Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Masterton, George Olsson, Erik J. and Angere, Staffan 2016. Linking as voting: how the Condorcet jury theorem in political science is relevant to webometrics. Scientometrics, Vol. 106, Issue. 3, p. 945.

    Feldbacher, Christian J. 2015. Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki.

    Thompson, Christopher 2013. A general model of a group search procedure, applied to epistemic democracy. Synthese, Vol. 190, Issue. 7, p. 1233.

    Spiekermann, Kai and Goodin, Robert E. 2012. Courts of Many Minds. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 42, Issue. 03, p. 555.

    Dietrich, Franz 2010. Bayesian group belief. Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 35, Issue. 4, p. 595.

    Spiekermann, Kai 2010. Judgement aggregation and distributed thinking. AI & SOCIETY, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 401.


The Premises of Condorcet's Jury Theorem Are Not Simultaneously Justified


Condorcet's famous jury theorem reaches an optimistic conclusion on the correctness of majority decisions, based on two controversial premises about voters: they are competent and vote independently, in a technical sense. I carefully analyse these premises and show that: (i) whether a premise is justified depends on the notion of probability considered and (ii) none of the notions renders both premises simultaneously justified. Under the perhaps most interesting notions, the independence assumption should be weakened.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Ben-Yashar and J. Paroush . 2000. “A Nonasymptotic Condorcet Jury Theorem.” Social Choice and Welfare 17: 189–99.

D. Berend and J. Paroush . 1998. “When Is Condorcet's Jury Theorem Valid?Social Choice and Welfare 15: 481–8.

P. J. Boland 1989. “Majority Systems and the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” Statistician 38: 181–9.

P. J. Boland , F. Proschan , and Y. L. Tong . 1989. “Modelling Dependence in Simple and Indirect Majority Systems.” Journal of Applied Probability 26: 81–8.

L. Bovens and W. Rabinowicz . 2006. “Democratic Answers to Complex Questions: An Epistemic Perspective.” Synthese 150(1): 131–53.

F. Dietrich and C. List . 2004. “A Model of Jury Decisions Where All Judges Have the Same Evidence.” Synthese 142: 175202.

D. Estlund 1994. “Opinion Leaders, Independence, and Condorcet's Jury Theorem.” Theory and Decision 36(2): 131–62.

T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer . 1997. “Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information.” Econometrica 65(5): 1029–58.

B. Grofman , G. Owen , and S. L. Feld . 1983. “Thirteen Theorems in Search of the Truth.” Theory and Decision 15: 261–78.

K. K. Ladha 1992. “The Condorcet Jury Theorem, Free Speech, and Correlated Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 617–34.

K. K. Ladha 1993. “Condorcet's Jury Theorem in Light of De Finetti's Theorem.” Social Choice and Welfare 10: 6985.

K. K. Ladha 1995. “Information Pooling Through Majority-rule Voting: Condorcet's Jury Theorem with Correlated Votes.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 26: 353–72.

C. List and R. E. Goodin . 2001. “Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” Journal of Political Philosophy 9: 277306.

S. Nitzan and J. Paroush . 1984. “The Significance of Independent Decisions in Uncertain Dichotomous Choice Situations.” Theory and Decision 17: 4760.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *