Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 35
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Cook, David C. Kristensen, Nadiah P. and Liu, Shuang 2016. Coordinated service provision in payment for ecosystem service schemes through adaptive governance. Ecosystem Services, Vol. 19, p. 103.


    Islam, Md Monirul Mohammed, Essam Yassin and Ali, Liaquat 2016. Economic incentives for sustainable hilsa fishing in Bangladesh: An analysis of the legal and institutional framework. Marine Policy, Vol. 68, p. 8.


    Michel, Julian Kallweit, Kay and von Pfeil, Evy 2016. Tropical Forestry Handbook.


    Raes, Leander D’Haese, Marijke Aguirre, Nikolay and Knoke, Thomas 2016. A portfolio analysis of incentive programmes for conservation, restoration and timber plantations in Southern Ecuador. Land Use Policy, Vol. 51, p. 244.


    Wegner, Giulia Irene 2016. Payments for ecosystem services (PES): a flexible, participatory, and integrated approach for improved conservation and equity outcomes. Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 18, Issue. 3, p. 617.


    Aguilar-Støen, Mariel 2015. Exploring participation in new forms of environmental governance: a case study of payments for environmental services in Nicaragua. Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 17, Issue. 4, p. 941.


    Hayes, Tanya Murtinho, Felipe Cárdenas Camacho, Luis Mario Crespo, Patricio McHugh, Sarah and Salmerón, David 2015. Can Conservation Contracts Co-exist with Change? Payment for Ecosystem Services in the Context of Adaptive Decision-Making and Sustainability. Environmental Management, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 69.


    Matthies, Brent D. Kalliokoski, Tuomo Ekholm, Tommi Hoen, Hans Fredrik and Valsta, Lauri T. 2015. Risk, reward, and payments for ecosystem services: A portfolio approach to ecosystem services and forestland investment. Ecosystem Services, Vol. 16, p. 1.


    Singh, Ranjay K. Singh, Anshuman Garnett, Stephen T. Zander, Kerstin K. Lobsang, and Tsering, Darge 2015. Paisang (Quercus griffithii): A Keystone Tree Species in Sustainable Agroecosystem Management and Livelihoods in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Environmental Management, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 187.


    Bremer, Leah L. Farley, Kathleen A. and Lopez-Carr, David 2014. What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program. Land Use Policy, Vol. 36, p. 122.


    Kwayu, Emmanuel J. Sallu, Susannah M. and Paavola, Jouni 2014. Farmer participation in the equitable payments for watershed services in Morogoro, Tanzania. Ecosystem Services, Vol. 7, p. 1.


    McElwee, Pamela Nghiem, Tuyen Le, Hue Vu, Huong and Tran, Nghi 2014. Payments for environmental services and contested neoliberalisation in developing countries: A case study from Vietnam. Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 36, p. 423.


    Zanella, Matheus A. Schleyer, Christian and Speelman, Stijn 2014. Why do farmers join Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes? An Assessment of PES water scheme participation in Brazil. Ecological Economics, Vol. 105, p. 166.


    Adhikari, Bhim and Boag, Gemma 2013. Designing payments for ecosystem services schemes: some considerations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 72.


    Jindal, Rohit Kerr, John M. Ferraro, Paul J. and Swallow, Brent M. 2013. Social dimensions of procurement auctions for environmental service contracts: Evaluating tradeoffs between cost-effectiveness and participation by the poor in rural Tanzania. Land Use Policy, Vol. 31, p. 71.


    Mahanty, Sango Suich, Helen and Tacconi, Luca 2013. Access and benefits in payments for environmental services and implications for REDD+: Lessons from seven PES schemes. Land Use Policy, Vol. 31, p. 38.


    Tacconi, Luca Mahanty, Sango and Suich, Helen 2013. The Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services and Implications for REDD+. Society & Natural Resources, Vol. 26, Issue. 6, p. 733.


    Benessaiah, Karina 2012. Carbon and livelihoods in Post-Kyoto: Assessing voluntary carbon markets. Ecological Economics, Vol. 77, p. 1.


    Goldman-Benner, Rebecca L. Benitez, Silvia Boucher, Timothy Calvache, Alejandro Daily, Gretchen Kareiva, Peter Kroeger, Timm and Ramos, Aurelio 2012. Water funds and payments for ecosystem services: practice learns from theory and theory can learn from practice. Oryx, Vol. 46, Issue. 01, p. 55.


    Jindal, Rohit Kerr, John M. and Carter, Sarah 2012. Reducing Poverty Through Carbon Forestry? Impacts of the N’hambita Community Carbon Project in Mozambique. World Development, Vol. 40, Issue. 10, p. 2123.


    ×

Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua

  • STEFANO PAGIOLA (a1), ANA R. RIOS (a2) and AGUSTIN ARCENAS (a3)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X08004270
  • Published online: 01 June 2008
Abstract
ABSTRACT

This paper uses data from a Payments for Environmental Services (PES) project being implemented in Nicaragua to examine the extent to which poorer households that are eligible to participate are in fact able to do so, an issue over which there has been considerable concern. The study site provides a strong test of the ability of poorer households to participate, as it requires participants to make substantial and complex land use changes. The results show that poorer households are in fact able to participate – indeed, by some measures they participated to a greater extent than better-off households. Moreover, their participation was not limited to the simpler, least expensive options. Extremely poor households had a somewhat greater difficulty in participating, but even in their case the difference is solely a relative one. Transaction costs may be greater obstacles to the participation of poorer households than household-specific constraints.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D.A. Belsley , E. Kuh , and R.E. Welsch 1980, Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

L.A. Bruijnzeel 2004, ‘Hydrological functions of moist tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees?’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environments 104: 185228.

A.B.K. Dagang and P.K.R. Nair 2003, ‘Silvopastoral research and adoption in Central America: recent findings and recommendations for future directions’, Agroforestry Systems 59: 149155.

A. de Janvry and E. Sadoulet 2000, ‘Rural poverty in Latin America: determinants and exit paths’, Food Policy 25: 389409.

C.A. Ervin and D.E. Ervin 1982, ‘Factors affecting the use of soil conservation practices: hypothesis, evidence, and policy implications’, Land Economics 58: 278292.

G. Feder , R.E. Just , and D. Zilberman 1985, ‘Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 33: 255295.

P.J. Ferraro and S.K. Pattanayak 2006, ‘Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments’, PLoS Biology 4: 482488.

M.J. Fisher , I.M. Rao , M.A. Ayarza , C.E. Lascano , J.I. Sanz , R.J. Thomas , and R.R. Vera 1994, ‘Carbon storage by introduced deep-rooted grasses in the South American savannas’, Nature 371: 236238.

M. Grieg-Gran , I. Porras , and S. Wunder 2005, ‘How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America’, World Development 33: 15111527.

C. Harvey and W. Haber 1999, ‘Remnant trees and the conservation of biodiversity in Costa Rican pastures’, Agroforestry Systems 44: 3768.

J. Kerr 2002, ‘Watershed development, environmental services, and poverty alleviation in India’, World Development 30: 13871400.

R. López and A. Valdés 2000, Rural Poverty in Latin America, New York: St Martin's Press.

A. Nelson and K. Chomitz 2007, ‘The forest–hydrology–poverty nexus in Central America: an heuristic analysis’, Environment, Development and Sustainability 9: 369385.

E. Nkonya , T. Schroeder , and D. Norman 1997, ‘Factors affecting adoption of improved maize seed and fertiliser in Northern Tanzania’, Journal of Agricultural Economics 48: 112.

S. Pagiola , A. Arcenas , and G. Platais 2005, ‘Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America’, World Development 33: 237253.

S. Pagiola , E. Ramírez , J. Gobbi , C. de Haan , M. Ibrahim , E. Murgueitio , and J.P. Ruíz 2007, ‘Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua’, Ecological Economics 64: 374–385, Special Issue on Ecosystem Services and Agriculture.

S.K. Pattanayak , D.E. Mercer , E. Sills , and J.-C. Yang 2003, ‘Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies’, Agroforestry Systems 57: 173186.

A. Pfaff , S. Kerr , F. Hughes , S. Liu , G. Sanchez , D. Schimel , J. Tosi , and V. Watson 2000, ‘The Kyoto Protocol and payments for tropical forest: an interdisciplinary method for estimating carbon-offset supply and increasing the feasibility of a carbon market under the CDM’, Ecological Economics 35: 203221.

P. Rajasekharan and S. Veeraputhran 2002, ‘Adoption of intercropping in rubber smallholdings in Kerala, India: a tobit analysis’, Agroforestry Systems 56: 111.

T. Thacher , D.R. Lee , and J.W. Schelhas 1997, ‘Farmer participation in reforestation incentive programs in Costa Rica’, Agroforestry Systems 35: 269289.

H. White 1980, ‘A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica 48: 817838.

D. White , F. Holmann , S. Fuijsaka , K. Reategui , and C. Lascano 2001, ‘Will intensifying pasture management in Latin America protect forests? – Or is it the other way round?’, in A. Angelsen and D. Kaimowitz (eds), Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation, Oxford: CAB International.

S. Zbinden and D.R. Lee 2005, ‘Institutional arrangements for rural poverty reduction and resource conservation’, World Development 33: 255272.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environment and Development Economics
  • ISSN: 1355-770X
  • EISSN: 1469-4395
  • URL: /core/journals/environment-and-development-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×