Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • JOEL ISAAC (a1)

Histories of analytic philosophy in the United States have typically focused on the reception of logical positivism, and especially on responses to the work of the Vienna Circle. Such accounts often call attention to the purportedly positivist-inspired marginalization of normative concerns in American philosophy: according to this story, the overweening positivist concern for logic and physics as paradigms of knowledge displaced questions of value and social relations. This article argues that the reception framework encourages us to mistake the real sources of the analytic revolution in post-war philosophy. These are to be found in debates about intentional action and practical reasoning – debates in which ‘normative’ questions of value and social action were in fact central. Discussion of these topics took place within a transatlantic community of Wittgensteinians, ordinary languages philosophers, logical empiricists, and decision theorists. These different strands of ‘analytical’ thinking were bound together into a new philosophical mainstream not by a positivist alliance with logic and physics, but by the rapid development of the mathematical and behavioural sciences during the Second World War and its immediate aftermath. An illustrative application of this new framework for interpreting the analytic revolution is found in the early career and writings of Donald Davidson.

Corresponding author
Christ's College, Cambridge, CB2
Hide All

This article is based on my 2011 Balzan-Skinner lecture, delivered at the Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities (CRASSH) in the University of Cambridge. I should like to express my gratitude to Mary Jacobus, the director of CRASSH during my tenure there, for helping me settle into a term of research as the 2011 Balzan-Skinner fellow. My thanks also to CRASSH's administrative staff, which carried out the hard work of organizing and promoting the Balzan-Skinner lecture and colloquium. My fellow participants in the colloquium – Thomas Akehurst, Andrew Jewett, Edmund Neill, and Bjørn Ramberg – gave me valuable feedback on the first draft of this article. Finally, I owe special thanks to Quentin Skinner, both for establishing the fellowship I held at CRASSH, and for his suggestions for improvement to the argument presented in the lecture.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

James T. Kloppenberg , ‘Pragmatism: an old name for some new ways of thinking?’, Journal of American History, 83 (1996), pp. 100–38

Michael Friedman , Reconsidering logical positivism (Cambridge, 1999)

Alan Richardson and Thomas Uebel , eds., The Cambridge companion to logical empiricism (Cambridge, 2007)

George R. Reisch , How the Cold War transformed philosophy of science: to the icy slopes of logic (Cambridge, 2005)

Philip Mirowski , ‘Cyborg agonistes: economics meets operations research in mid-century’, Social Studies of Science, 29 (1999), pp. 685718

idem, ‘The scientific dimensions of social knowledge and their distant echoes in 20th-century American philosophy of science’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science: Part A, 35 (2004), pp. 283326

Ernest LePore and Kirk Ludwig , Donald Davidson: meaning, truth, language, and reality (Oxford, 2005)

Jeff Malpas , ed., Dialogues with Davidson: acting, interpreting, understanding (Cambridge, MA, 2011)

J. L. Austin , ‘A plea for excuses’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 57 (1956), pp. 130

Keith Donnellan , ‘Knowing what I am doing’, Journal of Philosophy, 60 (1963), pp. 401–9

Roderick M. Chisholm and Richard Taylor , ‘Making things to have happened’, Analysis, 20 (1960), pp. 73–8

Roderick M. Chisholm , ‘The descriptive element in the concept of action’, Journal of Philosophy, 61 (1964), pp. 613–25

Kathrin Glüer , Donald Davidson: a short introduction (New York, NY, 2011)

Alexander Broadie , ‘The practical syllogism’, Analysis, 29 (1968), pp. 26–8

A Kenny , ‘The practical syllogism and incontinence’, Phronesis, 11 (1966), pp. 163–84

Mary Mothersill , ‘Anscombe's account of the practical syllogism’, Philosophical Review, 71 (1962), pp. 448–61

Amy Shell-Gellasch , ‘Mina Rees and the funding of the mathematical sciences’, American Mathematical Monthly, 109 (2002), pp. 873–89

Donald Davidson , J. C. C. McKinsey and Patrick Suppes , ‘Outlines of a formal theory of value, I’, Philosophy of Science, 22 (1955), pp. 140–60

Patrick Suppes , ‘Some remarks on problems and methods in the philosophy of science’, Philosophy of Science, 21 (1954), pp. 242–8

Patrick Suppes and Muriel Winet , ‘An axiomatization of utility based on the notion of utility differences’, Management Science, 1 (1955), pp. 259–70

William Vickrey , ‘Measuring marginal utility by reactions to risk’, Econometrica, 13 (1945), pp. 319–33

Milton Friedman and L. J. Savage , ‘The utility analysis of choices involving risk’, Journal of Political Economy, 56 (1948), pp. 279304

Jacob Marschak , ‘Rational behavior, uncertain prospects, and measurable utility’, Econometrica, 18 (1950), pp. 111–41

Kenneth J. Arrow , ‘Alternative approaches to the theory of choice in risk-taking situations’, Econometrica, 19 (1951), pp. 404–37

L. J. Savage , ‘The theory of statistical decision’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46 (1951), pp. 5567

Frederick Mosteller and Philip Nogee , ‘An experimental measurement of utility’, Journal of Political Economy, 59 (1951), pp. 371404

Donald Davidson , ‘Belief and the basis of meaning’, Synthese, 27 (1974), pp. 309–23

Donald Davidson and Patrick Suppes , ‘A finitistic axiomatization of subjective probability and utility’, Econometrica, 24 (1956), pp. 264–75

Donald Davidson , ‘A new basis for decision theory’, Theory and Decision, 18 (1985), pp. 8798

Herbert Feigl , ‘The logical character of the principle of induction’, Philosophy of Science, 1 (1934), pp. 20–9

Hans Reichenbach , ‘Induction and probability’, Philosophy of Science, 3 (1936), pp. 124–6

idem, ‘Testability and meaning – continued’, Philosophy of Science, 4 (1937), pp. 140

Rudolf Carnap , ‘Testability and meaning’, Philosophy of Science, 3 (1936), pp. 419–71

Hans Reichenbach , ‘On the justification of induction’, Journal of Philosophy, 37 (1940), pp. 97103

Erik P. Rau , ‘The adoption of Operations Research in the United States during World War II’, in Thomas P. Hughes and Agatha C. Hughes , eds., Systems, experts, and computers: the systems approach in management and engineering, World War II and after (Cambridge, MA, 2000), pp. 5792

Mina Rees , ‘The mathematical sciences and World War II’, American Mathematical Monthly 87 (1980), p. 611

Milton Friedman and L. J. Savage , ‘The expected-utility hypothesis and the measurability of utility’, Journal of Political Economy, 60 (1952), pp. 463–74

L. J. Savage , ‘On the foundations of statistical inference: discussion’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57 (1962), pp. 307–26

M. Fortun and S. S. Schweber , ‘Scientists and the legacy of World War II: the case of operations research (OR)’, Social Studies of Science, 23 (1993), pp. 595642

C. West Churchman and Russell L. Ackoff , ‘Varieties of unification’, Philosophy of Science, 13 (1946), pp. 287300

Russell L. Ackoff , ‘An educational program for the philosophy of science’, Philosophy of Science, 16 (1949), pp. 154–7

idem, ‘Economic value and moral value’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 30 (1916), pp. 443–85

idem, ‘Value as election and satisfaction’, International Journal of Ethics, 41 (1931), pp. 429–42

idem, ‘Some questions about value’, Journal of Philosophy, 41 (1944), pp. 449–55

idem, ‘Valuation judgments and immediate quality’, Journal of Philosophy, 40 (1943), pp. 309–17

Ralph Barton Perry , ‘The definition of value’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 11 (1914), pp. 141–62

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Historical Journal
  • ISSN: 0018-246X
  • EISSN: 1469-5103
  • URL: /core/journals/historical-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 221 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.