Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Economically irrational pricing of nineteenth-century British government bonds

  • Andrew Odlyzko (a1)
Abstract

British government bonds formed the deepest, most liquid and most transparent financial market of the nineteenth century. This article shows that those bonds had long periods, extending over decades, of anomalous behavior, in which Consols, the largest and best known of these instruments, were noticeably overpriced relative to equivalent securities which offered the same interest rate and the same guarantee of payment. This finding and similar ones for other comparable pairs of British gilts appear to provide the most extreme counterexamples documented so far to the Efficient Markets Hypothesis and to the Law of One Price, and point the way to further investigations on the origins and nature of the modern economy.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Economically irrational pricing of nineteenth-century British government bonds
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Economically irrational pricing of nineteenth-century British government bonds
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Economically irrational pricing of nineteenth-century British government bonds
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
A. Odlyzko, School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; email: odlyzko@umn.edu; www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko .
Footnotes
Hide All
Comments from the anonymous referees and the editor are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also due to Ron Alquist, Rob Brown, Jan Klovland, Larry Neal, Richard Sylla and the Nineteenth Century Subfield group at the University of Minnesota (especially Michael Hancher) for comments and information, to the Times Newspapers Ltd Archive for information from their files, and to Yuxi Chen, Yuanshun Yao, Yilin Zhai, Yiqun Zhang, Jialu Zhong and Ying Zhu for assistance in transcribing and checking transcriptions of gilt prices. The many other individuals and institutions that assisted in the larger research project of which this is a part are thanked at www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/mania-ack.html.
Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Alquist (2010). How important is liquidity risk for sovereign bond risk premia? Evidence from the London Stock Exchange. Journal of International Economics, 82, pp. 219–29.

J. Atack and L. Neal (2009). The Origins and Development of Financial Markets and Institutions: From the Seventeenth Century to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

R. L. Brown and S. A. Easton (1989). Weak-form efficiency in the nineteenth century: a study of daily prices in the London market for 3 percent consols, 1821–1860. Economica, 56, pp. 6170.

W. O. Brown , R. C. K. Burdekin , and M. D. Weidenmier (2006). Volatility in an era of reduced uncertainty: lessons from Pax Britannica. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, pp. 693707.

C. F. Camerer (1989). Bubbles and fads in asset markets: a review of theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 3, pp. 338.

M. Fleckenstein , F. A. Longstaff and H. Lustig (2014). Why does Treasury issue TIPS? The TIPS-Treasury bond puzzle. Journal of Finance, 69, pp. 2151–97.

D. R. Green , A. Owens , J. Maltby and J. Rutterford (2011). Men, Women, and Money: Perspectives on Gender, Wealth, and Investment, 1850–1930. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

C. E. Heim and P. Mirowski (1987). Interest rates and crowding-out during Britain's industrial revolution. Journal of Economic History, 47, pp. 117–39.

R. G. Ibbotson and T. M. Idzorek (2014). Dimensions of popularity. Journal of Portfolio Management, 40, pp. 6874.

J. T. Klovland (1994). Pitfalls in the estimation of the yield on British Consols, 1850–1914. Journal of Economic History, 54, pp. 164–87.

D. R. Kuipers (2008). Does deliverability enhance the value of US Treasury bonds? Journal of Futures Markets, 28, pp. 264–74.

O. A. Lamont and R. H. Thaler (2003). Anomalies: the Law of One Price in financial markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, pp. 191202.

L. Levi (1862). On the progress and economical bearings of national debts in this and other countries. Journal of Statistical Society of London, 25, pp. 313–38.

H. Mitchell , R. Brown and S. Easton (2002). Old volatility – ARCH effects in 19th century consol data. Applied Financial Economics, 12, pp. 301–7.

L. Neal and L. Davis (2006). The evolution of the structure and performance of the London Stock Exchange in the first global financial market, 1812–1914. European Review of Economic History, 10, pp. 279300.

A. Scherbina and B. Schlusche (2014). Asset price bubbles: a survey. Quantitative Finance, 14, pp. 589604.

A. Shleifer (2000). Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

A. Shleifer and L. Summers (1990). The noise trader approach to finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, pp. 1933.

J. J. Siegel (1992). The real rate of interest from 1800–1990: a study of the US and the UK. Journal of Monetary Economics, 29, pp. 227–52.

D. Vayanos and P. Weill (2008). A search-based theory of the on-the-run phenomenon. Journal of Finance, 63, pp. 1361–99.

W. Xiong and J. Yu (2011). The Chinese warrants bubble. American Economic Review, 101, pp. 2723–53.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Financial History Review
  • ISSN: 0968-5650
  • EISSN: 1474-0052
  • URL: /core/journals/financial-history-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Odlyzko supplementary material
Odlyzko supplementary material 1

 PDF (1.5 MB)
1.5 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 139 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 254 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th January 2017 - 24th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.