E. 2000, ‘Rural poverty in Latin America: determinants and exit paths’, Food Policy 25: 389409.
Dennis P., Shellard L., and Agnew R. 1996, ‘Shifts in arthropod species assemblages in relation to silvopastoral establishment in upland pastures’, Agroforestry Forum 7: 1421.
Díaz O., Dimas L.A., García M., Herrador D., and Méndez V.E. 2002, ‘Pago por servicios ambientales en El Salvador: Oportunidades y riesgos para pequeños agricultores y comunidades rurales’, PRISMA, San Salvador (in Spanish).
Downing T.E., Pearson H.A., and Garcia-Downing C. (eds) 1992, Development or Destruction: The Conversion of Tropical Forest to Pasture in Latin America, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Echevarría M. 2002a, ‘Financing watershed conservation: the FONAG water fund in Quito, Ecuador’, in Pagiola S., Bishop J., and Landell-Mills N. (eds), Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, London: Earthscan, pp. 91101.
Echevarría M. 2002b, ‘Water user associations in the Cauca valley: a voluntary mechanism to promote upstream–downstream cooperation in the protection of rural watersheds’, Land–Water Linkages in Rural Watersheds Case Study Series, FAO, Rome.
Ervin C.A. and Ervin D.E. 1982, ‘Factors affecting the use of soil conservation practices: hypothesis, evidence, and policy implications’, Land Economics 58: 278292.
Feder G., Just R.E., and Zilberman D. 1985, ‘Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 33: 255295.
Ferraro P.J. and Pattanayak S.K. 2006, ‘Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments’, PLoS Biology 4: 482488.
Fisher M.J., Rao I.M., Ayarza M.A., Lascano C.E., Sanz J.I., Thomas R.J., and Vera R.R. 1994, ‘Carbon storage by introduced deep-rooted grasses in the South American savannas’, Nature 371: 236238.
Gobbi J. 2002, ‘Enfoques silvopastoriles integrados para el manejo de ecosistemas en Colombia, Costa Rica y Nicaragua: Análisis económico-financiero ex-ante de la inversión en los SSP propuestos para cada país’, Turrialba, Costa Rica: CATIE (in Spanish).
Greene W.H. 2000, Econometric Analysis, 4th edn, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Grieg-Gran M., Porras I., and Wunder S. 2005, ‘How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America’, World Development 33: 15111527.
Harvey C. and Haber W. 1999, ‘Remnant trees and the conservation of biodiversity in Costa Rican pastures’, Agroforestry Systems 44: 3768.
Heath J. and Binswanger H. 1996, ‘Natural resource degradation effects of poverty and population growth are largely policy-induced: the case of Colombia’, Environment and Development Economics 1: 6584.
Kaimowitz D. 1996, Livestock and Deforestation in Central America in the 1980s and 1990s: A Policy Perspective, Bogor: CIFOR.
Kerr J. 2002, ‘Watershed development, environmental services, and poverty alleviation in India’, World Development 30: 13871400.
Landell-Mills N. and Porras I. 2002, Silver Bullet or Fools’ Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impact on the Poor, London: IIED.
López R. and Valdés A. 2000, Rural Poverty in Latin America, New York: St Martin's Press.
Mercer D.E. 2004, ‘Adoption of agroforestry innovations in the tropics: a review’, Agroforestry Systems 61: 311328.
Miranda M., Porras I.T., and Moreno M.L. 2003, ‘The social impacts of payments for environmental services in Costa Rica: a quantitative field survey and analysis of the Virilla watershed’, Markets for Environmental Services Paper No. 1, IIED, London.
Mittelhammer R.C., Judge G.G., and Miller D.J. 2000, Econometric Foundations, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Muñoz C., Guevara A., Bulás J.M., Torres J.M., and Braña J. 2006, ‘Los pagos por los servicios hidrológicos del bosque en México’, in Pagiola S., Bishop J., and Landell-Mills N. (eds), La Venta de Servicios Ambientales Forestales, 2nd edn, México: Instituto Nacional de Ecología, pp. 165206 (in Spanish).
Nelson A. and Chomitz K. 2007, ‘The forest–hydrology–poverty nexus in Central America: an heuristic analysis’, Environment, Development and Sustainability 9: 369385.
Nkonya E., Schroeder T., and Norman D. 1997, ‘Factors affecting adoption of improved maize seed and fertiliser in Northern Tanzania’, Journal of Agricultural Economics 48: 112.
Nowak P.J. 1987, ‘The adoption of agricultural conservation technologies: economic and diffusion explanations’, Rural Sociology 52: 208220.
Ortiz Malavasi R., Sage Mora L.F., and Borge Carvajal C. 2002, ‘Impacto del Programa de Pago por Servicios Ambientales en Costa Rica como medio de reducción de pobreza en los medios rurales’, RUTA, San José.
Pagiola S. forthcoming, ‘Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica’, Ecological Economics, Special issue on payments for environmental services: methods and design in developing and developed countries.
Pagiola S., Agostini P., Gobbi J., Haan C., Ibrahim M., Murgueitio E., Ramírez E., Rosales M., and Ruíz J.P. 2004, ‘Paying for biodiversity conservation services in agricultural landscapes’, Environment Department Paper No. 96, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Pagiola S., Arcenas A., and Platais G. 2005, ‘Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America’, World Development 33: 237253.
Pagiola S. and Colom A. 2006, ‘Will payments for watershed services help reduce poverty? Evidence from Guatemala’, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Pagiola S., Landell-Mills N., and Bishop J. 2002, ‘Making market-based mechanisms work for forests and people’, in Pagiola S., Bishop J., and Landell-Mills N. (eds), Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, London: Earthscan, pp. 261289.
Pagiola S. and Platais G. forthcoming, Payments for Environmental Services: From Theory to Practice, Washington: World Bank.
Pagiola S., Ramírez E., Gobbi J., de Haan C., Ibrahim M., Murgueitio E., and Ruíz J.P. 2007, ‘Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua’, Ecological Economics 64: 374–385, Special Issue on Ecosystem Services and Agriculture.
Pattanayak S.K., Mercer D.E., Sills E., and Yang J.-C. 2003, ‘Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies’, Agroforestry Systems 57: 173186.
Pfaff A., Kerr S., Hughes F., Liu S., Sanchez G., Schimel D., Tosi J., and Watson V. 2000, ‘The Kyoto Protocol and payments for tropical forest: an interdisciplinary method for estimating carbon-offset supply and increasing the feasibility of a carbon market under the CDM’, Ecological Economics 35: 203221.
Rajasekharan P. and Veeraputhran S. 2002, ‘Adoption of intercropping in rubber smallholdings in Kerala, India: a tobit analysis’, Agroforestry Systems 56: 111.
Ravallion M. 1992 ‘Poverty comparisons: A guide to concepts and methods’, LSMS Working Paper No. LSM 88, Washington: World Bank.
Thacher T., Lee D.R., and Schelhas J.W. 1997, ‘Farmer participation in reforestation incentive programs in Costa Rica’, Agroforestry Systems 35: 269289.
White H. 1980, ‘A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica 48: 817838.
White D., Holmann F., Fuijsaka S., Reategui K., and Lascano C. 2001, ‘Will intensifying pasture management in Latin America protect forests? – Or is it the other way round?’, in Angelsen A. and Kaimowitz D. (eds), Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation, Oxford: CAB International.
World Bank 2003, ‘Nicaragua reporte de pobreza: aumentando el bienestar y reduciendo la vulnerabilidad’, Report No. 26128-NI, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Wunder, S. 2005, ‘Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts’, CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42, CIFOR, Bogor.
Wunder S. and M. Albán forthcoming, ‘Decentralized payments for environmental services: the cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador’, Ecological Economics, Special issue on payments for environmental services: methods and design in developing and developed countries.
Zbinden S. and Lee D.R. 2005, ‘Institutional arrangements for rural poverty reduction and resource conservation’, World Development 33: 255272.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environment and Development Economics
  • ISSN: 1355-770X
  • EISSN: 1469-4395
  • URL: /core/journals/environment-and-development-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 26 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 144 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.