Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

GETTIERIZED KNOBE EFFECTS

Abstract
Abstract

We report experimental results showing that participants are more likely to attribute knowledge in familiar Gettier cases when the would-be knowers are performing actions that are negative in some way (e.g. harmful, blameworthy, norm-violating) than when they are performing positive or neutral actions. Our experiments bring together important elements from the Gettier case literature in epistemology and the Knobe effect literature in experimental philosophy and reveal new insights into folk patterns of knowledge attribution.

Copyright
Corresponding author
jbeebe2@buffalo.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Mark Alfano , James R. Beebe , and Brian Robinson . 2012. “The Centrality of Belief and Reflection in Knobe Effect Cases: A Unified Account of the Data.” The Monist, 95: 264–89.

Mark D. Alicke 2008. “Blaming Badly.” Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8: 179–86.

James R. Beebe 2013. “A Knobe Effect for Belief Ascriptions.” The Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4: 235–58.

James R. Beebe , and Wesley Buckwalter . 2010. “The Epistemic Side-Effect Effect.” Mind & Language, 25: 474–98.

James R. Beebe , and Mark Jensen . 2012. “Surprising Connections Between Knowledge and Intentional Action: The Robustness of the Epistemic Side-Effect Effect.” Philosophical Psychology, 25: 689715.

Simon Cullen . 2010. “Survey-Driven Romanticism.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1: 275–96.

Keith DeRose . 2011. “Contextualism, Contrastivism, and X-Phi Surveys.” Philosophical Studies, 156: 81110.

Shane Frederick . 2005. “Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19: 2542.

Edmund L. Gettier 1963. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis, 23: 121–3.

Joshua Knobe . 2003a. “Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language.” Analysis, 63: 190–3.

Joshua Knobe . 2003b. “Intentional Action in Folk Psychology: An Experimental Investigation.” Philosophical Psychology, 16: 309–24.

Joshua Knobe . 2004. “Folk Psychology and Folk Morality: Response to Critics.” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24: 270–9.

Joshua Knobe . 2007. “Reason Explanation in Folk Psychology.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31: 90106.

Joshua Knobe , and Gabriel. Mendlow 2004. “The Good, the Bad, and the Blameworthy: Understanding the Role of Evaluative Considerations in Folk Psychology.” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24: 252–8.

Thomas Nadelhoffer . 2004. “On Praise, Side Effects, and Folk Ascriptions of Intentionality.” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24: 196213.

Jennifer Nagel . 2012a. “Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85: 495527.

Jennifer Nagel . 2012b. “Mindreading in Gettier Cases and Skeptical Pressure Cases.” In Jessica Brown and Mikkel Gerken (eds), Knowledge Ascriptions, pp. 171–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

N. Ángel Pinillos , Nick Smith , G. Shyam Nair , Peter Marchetto , and Cecilea. Mun 2011. “Philosophy's New Challenge: Experiments and Intentional Action.” Mind & Language, 26: 115–39.

Jonathan Schaffer , and Joshua Knobe . 2012. “Contrastive Knowledge Surveyed.” Noûs, 46: 675708.

Bryan Skyrms . 1967. “The Explication of ‘X Knows that P’.” Journal of Philosophy, 64: 373–89.

Christina Starmans , and Ori Friedman . 2012. “The Folk Conception of Knowledge.” Cognition, 124: 272–83.

Jonathan M. Weinberg , Shaun Nichols , and Stephen Stich . 2001. “Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions.” Philosophical Topics, 29: 429–60.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Episteme
  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 135 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.